Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Dec 6 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Mon Dec 7 12:00:00 2009 UTC.
There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests.
Tests passed OK
---
Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
From: Zope Tests
Date: Sun Dec 6 20:38:20 EST 2009
URL:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 08:27, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
When I worked on py3 stuff on the DZUG sprint in September, we broke out
of that catch-22 by porting zope.testing first, and running its test
using http://pypi.python.org/pypi/discover, patched[1] to pick up
tests via the
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 15:46, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
That doesn't seem to work. If I use discover withing setup.py, I get
the same problems as using the standard setuptools testrunner. If I
have a custom script that I run to run the tests, the tests seem to
get stuck in some
FYI: I solved it. As usual the solution was dead simple once it struck me.
I made a custom test command for setuptools, that simply create a
temporary script modeled after the bin/test script that buildout would
create, and call that. Problem solved!
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 16:24, Lennart Regebro
I started a new branch for porting zope.testing to Python 3, for
several reasons, mostly because I got confused and decided starting
over with a clean copy and beginning with the new Distribute python 3
support from start would make me less foncused (it worked). The
branches aren't that different
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lennart Regebro wrote:
snip
I really think it's a bad idea to have a special version of
doctest.py. I think we should get rid of it. That means either
dropping this feature, or getting it merged into Python 2.7 and 3.2.
The 2.7 beta is out now,
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 22:23, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I really think it's a bad idea to have a special version of
doctest.py. I think we should get rid of it. That means either
dropping this feature, or getting it merged into Python 2.7 and 3.2.
The 2.7 beta is out now, so
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I really think it's a bad idea to have a special version of
doctest.py.
I agree.
I think we should get rid of it. That means either
dropping this feature, or getting it merged into Python 2.7 and 3.2.
The 2.7 beta
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 23:12, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2009 at 4:08 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
...
I really think it's a bad idea to have a special version of
doctest.py.
I agree.
I think we should get rid of it. That means either
dropping this
