[Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 10, OK: 37

2011-10-28 Thread Zope tests summarizer
This is the summary for test reports received on the zope-tests list between 2011-10-27 00:00:00 UTC and 2011-10-28 00:00:00 UTC: See the footnotes for test reports of unsuccessful builds. An up-to date view of the builders is also available in our buildbot documentation: http://docs.zope.org/

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 37

2011-10-28 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 10/28/2011 01:21 PM, Tres Seaver wrote: > [T]he issue is that there are 'Data.fs' files in the *main working > trees* on the buildbot.afpy.org machine. Christophe, can you please > find and remove such files? After digging around, it looks like t

Re: [Zope-dev] zope-tests - FAILED: 9, OK: 37

2011-10-28 Thread Tres Seaver
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 > [1]FAILED Bluebream / Python2.6.7 64bit linux > https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-tests/2011-October/051792.html I'm > assuming thie is the same UCS4 / UCS2 iaaue as #2 and #3. > [2]FAILED ZTK 1.0 / Python2.6.7 Linux 64bit > https

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 4 publisher/traversal, sprint topic

2011-10-28 Thread Chris Withers
On 28/10/2011 08:46, yuppie wrote: > Is that the fault of the publisher? AFAICT the biggest security problem > of Zope2 is this line in OFS.SimpleItem.Item: > > # Allow (reluctantly) access to unprotected attributes > __allow_access_to_unprotected_subobjects__=1 > > I'm not familiar wit

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 4 publisher/traversal, sprint topic

2011-10-28 Thread yuppie
Hi! Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: > After the last two rather serious security issues that were recently > patched in the Zope2 code base, it is increasingly clear to me that, > differently than what Hanno reported some time ago, it's not so much > the ZMI that represents a huge security liabil