I would strongly recommend using python version 2.1.3 for Zope 2.5.1 -
2.6.x and python = 2.2.2 for Zope 2.6.x.
Adam
On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 12:06, Tena Sakai wrote:
Greetings zope-dev folks,
Please help me out.
I have seen below via google search:
Zope 2.5 + Python 2.1 -- Good
Hi there,
I'm currently testing (documenting, building RPM packages for) the
following configuration:
RedHat 8.0
python 2.1.3
postgresql 7.3
mx 2.0.3
psycopg 1.1
Zope-2.6.1b1
Having just got all the packages built and installed, I thought I'd run
the database adapter, Zope and postgres through
Just for curiousity, what is the use case for returning multiple columns with
the same name? Sounds dubious to me.
A self join will return multiple columns with the same name unless AS
keyword is used. The use of AS keyword is supposed to be optional.
Assuming that a user does use AS, labeling
I am working on spec/RPM for Zope 2.6.x, but obviously a working
python2.1.3 install is a pre-req if I want to support RH8.0 with the
Zope RPMS :-)
Attached are the changes made to the spec so that the python 2.1.3 SRPM
from python.org would --rebuild nicely on RedHat 8.0
Changes:
Made tools
Slightly of topic I know, but I thought someone here might know...
I'm tweaking the python2.1 SRPM from python.org to get it to play
nice with RedHat 8.0. Now that I have it compiling nicely, I thought it
would be a good idea to fully regression test the resulting python
install, especially as we
Looks good,
I was planning to start from scratch with building a RPM for 2.6
that would work on at least RedHat 8.x AND 7.x.. Coincidentally,
this is something I planned to start on tomorrow! :-)
Instead, I'll take a few hours tomorrow to test your spec on
RedHat 8.0, it would be *really*
I'm not sure that is the case you know. Oracle 9i Linux is faster on my
Linux Athlon 800 than the same release on my Win2k Dual Piii 1GHz.
Also my Win box has 1Gb ram, while my Linux box has only 512Mb...
In other news Apache is reported to run faster on Linux that Win2000,
as is
At 12:38 AM 8/22/02, Chris McDonough wrote:
I have created (yet another, perhaps) easy Zope install branch off the
current Zope trunk.
It allows for a ./configure; make; make install sort of Zope
installation for the source release. It also includes a version of the
nascent zctl.py that has
The change log:
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.6.0a1/CHANGES.txt
Contains no mention of Zope 2.5.1 beta 2.
Bugfixes that were a part of beta2 are listed under the heading after Zope
2.5.1
Some important changes, eg:
Fixed a bug in TM.py that would cause database adapters to hang on
Today, I was planning to see if I could create a single zopeedit.py that
works on both unix and W32..
Looking in CVS I saw that Casey has been busy, and that this is one of many
things that have been done already. I also noticed that you were up kinda
late last night Casey?!? :-)
Anyway,
I have built a Zope 2.5.1 source RPM, it's ready for community tasting and
testing ;-)
Zope Corp, could you please host it, perhaps at
http://www.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.5.1 ?
I would like to only make it available in .src.rpm format initially, so
that users testers can rpmbuild --rebuild
Fellow bleeding edge Zopers, (Zopesters, Zopeheads, Zopers and Zopists too)
Firstly, I'd like to thank everyone who has worked on the Segfault Saga,
esp. Matthew and Leonardo!
Obviously now that it's fixed, all that's left to do is to make stability a
reality for everybody ;-)
Does anyone
At 12:01 PM 3/27/02, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
But you don't need reliability compensation to multiplex. SSH assumes
the transport layer is reliable. So an SSH tunnel and an SSL tunnel are
virtually synonymous.
They're not really, but yeah, I was wrong :)
A SSL
For a look at why TCP over TCP is a bad idea, (e.g. ssh port forwarding)
see: http://sites.inka.de/sites/bigred/devel/tcp-tcp.html
For a solution, see: http://sites.inka.de/~bigred/devel/cipe.html
;-)
Adam
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL
Interesting. One complication with that scheme is that ther is no
convenient place to put caching. If it goes between Pen and Zope, you
need many instances of your cache. If it goes between Pen and the
clients, Pen's client-clustering is defeated because it sees only one
client.
Postgresql
Europe late afternoon = EST morning
How would 1700 UTC (GMT) be for most people?
People generally asleep between 12am and 6am.
Therefore the best time is logically 2am or so central Pacific time
(affecting very few)
This is corresponds to 2pm GMT, 9am US EST, etc
Adam
FYI, everyone who's following this: I have hijacked
http://dev.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Proposals/InstallationAndConfiguration
for this purpose. :-)
Awesome. Exactly how I'd like the default zope install to be structured.
:-)
Adam
___
Zope-Dev
I can confirm that throwing this at a Zope 2.5.0 root VirtualHostMonster:
http://localhost:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/example.org:80/VirtualHostRoot/_vh_zopeRoot/
provides a page with this link:
http://example.org//zopeRoot/p_/ZopeButton
and on 2.4.4 you get:
I tried out version 1.6 of:
http://cvs.zope.org/Zope/lib/python/Products/SiteAccess/VirtualHostMonster.py
dated 2002/02/15 21:20:33
It works!!
I got the correct:
http://example.org/zopeRoot/p_/ZopeButton
link on the page when I pointed my browser at:
What info can you get from dtml-var REQUEST , say in a dtml doc called
env_test ??
eg:
ServerName newsite
ProxyPass /
http://192.168.X.Y:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/newsite:80/newsite/VirtualHostRoot/
ProxyPassReverse /
At 09:10 AM 1/21/02, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Guys, please,
We really need 2.4.4 and our client won't accept a CVS version. 2.5
betas won't do it either.
I think that's the case in many environments, mine included.
I've been seriously considering rolling 2.3.3 back out just for the long
Just to be safe ... You shouldn't use this entire patch unless your
server is behind apache or a proxy server and best if protected by a
firewall. It could open a potential security leak if you use the
domains field for authentication and the zope server is not
protected by
Fellow Zope addicts,
I do both name and IP based virtual hosting from a single Apache instance,
proxypassing
to various different places within Zope. It works great, with or without
Apache working
mod_ssl magic!
Except.
There's a little issue with Zope logging to be solved.
Zope logs the
23 matches
Mail list logo
