On 08/01/2009 01:35 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Unfortunately, I've got other packages that depend on a newer
zope.testing (specifically, collective.testcaselayer). But I thought
Christian Theune wrote:
On 08/01/2009 01:35 AM, Godefroid Chapelle wrote:
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 9:33 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Unfortunately, I've got other packages that depend on a newer
zope.testing (specifically,
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sat Aug 1 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Sun Aug 2 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 8 messages: 8 from Zope Tests.
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED (failures=1) : Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.2 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sat Aug 1 20:50:29 EDT
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 4:43 PM, Stephan
Richtersrich...@cosmos.phy.tufts.edu wrote:
Hi everyone,
last week I worked on getting the KGS trunk located in zope.release to pass
without failures. (Python 2.5 on Linux, i686)
Thanks so much!
As we discussed on IRC, there are still some open issues
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 6:34 PM, Jim Fultonj...@zope.com wrote:
2. Some of the tests only pass if run separately, due to test
interactions. Presumably, this means that other tests aren't cleaning
up after themselves. I think we need a standard automated way to run
each package's tests
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 25.07.09 13:57, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
At this point I think we need to declare 64-bit platforms as
unsupported. Hopefully people with the right kind of knowledge would
like to step up and start working on these issues.
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I think I have fixed the ExtensionClass and Acquisition problems for
64-bit machines: I released new eggs to PyPI for them:
Awesome!
You wouldn't be interested to look at the C code in Persistence and
Zope2 itself? ;-)
Hi,
the doctests for zope.index 3.5.2 - as used in Zope 2.12 - fail badly:
File
/home/ajung/.buildout/eggs/zope.index-3.5.2-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/zope/index/text/tests/../textindex.txt,
line 143, in textindex.txt
Failed example:
[(k, %.4f % v) for (k, v) in index2.apply(Zorro).items()] ==
On 02.08.09 20:30, Tres Seaver wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
On 25.07.09 13:57, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
At this point I think we need to declare 64-bit platforms as
unsupported. Hopefully people with the right kind of knowledge would
like to step up and start working on these issues.
This
On 02.08.09 20:48, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
the doctests for zope.index 3.5.2 - as used in Zope 2.12 - fail badly:
File
/home/ajung/.buildout/eggs/zope.index-3.5.2-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/zope/index/text/tests/../textindex.txt,
line 143, in textindex.txt
Failed example:
[(k, %.4f % v)
On 02.08.09 21:00, Andreas Jung wrote:
On 02.08.09 20:48, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
the doctests for zope.index 3.5.2 - as used in Zope 2.12 - fail badly:
File
/home/ajung/.buildout/eggs/zope.index-3.5.2-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/zope/index/text/tests/../textindex.txt,
line 143, in
On 8/2/09 3:07 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On 02.08.09 21:00, Andreas Jung wrote:
On 02.08.09 20:48, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
the doctests for zope.index 3.5.2 - as used in Zope 2.12 - fail badly:
File
On 8/2/09 4:41 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
On 8/2/09 3:07 PM, Andreas Jung wrote:
On 02.08.09 21:00, Andreas Jung wrote:
On 02.08.09 20:48, Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
the doctests for zope.index 3.5.2 - as used in Zope 2.12 - fail badly:
File
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
the doctests for zope.index 3.5.2 - as used in Zope 2.12 - fail badly:
File
/home/ajung/.buildout/eggs/zope.index-3.5.2-py2.6-linux-x86_64.egg/zope/index/text/tests/../textindex.txt,
line 143, in textindex.txt
Failed
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris McDonoughchr...@plope.com wrote:
That said, why does Zope 2.1.2 use the zope.index textindex? The Zope 2
implementation is still very superior.
The current policy for the test runs is to test both all direct
dependencies and all transitive dependencies
On 8/2/09 5:19 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
Hi,
the doctests for zope.index 3.5.2 - as used in Zope 2.12 - fail badly:
File
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 8:30 PM, Tres Seavertsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I think I have fixed the ExtensionClass and Acquisition problems for
64-bit machines: I released new eggs to PyPI for them:
Awesome!
You
On 8/2/09 5:23 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Chris McDonoughchr...@plope.com wrote:
That said, why does Zope 2.1.2 use the zope.index textindex? The Zope 2
implementation is still very superior.
The current policy for the test runs is to test both all direct
On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 11:35 PM, Chris McDonoughchr...@plope.com wrote:
There's no way any release of Zope 2 should depend on zope.index, at least
until its index implementations are as good as the ones in Zope 2 itself. I
don't know if in the short term (for a release) that means that the
19 matches
Mail list logo
