Re: [Zope-dev] Getting back to green

2011-10-18 Thread Adam GROSZER
Hello,

On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:58:55 -0400 you wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
 Hash: SHA1

 On 10/17/2011 10:21 AM, Adam GROSZER wrote:
 Hello,

 On Mon, 17 Oct 2011 10:08:55 -0400 you wrote:

 -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1

 We've lost our discipline about keeping the daily tests passing.
 I think this is due to two factors:

 - - We are running tests for code that nobody is actively
 maintaining (e.g., all the 'z3c.*' packages which have been
 broken for months).

 If you mean the failures on windowze, I think most of them fail on
 lxml not having windows egg :-S, someone should kick Sidnei(???)

 If the z3c.* packages are being maintained, but not by folks who can
 resolve that issue on Windows, then we should do the testing on a
 platform where the maintainers *can* get the tests to pass.  Having
 the board stay red destroys its value for *everybody*, including those
 who don't need or care about those packages.
 - - Because of the noise of those failures, we've gotten
 complacent about seeing multiple failures in the daily test
 report, and thus quit trying to find and fix new failures in
 code which is maintained.

 I would like to propose that we quit reporting test failures for
 the unmaintained packages ('zc3.*', for a start.  If somebody
 really thinks there is value in such testing, we could perhaps
 run those tests only weekly (like the others which have
 expected failures).

 If it's about suppressing the *reporting* then suppress that, not
 the test runs please. Just in case someone wants to maintain a
 package ;-)

 Why waste any resources on tests if nobody is going to find and fix
 failures?

Aber hallo, z3c.form is in there. I do *not* think that's not maintained.
Actually I *know* what's the problem, just can't solve it.

Keeping the tests running is like having the *positive* attitude instead 
of the dark I don't care.



-- 
Best regards,
  Adam GROSZER
--
Quote of the day:
Drama often obscures the real issues
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [collective.recipe.solrinstance] Example not working

2011-10-18 Thread Hanno Schlichting
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
 Should we migrate the recipe to github and get a free issue tracker?

Ok. I've started the SVN to Git migration. Repo will be at
https://github.com/hannosch/collective.recipe.solrinstance and anyone
who has recently committed should have contributor rights to the new
repo.

Andreas: Please add an issue at
https://github.com/hannosch/collective.recipe.solrinstance/issues ;)

Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] [collective.recipe.solrinstance] Example not working

2011-10-18 Thread Andreas Jung
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1



Hanno Schlichting wrote:
 On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:05 PM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk
 wrote:
 Should we migrate the recipe to github and get a free issue
 tracker?
 
 Ok. I've started the SVN to Git migration. Repo will be at 
 https://github.com/hannosch/collective.recipe.solrinstance and
 anyone who has recently committed should have contributor rights to
 the new repo.
 
 Andreas: Please add an issue at 
 https://github.com/hannosch/collective.recipe.solrinstance/issues ;)

I am trying to figure out the problem right now. I have now a
configuration running with Solr 3.3.0. Apparently more a documentation
or configuration bug than a recipe bug...

Andreas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=RyeI
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
attachment: lists.vcf___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 21, OK: 31

2011-10-18 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the 
zope-tests list between 2011-10-17 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-10-18 00:00:00 UTC:

See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds.

An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our 
buildbot documentation: 
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html#the-nightly-builds

Reports received


[1]ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
[2]ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
[3]ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
[4]ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
[5]ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
[6]ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
[7]ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
[8]ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
[9]ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
   Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.4.6 64bit linux
   Zope 3.4 KGS / Python2.5.5 64bit linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-32bit-linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.4-64bit-linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-32bit-linux
   Zope 3.4 Known Good Set / py2.5-64bit-linux
   Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.11 Python-2.4.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.12-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.13 Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-2.13-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-trunk Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   Zope-trunk-alltests Python-2.6.6 : Linux
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_254_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_265_win64
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win32
   winbot / ZODB_dev py_270_win64
[10]   winbot / z3c.authenticator_py_265_32
[11]   winbot / z3c.baseregistry_py_265_32
[12]   winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
[13]   winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
[14]   winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32
[15]   winbot / z3c.jsontree_py_265_32
[16]   winbot / z3c.layer.pagelet_py_265_32
[17]   winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32
[18]   winbot / z3c.macro_py_265_32
[19]   winbot / z3c.pagelet_py_265_32
[20]   winbot / z3c.tabular_py_265_32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_10 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win32
   winbot / ztk_11 py_270_win64
[21]   winbot / ztk_dev py_254_win32
   winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win32
   winbot / ztk_dev py_265_win64
   winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win32
   winbot / ztk_dev py_270_win64

Non-OK results
--

[1]FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.4.6 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051301.html


[2]FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051299.html


[3]FAILED  ZTK 1.0dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051300.html


[4]FAILED  ZTK 1.1 / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051346.html


[5]FAILED  ZTK 1.1 / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051345.html


[6]FAILED  ZTK 1.1 / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051344.html


[7]FAILED  ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.5.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051302.html


[8]FAILED  ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.6.5 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051304.html


[9]FAILED  ZTK 1.1dev / Python2.7.2 Linux 64bit
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051303.html


[10]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.authenticator_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051316.html


[11]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.baseregistry_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051314.html


[12]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.contents_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051313.html


[13]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.form_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051308.html


[14]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.formui_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051309.html


[15]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.jsontree_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051315.html


[16]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.layer.pagelet_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051311.html


[17]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.layer.ready2go_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051319.html


[18]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.macro_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051317.html


[19]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.pagelet_py_265_32
   https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051318.html


[20]   FAILED  winbot / z3c.tabular_py_265_32