Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Jul 18 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Jul 19 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Jul 18 21:01:14 EDT 2008
URL:
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 16 July 2008, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
this came out of the ST project, where we constantly repeated this sort
of code.
Not that it matters much, but I think it was Martijn Faassen who wrote it.
... who worked on ST at the time and saw this pattern
On Jul 19, 2008, at 6:33 AM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Laurence Rowe wrote:
This is now fixed in trunk. For the moment I'm depending on
SQLAlchemy trunk for the new after_attach hook until beta3 is
released.
Maybe it's time to start depending on 0.5?
No problem with that from my side,
Hi there,
Thanks for the offer. I think this is up to Laurence to decide, I'd
say. I'm aiming my work at the 0.5 series so I'm fine with requiring
0.5.
Regards,
Martijn
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is now fixed in trunk. For the moment I'm depending on SQLAlchemy
trunk for the new after_attach hook until beta3 is released.
Could the fix be backported and a new release made? I have to have this
particular system ready for production next week,
On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is now fixed in trunk. For the moment I'm depending on
SQLAlchemy
trunk for the new after_attach hook until beta3 is released.
Could the fix be backported and a new release made? I
Michael Bayer wrote:
On Jul 19, 2008, at 10:29 AM, Brandon Craig Rhodes wrote:
Laurence Rowe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is now fixed in trunk. For the moment I'm depending on SQLAlchemy
trunk for the new after_attach hook until beta3 is released.
Could the fix be backported and a new
