On Mar 13, 2013, at 17:10 , Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
Visit: https://github.com/watching
Either unwatch all or selectively unwatch repositories you're not interested
in.
(If you stop watching all, there's a lot of clicking to then watch
repositories again.)
Uncheck autowatch
On Feb 11, 2013, at 11:53 , Marius Gedminas mar...@gedmin.as wrote:
Could someone with the magic admin bit please create Github repositories
for zope.tal and zope.testrunner?
Done.
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Jan 11, 2013, at 14:07 , Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
I noticed that the Zope2 git mirror does not appear to be updating. Looking
at https://github.com/zopefoundation/Zope/commits/2.13 it doesn't have any
commits after November 15, while subversion has more recent commits
On Jan 10, 2013, at 11:23 , Patrick Gerken do3cc...@googlemail.com wrote:
I wanted to fix some logging in Products.SiteErrorLog, but I am confused
where to go to.
zopefoundation on github has a small number of repos but not
Products.SiteErrorLog.
http://svn.zope.org shows me a web view
On Jan 10, 2013, at 14:37 , Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
For those packages that are fully migrated you will have obvious markers on
the package in svn.zope.org, such as the package being read-only.
I don't think
On Jan 10, 2013, at 14:45 , Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 8:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On Jan 10, 2013, at 14:37 , Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 5:48 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
For those packages
On Jan 10, 2013, at 15:40 , Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com
wrote:
I took a quick look at the Zope migration now and I think it's
excellent. The only thing I'd add is that I'd also migrate branches
2.12 and 2.13 branches since they're all active, even if just for
bug/security
On Jan 10, 2013, at 21:02, Matthew Wilkes matt...@matthewwilkes.co.uk wrote:
When Plone did this the people involved wrote some scripts
https://github.com/plone/svn-migrate
That stuff works only partially. It uses a GitHub API that has been removed
months ago.
I migrated the Zope package
On Dec 13, 2012, at 0:30 , Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
Getting distribution for 'persistent=4.0.0dev,4.1dev'. cc1.exe:
error: unrecognized command line option '-mno-cygwin' error: Setup
script exited with error: command 'gcc' failed with exit status 1 An
error occurred when
Foundation patch policy, binding for all Zope Foundation
contributors (PDF alert):
http://foundation.zope.org/agreements/ZopeFoundation_Patch_Policy.pdf
Jens Vagelpohl
--
Jens Vagelpohl
Secretary, Zope Foundation Board of Directors
[1]
http://plone.org/foundation/materials/foundation-resolutions
On Aug 20, 2012, at 8:18 , Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
a) Using Github is found to be quite attractive by lots of people.
b) We need to be diligent in maintaining the chain of custody of code so
the copyright situation is kept clean.
As far as I understand it, the legal
On Aug 19, 2012, at 0:01 , Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net wrote:
Hi Jens,
On 2012-08-18 07:49:59 +, Jens Vagelpohl said:
Hi Alex,
Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces from
Zope Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.
Thanks!
I
On Aug 19, 2012, at 3:58 , Alex Clark acl...@aclark.net wrote:
IANAL but from my perspective the legitimate issue here is that Domen Kožar
has not signed the Zope Contributor's Agreement, but Jim has added him to the
Buildout organization on GitHub and he has been committing fixes. If I
On Aug 19, 2012, at 10:17 , Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
And since it becomes ever easier to accept code from unknown sources (e.g.
pull requests) legal code ownership becomes an issue again.
And that returns me to my first question: Is it really legally
different for a
On Aug 19, 2012, at 10:55 , Robert Niederreiter r...@squarewave.at wrote:
https://github.com/Pylons/pyramid/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.txt
btw - pyramid seem to have a very pragmatic approach for the signing process
;)
An approach I doubt will hold up in a court of law. We require and have
Hi Alex,
Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces from Zope
Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.
Thanks!
jens
On Aug 18, 2012, at 3:09 , J. Alexander Clark cvs-ad...@zope.org wrote:
Log message for revision 127519:
Moved to github
of
the stable branch into the same place.
Hanno
On 18.08.2012, at 09:49, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Hi Alex,
Please revert this checkin. You can't just take core software pieces from
Zope Foundation-hosted repositories and move them somewhere else.
Thanks!
jens
On Aug 18, 2012, at 12:46 , Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 2012-8-18 10:39, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Hi Hanno,
Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as
official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub.
Doesn't the name
On Aug 18, 2012, at 14:31 , Jean-Paul Smets j...@nexedi.com wrote:
Hi,
I approve your position Jens.
Moving to git can make sense. Moving to github as primary platform does not
make sense.
