Hi.
On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
Agenda
--
- Can we ensure building Windows binaries?
We talked about the status of this a bit. I just finished checking the
list of packages with C extensions as listed at
On Mon, Mar 8, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Roger d...@projekt01.ch wrote:
Another point, reloading ZCML actions after a system startup
e.g. from the UI is probably not possible anymore. Then we whould
have to call setSite(None) and this, on a running system, whould
force to loose the local components
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 8:01 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
I'm not sure that testing ZTK against the package trunks is quite the
right thing: we have to be free to make changes to trunks while leaving
the ZTK known good on older, stable versions: otherwise we might as
well[ be
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 7:19 AM, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
A thought that came up when reading this paragraph: another option
restructuring/grouping to reduce the amount of packages may be to join
smaller packages with weird boundaries into larger ones again. (Not that
I suggest
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:12 AM, Roger d...@projekt01.ch wrote:
I like to use getGlobalSiteManager by default because this
doesn't force a database access and load the local site
manager if the site is a local site.
The database access only happens if a local site is set into the
corresponding
On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 10:56 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
In Zope 2.10 exception views were acquisition-wrapped in the publisher
context.
In Zope 2.10, exception views didn't exist in Zope2. They were only
introduced in Zope 2.11.
This appears to have changed in Zope 2.12:
On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Hermann Himmelbauer du...@qwer.tk wrote:
The problem seems to be somewhere in between SQLAlchemy and pysqlite (both
install, however).
It seems it works anyway. But these errors consume quite some time (around 10
minutes), any idea what to do?
The problem is
On Fri, Feb 5, 2010 at 2:35 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
Maybe I missed something, but it seems to me that
Globals.DevelopmentMode in Zope 2.12 is always False, even if you
start Zope in fg, or set debug-mode to on in the configuration file.
This works for me and
On Wed, Feb 3, 2010 at 2:20 PM, Tom Gross itconse...@gmail.com wrote:
with HTML5 the frame-elements will die. It will probably take some
years before the browser-support of HTML4 will stop, but still. Are
there any alternative implementations for the Zope2-ZMI?
I'd very much expect the
On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 6:15 AM, Attila Oláh attilao...@gmail.com wrote:
I've just found this old checkin:
http://www.mail-archive.com/zope-check...@zope.org/msg04196.html . Can
someone please explain me very briefly (or point out some
documentation), why is it better to store a copy of
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
BFG uses the ZCA for some implementation details, I'm not sure if that
is the same as 'builds on the ZCA'. I don't think you can use the ZTK
with BFG - the vast majority of ZTK packages are too tied to concepts
that do
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 7:59 PM, Souheil CHELFOUH troll...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm coding some stuff, using zope.app.authentication and this package
appears to do too many things, in my opinion.
Would it be wise to cut off some of the functionalities ? The pure PAU
components could go in a
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:37 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
I also don't know of any applications running on the other frameworks,
which is why it's so empty there.
SchoolTool and Launchpad have been mentioned as Zope3 applications in
the past. Karl would be an example for BFG.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
Is Launchpad available as an application you can install and run?
For some definition of that, yes: https://dev.launchpad.net/
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:45 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
So it seems like a good idea to explicitly distinguish the set of packages
that
BFG uses from the ZTK by giving the bicycle repair toolkit a name and saying
that the ZTK depends on that, if only to give another target
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 3:56 AM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
I would like to get your opinion about this position statement,
as it involve the wider Zope ecosystem. However, we tried to be
diplomatic about other project's relationship with ZTK as we don't
want to claim anything
Hi.
