Re: [Zope-dev] zc.dict.OrderedDict efficiency

2008-09-20 Thread Gary Poster

On Sep 18, 2008, at 4:02 PM, Benji York wrote:

> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 3:52 PM, Thomas Lotze <[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> lotze.de> wrote:
>> The documentation of OrderedDict from zc.dict 1.2.1 states that the
>> current implementation is inefficient for large collections because  
>> it
>> uses a PersistentList to store the order. It also says that a BList  
>> which
>> would be preferrable is not used as it is not yet released.
>>
>> - What's the state of those BLists? Are they just around the corner  
>> or
>> would it be worthwhile to consider some interim solution to the
>> efficiency issue?
>
> I'm not aware of zc.blist's current state, but I think it's more-or- 
> less
> ready.  If not and anyone knows what needs to be done to ready it  
> for a
> release, you could take that up (the code is in svn.zope.org).

Yup, it's ready.  Stress tests run for several hours without bugs,  
last I worked on it.  I had an idea of automatically converting  
failing stress tests to repeatable tests, but by the time I had the  
idea, the stress test wasn't failing any more.  That was really the  
only thing holding me back from releasing.

To release it responsibly now, someone needs to claim maintainership.

Gary
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 2 OK, 3 Failed

2008-09-20 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Fri Sep 19 11:00:00 2008 UTC to Sat Sep 20 11:00:00 2008 UTC.
There were 5 messages: 5 from Zope Tests.


Test failures
-

Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Sep 19 20:54:54 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-September/010192.html

Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Sep 19 20:56:24 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-September/010193.html

Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-trunk Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Sep 19 20:57:54 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-September/010194.html


Tests passed OK
---

Subject: OK : Zope-2.8 Python-2.3.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Sep 19 20:51:53 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-September/010190.html

Subject: OK : Zope-2.9 Python-2.4.4 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Fri Sep 19 20:53:24 EDT 2008
URL: http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2008-September/010191.html

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Where to put custom schemas for z3c.form that depend onspecific libraries?

2008-09-20 Thread Hermann Himmelbauer
Am Samstag 20 September 2008 03:37:00 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
> Hi Hermann
>
> > Betreff: [Zope-dev] Where to put custom schemas for z3c.form
> > that depend onspecific libraries?
> >
> > Hi,
> > I need to create a specific schema for international bank
> > account numbers (IBAN). I'd like to contribute this widget
> > (maybe someone has use for it).
> > However, this schema needs a specific library for validation,
> > therefore I wonder where to put it? If I put it in z3c.schema
> > (e.g. z3c.schema.iban / z3c.schema.payment), the library
> > dependency will be problematic, I assume.
> >
> > Maybe I should create an own package for it? But with what
> > name? What do you think?
>
> We should only put dependency less packages in to z3c.schema
> because we will release that package as one egg.
>
> I think there is already a z3c.password schema field including a
> widget etc.
>
> I recommend to put that package into the z3c namespace.
> z3c.iban will be a very good name since the IBAN number
> is now the defacto standard for international transactions.
>
> Does this makes sens for you?

Yes, that's fine, "z3c.iban", then.

Best Regards,
Hermann


-- 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
GPG key ID: 299893C7 (on keyservers)
FP: 0124 2584 8809 EF2A DBF9  4902 64B4 D16B 2998 93C7
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )