Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Mon Dec 6 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Tue Dec 7 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 98 messages: 8 from Zope Tests, 4 from buildbot at pov.lt, 19 from
buildbot at winbot.zope.org, 11 from ccomb at free.fr, 56 from jdriessen at
thehealthagency.com.
Test
Hello,
In zope.publisher 3.9.0, the signature of the redirect method of a
response changed to include a new trusted option that you *need* to
set to True in order to get redirect working in most cases
(otherwise it denies the redirect that are not in the domain than your
application).
I'm trying to decide whether to repurpose the conflict detection in
zope.configuration for non-XML configuration.
zope.configuration has the following resolveConflicts function, which
attempts to resolve action discriminator conflicts.
def resolveConflicts(actions):
Resolve conflicting
Independent of my previous call for discussion about ZCML conflict
resolution, I'm cutting and pasting my side of a discussion about the
ZCML includeOverrides directive from an IRC chat, because it may come
in useful for folks grappling with its behavior. There's not really any
human-consumable
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Independent of my previous call for discussion about ZCML conflict
resolution, I'm cutting and pasting my side of a discussion about the
ZCML includeOverrides directive from an IRC chat, because it may come
in useful for
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:51 PM, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:38 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
...
A user wants to reuse a high-level component (aka package aka
project in distutils
jargon aka product in distutils jargon). They want to customize
the
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:08 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Independent of my previous call for discussion about ZCML conflict
resolution, I'm cutting and pasting my side of a discussion about the
ZCML includeOverrides
On 12/07/2010 12:27 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I *think* I'm of the opinion that libraries (or even reusable
applications) probably shouldn't need to use includeOverrides.
+1, I would be very suspicious of any library that uses
includeOverrides. Any use of it ought to be highly visible to
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 2:27 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:08 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 1:57 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Independent of my previous call for discussion about ZCML conflict
resolution, I'm cutting and
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 14:27 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
[13:48] mcdonc override is exactly the wrong phrase to use in the name
of this directive
[13:51] mcdonc what it boils down to is that you never, ever really
want to use includeOverrides except in your rootmost zcml file
10 matches
Mail list logo