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 4:08 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
A couple of questions about zope.testing's --coverage option:
I think the standard option is to use something like this buildout snippet:
[coverage-test]
recipe = zc.recipe.testrunner
eggs = ${buildout:eggs}
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 4:53 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 13.01.2010, 16:58 Uhr, schrieb Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu:
Installing Visual Studio Express makes this a whole lot easier. I can
provide py2.6-win32 eggs for the following:
Most of
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 5:43 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
Am 14.01.2010, 17:12 Uhr, schrieb Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
Why are you trying to use that version? Zope 2.12.3 includes
zope.container 3.8.2 as defined at
http://download.zope.org/Zope2/index
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:26 PM, Roger d...@projekt01.ch wrote:
Which concept should the ZTK use? The plain
vocabulary from zope.schema.vocabulary or the
enhanced component lookupbased concept defined
in zope.app.schema.vocabulary?
Any idea how zope.componentvocabulary fits into this?
Hanno
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 4:31 PM, Roger d...@projekt01.ch wrote:
The zope.componentvocabulary package defines some
basic vocabulary (factory) classes. Probably we
should move the zope/app/schema/vocabulary.py
to this package as registry.py.
If it doesn't introduce new dependencies, that sounds
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 7:56 AM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
Can somebody please fix zope.contettype on PyPI? We had a 3.5.0 release,
and somebody uploaded a 3.4.3 release which should have been 3.5.1.
What makes you think it should have been 3.5.1? The changelog says:
Updated
On Thu, Dec 31, 2009 at 2:56 PM, Fabio Tranchitella
fa...@tranchitella.eu wrote:
... things changed now: both 3.4.3 and 3.5.0 are visible; this morning when
I checked, only 3.4.3 was visible, and thus my buildbot warned me that some
dependencies in the ZTK were unsatisfied (and buildout tried
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 9:16 AM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
Delete operations will trigger events modifying other global metadata
related
to the those objects. So this approach requires modification to the
application in
order to avoid such side effects.
But if you do it from a
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 6:38 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
zope.testing.doctestunit emits a deprecation warning. It also defines a
function pprint. How does one use pprint without getting a deprecation
warning? It seems impossible now, and an equivalent pprint doesn't
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
I was going through Zope 2 source code today. There are 20+ top-level
packages specific to Zope 2. Would it be useful if we move those packages
to a top-level namespace package. I mean something similar to:
zope.app.*,
2009/12/29 Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as:
I get the following error:
File build/bdist.linux-i686/egg/Zope2/utilities/load_site.py, line 248
body = (htmlheadtitledtml-var title_or_id/title
^
SyntaxError: EOL while
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
I started documenting the Zope 2 release process (Zope 2.12 only for now):
svn+ssh://svn.zope.org/repos/main/zope2docs/trunk/maintenance/index.rst
Hints and feedback appreciated.
Cool. Looks quite good already. You could
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 03:59:07PM +, Chris Withers wrote:
Marius Gedminas wrote:
It'd be even better if there was a command I could run to generate an
up-to-date default zope.conf, like mkzopeinstance does. Is there
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 9:54 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
And let's please not turn this around: I'm not putting anything *in*.
Something was *removed*. Let's remove it responsibly. Not just disclaim
responsibility and drop it all.
So far I defined the ZTK based on what we
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 10:53 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
Ah, but then why The Official Zope 2.12 Installation Guide at
http://docs.zope.org/zope2/releases/2.12/INSTALL.html#buildout-instances
doesn't even mention plone.recipe.zope2instance?
Should it? The namespace of the
On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:28 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
What do y'all Zope-2-maintainer-people think about this patch?
[...]
Looks good.
I'll take that as a +0.
Please do.
Thanks,
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:11 AM, Martijn Faassen
faas...@startifact.com wrote:
I think a zopeapp KGS that will help them transition existing code from
Zope 2.12 to Zope 2.13 in working condition would be helpful to Zope 2
users.
Not really. Zope 2.12 is exactly that transitionary release
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 12:55 AM, Martijn Faassen
faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Not really. Zope 2.12 is exactly that transitionary release defining a
KGS for everything that was included in Zope 2.11 (~3.4.1).
