Am 05.05.2010 um 11:11 schrieb Adam GROSZER:
Hello Andreas,
Seems like you pinned there 'zope.testing=3.4.', what is rather
in conflict even with the KGS3.4.0 (which has 3.5.1).
Do you remember why you pinned it?
Version 1.1.0 is not compatible with zope.testing 3.4.x, it requires at
If I followed the commits correctly, the mkzeoinst was extracted from
ZODB3 package and is now in the zope.mkzeoinstance, right?
Vincent
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 6:40 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Vincent Fretin wrote:
If I followed the commits correctly, the mkzeoinst was extracted from
ZODB3 package and is now in the zope.mkzeoinstance, right?
Yes. I was questioning why a ZTK user, rather than somebody using an
appserver like Zope2, etc.,
Tres Seaver wrote:
Vincent Fretin wrote:
If I followed the commits correctly, the mkzeoinst was extracted from
ZODB3 package and is now in the zope.mkzeoinstance, right?
Yes. I was questioning why a ZTK user, rather than somebody using an
appserver like Zope2, etc., would need a
On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 2:37 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
ZODB is only included in the ZTK as a dependency, because some packages
import it: nothing else in the ZTK configures server instances.
Nothing in zopeapp uses it either?
Not that I know off.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Vincent Fretin wrote:
If I followed the commits correctly, the mkzeoinst was extracted from
ZODB3 package and is now in the zope.mkzeoinstance, right?
Yes. I was questioning why a ZTK user, rather than
Tres Seaver wrote:
BlueBream or grokproject, which generate code to set up applications,
might want to pull it in (or emit the depenency into the generated
code). Zope2 definitely needs it.
If it's sensible for all three projects to use it I think it makes sense
for it to be in the ZTK. Even
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Wed May 5 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Thu May 6 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 16 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 9 from ccomb at free.fr, 1 from ct
at gocept.com.
Test
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On May 5, 2010, at 2:42 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Log message for revision 112025:
Conform to repository policy.
...
setup(
name='zope.minmax',
version='1.1.3dev',
-author='Zope Corporation and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
BlueBream or grokproject, which generate code to set up applications,
might want to pull it in (or emit the depenency into the generated
code). Zope2 definitely needs it.
If it's sensible for all three
On May 6, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune has already mentioned that the inclusion of the author
check in his script was a misunderstanding.
If you did not see that message already it's here:
https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2010-April/040223.html
Can we
On 05/06/2010 03:44 PM, Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
On May 6, 2010, at 9:09 AM, Tres Seaver wrote:
Christian Theune has already mentioned that the inclusion of the author check
in his script was a misunderstanding.
If you did not see that message already it's here:
On 05/06/2010 03:54 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Test failures
-
Subject: FAILED: Repository policy check found errors in 625 projects
From: ct at gocept.com
Date: Wed May 5 21:19:20 EDT 2010
URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zvezdan Petkovic wrote:
Copyright and author are two different things.
ZF has the copyright. We signed that in the contributor agreement.
Why exactly is Zope Foundation and Contributors a more reasonable
value? When has Zope Foundation
On May 6, 2010, at 9:52 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
You're right. And I was slow and laggy. The change is in. It's been a
mis-assumption on my side to think author information being equal to
copyright ownership and I fixed that in the script.
Thank you.
Zvezdan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Theune wrote:
Looking at the failures: I can see any reason why the following are not
passing the check as of 19:20 EDT yesterday:
- - zope.i18n/trunk
Interesting case of a file checked in with differing copyright. What's
our
16 matches
Mail list logo
