--On 19. Oktober 2006 15:03:43 -0300 Sidnei da Silva
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:43:22PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
| Most of the active Zope developers do *not* run Zope on Windows, which
| is why there are no Windows binaries for recent Zope versions. We do
| have
On Thu, Oct 19, 2006 at 01:43:22PM -0400, Tres Seaver wrote:
| Most of the active Zope developers do *not* run Zope on Windows, which
| is why there are no Windows binaries for recent Zope versions. We do
| have plenty of "real world" experience with running Zope on Linux, Mac,
| and other Unixoid
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wolfgang Strobl wrote:
> Chris Withers simplistix.co.uk> writes:
>
>> Wolfgang Strobl wrote:
>>> I'll have to stay with 2.9.4 or older, for the forseeable future.
>>> Somehow, I wonder whether current Zope2 releases get any
>>> real world testing
Chris Withers simplistix.co.uk> writes:
> Wolfgang Strobl wrote:
>> I'll have to stay with 2.9.4 or older, for the forseeable future.
>> Somehow, I wonder whether current Zope2 releases get any
>> real world testing before becoming "stable". Did perhaps all
>> testing happen on the Windows si
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed Oct 18 10:00:02 2006 UTC to Thu Oct 19 10:00:02 2006 UTC.
There were 9 messages: 9 from Zope Unit Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (errors=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.3 : Linux
From: Zope Unit Tests
Date: Wed Oct 18 21:48:48
Wolfgang Strobl wrote:
I'll have to stay with 2.9.4 or older, for the forseeable future. Somehow, I
wonder whether current Zope2 releases get any real world testing before becoming
"stable". Did perhaps all testing happen on the Windows side, in the past? ;-)
Er, no. You'll likely find that