Ah, I didn't realize Zope 2.12 was already based
On Wed, Dec 30, 2009 at 1:46 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Assuming ZTK x.y won't have zope.app packages, this means that those
upgrading to Zope 2.13 might be helped by a list of working versions of
those zope.app.* packages (such as the one in zopeapp), or am I wrong?
Of
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:18 PM, Fred Drake fdr...@acm.org wrote:
Can someone set me up with PyPI privs for zope.contenttype?
Sure, you got it :)
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No
On Mon, Dec 28, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Martijn Faassen
faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
The ZTK no longer contains any zope.app packages.
I think we should be careful to just remove the zope.app packages from
the ZTK entirely. I.e. we should maintain the versions
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 8:12 AM, Shane Hathaway sh...@hathawaymix.org wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
It has a dependency on zope.app.publication. Given the central role of
zope.traversing I allowed it and zope.app.publication to stay in the
ZTK, but moved it to the under-review option
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 9:54 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
It sounds like it'd be possible to fix these test dependencies in a
different way. I agree that the ideal solution is to have a zope.intid
with more sane test dependencies. I'm not sure pre-emptive ejection
from the
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 6:55 AM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Log message for revision 107134:
Moved zope.formlib / zope.app.form integration into a separate package
called five.formlib.
YAY! You rock, Hanno.
Thanks, we all did our part to get Zope2
Hi.
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 2:23 PM, Roger d...@projekt01.ch wrote:
Just assinged Owner roles for fafhrd and hannosch
to zope.initid, zope.catalog and zope.app.testing
Thanks! I made new releases of both of them and put them back into the ZTK.
Hanno
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 3:10 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Is deprecating in 2.13 and removal in 2.14 ok? Or does anyone have a
different preference? Is it ok to backport this to 2.12?
+1 to dropping it in Zope 2.13: folks who are using it will
just
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 5:43 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
+1 for shipping Zope 2.12.3 with five.formlib
-1 for adding new deprecation warnings in a bugfix release
Ok. So I'll backport five.formlib to the 2.12 branch leaving BBB
imports
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
So, ZTK is ready for 1.0 final release ?
Far from it. After we managed the huge chunk of technical work, we
still need to start working on all the not-so-fun process stuff around
it. Typical questions are:
- How do we find a
Hi.
I allowed myself to work on the Zope Toolkit over x-mas and make some
decisions to get some progress ;-)
The good news is that all our herculean efforts to unclutter the
dependency structures have really payed off. Only very few zope.*
packages still have dependencies on zope.app packages. I
Good morning :)
On Sun, Dec 27, 2009 at 5:11 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/12/27 Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu:
The Zope Toolkit is explicitly not a framework or application server -
it shouldn't contain any zope.app packages, neither directly nor as
test
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Godefroid Chapelle
got...@bubblenet.be wrote:
Jean-Francois and I made a few improvements to zope.schema.
Would it be possible to get a new release ?
You have a new 3.6.0 release up on PyPi.
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:21 PM, Godefroid Chapelle got...@bubblenet.be wrote:
On 22/12/09 15:09, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 12:01 PM, Godefroid Chapelle
got...@bubblenet.be wrote:
Jean-Francois and I made a few improvements to zope.schema.
You have a new 3.6.0 release
Hi Tres,
I've seen you started some work on Zope2 and its WSGI publisher. This
is awesome :)
How does this relate to repoze.zope2?
I'd love to have Zope2 actually support WSGI out-of-the-box. It should
probably be based on either a simplified repoze.zope2 codebase or
simply something that gets
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 5:33 PM, Godefroid Chapelle got...@bubblenet.be wrote:
On 22/12/09 17:23, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I also made the required changes in all the other Zope Toolkit
packages to the new testing output, released new versions of them all
and updated the ZTK.
This is a nice
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Godefroid Chapelle got...@bubblenet.be wrote:
Thanks for all details. I dunno if this is documented somewhere else.
If it is not, where could that be added to help newcomers ?
