--On 21. März 2008 13:39:08 -0700 Timothy Selivanow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-03-21 at 20:09 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
speaking as the Zope 2 release manager: I am strongly opposed against
splitting Zope yourself into different packages and modules. With Zope
2 depending
--On 21. März 2008 23:17:51 +0100 Felix Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I hope this is the right list for my question related to zope.interface:
I use some (non-zope) software which uses zope.interface (currently
3.0.1). Now there is another software which needs a newer version of
Andreas Jung schrieb:
The best thing is: try it out! Since your application has unittests, it
should be easy to verify the functionality against a new version :-)
The problem is more complicated unfortunately: I want to use z3c.rml which
needs zope.schema, zope.interface and other packages.
--On 22. März 2008 11:00:00 +0100 Felix Schwarz [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung schrieb:
The best thing is: try it out! Since your application has unittests, it
should be easy to verify the functionality against a new version :-)
The problem is more complicated unfortunately: I
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Mar 21 12:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Mar 22 12:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Mar 21 21:54:07 EDT 2008
URL:
On Sat, Mar 22, 2008 at 11:00:00AM +0100, Felix Schwarz wrote:
Andreas Jung schrieb:
The best thing is: try it out! Since your application has unittests, it
should be easy to verify the functionality against a new version :-)
The problem is more complicated unfortunately: I want to use
Recently I needed to optimize an application leveraging z3c.form. One of
the speedups involved replacing page template rendering with pure python
rendering.
I found that doing this was highly iffy (I don't like registering
adapters implementing IPageTemplate that clearly don't).
To try and fix