I didn't find something in the docs that explained this, so I wrote it down :)
The
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 10:48 PM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
I fixed the unit tests of the zope.interface package, which were broken by
the last release of zope.testing. Can somebody make a release, or give me
access to the PyPI package? My nickname is kobold.
I'd rather see a
On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 11:03 PM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
* 2009-12-22 22:54, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Isn't the new release emitting a deprecation warning? In this case, I'd fix
zope.interface (and all the other packages).
I'm not sure. I only work against the ZTK, which
Hi.
On Mon, Dec 21, 2009 at 9:34 PM, Fabio Tranchitella kob...@kobold.it wrote:
I've just committed a simple patch to allow extras in the eggs option of a
z3c.recipe.depgraph-based recipe.
Cool. I properly released 0.5 including your fix :)
Hanno
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 9:53 PM, Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
Could someone remind me if the bug happens during packing (and breaks
the .tgz for everyone, which gets noticed and fixed soon) or during
unpacking (and affects only a small percentage of users; those who still
use python
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Adam GROSZER agros...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess which were created by windowze people. It does zips by default.
Nope. I only create zips being on Mac OS.
With the tarfile module in Python 2.4 being utterly broken, I ran into
too much trouble with broken tar.gzips
On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
There used to be a section in the Advanced Zope Scripting chapter
which documented using External Methods: why is it gone now?
Looks like Hanno did this in r96569, 2009-02-15. I'm planning to revert
the parts of that
On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 3:38 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm certainly -1 on using the term in the ZCA. I think changing our
nomenclature would be terrible for the same reasons I think changing (as
opposed to extending/improving) our API would be terrible. Utilities are
in
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
We could also say that we will clean up the API when we move to Python
3. That is a natural breaking point anyway, so it will not any extra
pain for users of the ZCA.
Except that is precisely what the Python developers
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 5:09 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
* Use a different package name!
We don't have that option, as we're talking about changing the behavior
of calling IFoo.
It's very well possible. You create a new distribution
On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 12:14 PM, Martijn Faassen
faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Adam GROSZER wrote:
I had a feeling that adapter lookup can be alone slowish with lots of
registrations.
We had a large project that was cut in half and the z3c.form UI, which
is rather heavily adaptation based
On Wed, Nov 25, 2009 at 9:52 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Hmm, I may be missing something here, but if Foo implements IFoo, then
the getAdapter lookup for it will short circuit, leading you into
infinite recursion. Except that it doesn't:
[snip example]
which strikes me as
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 5:53 AM, Matthew Wilkes
matt...@matthewwilkes.co.uk wrote:
But, here is where the ZCA eyes come back into play, I wouldn't add
this to the ZCA itself. One reason being that Hanno's been working on
a more useful persistent component root for Zope that brings in bits
of
On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
There is, however, one thing I haven't quite worked out how to do is add
stuff to the instance's etc folder. We have some configuration files
which are instance specific which we have so far kept in in
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:44 AM, Charlie Clark
charlie.cl...@clark-consulting.eu wrote:
I'm about to migrate my first Zope to project to buildout. Does it matter
whether I use setuptools or distribute? And is there any preference for
one over the other?
Preference comes down to personal
On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
I am going one step further and propose to support officially only
Python 2.6
(and inofficially Python 2.5). Why? Right now it is possible writing
Zope 2.12
compatible add-ons that might use Python 2.6 feature. Another using
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:35 PM, Sebastien Douche sdou...@gmail.com wrote:
I use z3c.recipe.depgraph for our projects that use Zope3. The trouble
is depgraph use the working set to generate the list of eggs. It's not
what I want, (only eggs specified in the recipe and not all Zope3
eggs).
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 19, 2009 at 5:11 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
I added test for unregisterUtility, and fix the bug I encounter,
which happens only for utilities which inherit from Aquisition, and
have a physical path.
If you have time, I guess it's ready for a release.
I
Hi.
On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 8:26 AM, Takayuki Shimizukawa
shimizuk...@gmail.com wrote:
I want to use zope.container package w/ python-2.6 on Windows.
However, there is no configure.zcml (and a constraints.txt) in
zope.container-3.9.0-py2.6-win32.egg.
Maybe, this has failed in making the egg
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 5:22 AM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 12:54 AM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
Is standard_html_header standard_html_footer
removed in Zope 2.12 ?
It looks
On Tue, Oct 13, 2009 at 2:10 PM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
Is standard_html_header standard_html_footer
removed in Zope 2.12 ?
Yes. I cleaned up the default persistent content in 2.12. There's only
an index_html (now a page template instead of a dtml method), the
favicon.ico and a
On Mon, Oct 12, 2009 at 6:23 PM, Takeshi Yamamoto t...@mac.com wrote:
I would like to make this change effective as soon as possible.
So, hopefully to the 2.12.1.
There's both a maintenance branch for 2.12 and trunk (which will become 2.13).
I'm +1 on merging. It looks simple enough and I know
Hi Sylvain.
I'm including Michael here, who's added the mentioned feature in the
first place.
On Fri, Oct 9, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Sylvain Viollon sylv...@infrae.com wrote:
I used to use those features in Silva. It work well with 0.4, but
it's broken in 1.x. (I have tests in Silva testing
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:51 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
I know a lot of people are using testrecorder with Plone. That doesn't
mean it has to be in the ZTK of course.
Never heard of anyone who did. zope.testbrowser is used quite a bit,
if that's what you meant.
Hanno
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
If we do that, I'd also suggest we use the 'buildout.dumppickedversions'
extension.
Does that make sense? After all, if we say allow-picked-version is
false, there never will *be* any picked
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 5:15 PM, John Murphy jac...@zope.com wrote:
We recently were bit by a segfault bug in zope.security
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope3/+bug/181833) when migrating an
application from Python 2.4 to 2.6. The newest zope.security (3.7.1,
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com wrote:
So as a first step, I'd like to release the current code of
zope.publisher, zope.server, zope.app.authentication and zope.app.i18n.
Can somebody please grant me PyPI rights for these packages? Thank you
very much.
Granted :)
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 5:17 PM, Fred Drake fdr...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 11:10 AM, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
If someone would document srichter's magic grant-all-powerful PyPi
script, I'd run it :)
That's a horrible thing to do to somebody!
Note that I'm
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that we should remove this from ztk.cfg, as if we
publish this for reuse we don't want to impose this policy on everybody
who builds
On Tue, Oct 6, 2009 at 11:56 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Thomas Lotze wrote:
- zope.contenttype: parsing of MIME-type identifiers, guessing the MIME
type of file contents, preferrably without dependencies within the ZTK
Can I suggest that we use a different name?
Hi.
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd very much like a release of this. :)
Would anyone mind making a 3.5.1 release, or else give me PyPI rights so
that I can do it myself.
I gave you owner rights for this package.
Hanno
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 1:18 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Fabio Tranchitella wrote:
* 2009-10-05 12:15, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Would anyone mind making a 3.5.1 release, or else give me PyPI rights so
that I can do it myself.
Shouldn't this be 3.6.0?
I don't care one way
On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com wrote:
I see two options:
- make ztk.cfg available from zope.org (why docs.zope.org, btw?) under a
versioned URL
- release a ztk egg that depends on the exactly versioned packages
The latter is probably the more reusable.
I'd
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 2:13 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Is there any reason to invent a new API and not just use Python's file API?
I don't know. IReadFile and IWriteFile have been around for ever and are
used by a number of things in Zope
contributed to this release.
Special thanks to Tres Seaver for his tireless efforts in fixing bugs
and maintaining the Zope 2 codebase and Hanno Schlichting who worked
hard and steadfast on the eggification of Zope 2 and on the cleanup of
various dark corners of the Zope 2 codebase.
Thank you Andreas
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com wrote:
I also wonder whether it might make sense to utilise the /etc/mime.types
database (or the system's equivalent) for guessing based on the file-name
extension, and libmagic (if available) for magic-number tests based on
file
On Thu, Oct 1, 2009 at 6:09 PM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Yeah! I added the Windows binary eggs for Python 2.4 to 2.6 to PyPi.
Someone still needs to do this for:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/ExtensionClass/2.11.3
I would, but I don't have
On Wed, Sep 30, 2009 at 5:00 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Here's an initial take on the interfaces:
class IReadFile(Interface):
Provide read access to file data
def read():
Return the file data as a str
def size():
Return
On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 1:16 PM, Albertas Agejevas a...@pov.lt wrote:
About a year ago zope.app.catalog as been moved to zope.catalog. I
think during this move there was a unique opportunity to leave these
event handlers behind in zope.app.catalog, so that the no .app
version is free of these
On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi. I didn't get it done on the 17th, but I did just make a release with
the necessary fixes (or, the tests pass for me on Windows and Ubuntu, at
least; they already were passing for me on Ubuntu, but I made the
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 5:59 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Most of the remaining zope.app dependencies in the Zope2 trunk are
related to Products.five.form. I propose moving all that code out to a
new package, e.g. 'five.forms', which can be included by anybody who
uses that
On Fri, Sep 18, 2009 at 6:20 PM, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Sure: all the zope.app packages. They have effectively been in
probationary status for a while now; I'm proposing to remove them
completely from the ZTK.
I'd like to leave any zope.app.* package in the under-review
On Wed, Sep 16, 2009 at 3:53 AM, Gary Poster gary.pos...@gmail.com wrote:
The Ubuntu one should be easy to fix.
The Windows ones may be tied up with \n \r fun. It should be trivial too,
though I'll need to get a Windows VM back up--or request aid from Sidnei.
;-)
I'll address these issues
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:00 AM, Thomas Lotze t...@gocept.com wrote:
- Is Zope2 debug mode semantically equivalent to ZCML dev-mode, i.e.
should the two be linked to each other in the first place?
I don't know what kind of functionality is usually switched on by the
zcml dev-mode. Are there
Hi from the Grok sprint,
Jan-Jaap from thehealthagency and myself spent some time on getting
extensive buildbot coverage for the ZTK (and many other Zope things)
going. It's all three Python versions (2.4 - 2.6) on all major
platforms (Windows, Mac OS, 32-bit Ubuntu + 64-bit Ubuntu).
You can see
On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 4:54 PM, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
My plan is to release Zope 2.12.0 final on October 1st 2009.
Sounds good.
This will also be the official launch date of the new Zope 2 site.
Sounds even better.
Hanno
___
Zope-Dev
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 9:46 PM, Alex Chapmanachap...@zope.com wrote:
Log message for revision 103721:
keep trunk version at 0. Update changes
I think I've seen the practice of denoting the version on trunk as
zero from Jim already.
It is in conflict with
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 2:40 PM, Martijn Faassenfaas...@startifact.com wrote:
Christian Theune wrote:
However, this requires Subversion 1.5 which we are using on the server
already, but I don't know whether we assume clients are 1.5 or higher.
I certainly still use a SVN 1.4.x client, being on
On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 6:40 PM, Christian Theunec...@gocept.com wrote:
On 09/09/2009 05:05 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Okay, no objection to upgrading the server to 1.5 now.
That has been done a good while ago already (I was probably ambiguous in
my mail).
Damn, Jens is just doing too much of
On Sat, Aug 29, 2009 at 1:02 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
- What is the current version of ZTK? 1.0? 1.0-something? 3.5? Note
that docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit talks about 3.5.
To my knowledge the plan was to name the first ZTK release 1.0, to
avoid the confusion of it not
301 - 400 of 620 matches
Mail list logo