Hi Jean-Paul,
Technical pros and cons are valid arguments, correct, but that wasn't my point
On Aug 18, 2012, at 15:46 , Lennart Regebro rege...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Legally this must be a fork then and I'm not sure it can be released as
official Zope Foundation software anymore if you make releases from GitHub
On Feb 1, 2012, at 00:05 , Alex Clark wrote:
Bottom line: Zope stands to benefit greatly if the current active developers
keep an open mind about how/where/when development of Zope software should
occur. There are plenty of people that still think Zope software is cool, and
plenty of
On Feb 1, 2012, at 15:53 , Charlie Clark wrote:
Currently the hurdle to getting involved is signing and sending the committer
agreement. A hurdle which I think is worth keeping.
For any code released under the Zope Foundation umbrella that hurdle cannot be
removed, anyway.
To be frank, I
Hi Chris,
For what it's worth, in the Pylons Project, we decided to continue
requiring the signing of a contributor's agreement (more or less the
same contributor agreement as Zope requires). But instead of signing
via paper, we ask that folks sign the contributor agreement by adding
their
On Jan 3, 2012, at 09:34 , Sylvain Viollon wrote:
We use Paster as well in the stack, and use it to configure the Python
logging process, you can configure
there a logging to syslog, and after having a central syslog server. I think
it is more professional like this,
than using a tool in
Hi Martin,
Sphinx on svn.zope.org works for me. :)
I have created a simple buildout and put it in SVN:
http://svn.zope.org/zope_secrets/
The output is shown at http://docs.zope.org/zope_secrets/ and linked from the
front page at http://docs.zope.org/. Every 6 hours, a cron job looks to see
On Dec 31, 2011, at 20:09 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi folks,
I have documented some of the darker corners of Zope's internals. I
put it in the Plone developer documentation for lack of a better
place, but it's not Plone-specific:
Hi Martin,
There *is* a better place, docs.zope.org. If you can tell me where the
sources are I can put it there.
Sure: Clone https://github.com/collective/collective.developermanual/
and get it from source/zope_secrets.
Thanks, I'll take a look at it today.
Where is docs.zope.org
On Jan 1, 2012, at 11:46 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Where is docs.zope.org maintained?
On one of the ZF servers.
If it's going to go there, I'd like it to (a) be in version control
and (b) be somewhere that I can edit it. Is that doable?
That's how we do it with almost everything underneath
Hi all,
I moved all mailing lists to a newer server this weekend. If anyone is noticing
any problems please talk to me off-list.
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or
On Oct 27, 2011, at 16:07 , Lennart Regebro wrote:
Do we really have to call it Zope 4? :-)
Yes.
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related
Hi Tom,
Further I have noticed two things:
1) Some pages are not recognized correctly and trigger a download (on
Firefox) or show the source code (on IE):
http://old.zope.org/Members/pje/Wikis/ZPatterns/HowTriggersWork.1
2) For some locations the folder contents are shown instead of
On Oct 17, 2011, at 16:08 , Tres Seaver wrote:
I would like to propose that we quit reporting test failures for the
unmaintained packages ('zc3.*', for a start. If somebody really
thinks there is value in such testing, we could perhaps run those
tests only weekly (like the others which have
Hi all,
Just as a heads-up: Jim Fulton and I have converted old.zope.org to a static
website. This allows ZC to decommission the hardware and reduces the
maintenance burden for everyone involved.
We have tried to keep all URLs intact and the site navigation working at the
same time, which
On Oct 11, 2011, at 03:33 , Alex Clark wrote:
Hi,
Anyone notice these missing tarballs?
- http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.9.12/Zope-2.9.12-final.tgz/
- http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.10.13/Zope-2.10.13-final.tgz/
- http://old.zope.org/Products/Zope/2.11.4/Zope-2.11.4-final.tgz/
On Oct 11, 2011, at 17:14 , Alex Clark wrote:
On 10/11/11 3:17 AM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
With the help of Jim, who produced a tarball containing the spidered content
of old.zope.org, the site has been converted to a static site. There will
inevitably be issues here and there. I'll take
On 7/6/11 13:41 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Concerning not marketing Zope 2, heh, Zope and marketing strategies? I
thought we were going to call Zope 2, Zope now, so people will
obviously be curious about this Zope thing... Never make any assumptions
about a coherent Zope marketing strategy! I'll
On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or
5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better at all. So 3.0 is the
most sensible one :)
Boy, that's going to be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/29/11 08:51 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
My question would be: why launchpad? Is anyone expecting launchpad to be
a canonical resource for Zope releases? As far as I know none of our
documentation refers to launchpad for downloads and launchpad
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/29/11 10:20 , Andreas Jung wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I kept wondering why Launchpad even came up for Zope2 download
resources. I don't recall a discussion where that was decided. PyPI and
zope.org are still the canonical locations
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/29/11 10:34 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 8:51 AM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
My question would be: why launchpad? Is anyone expecting launchpad to be
a canonical resource for Zope releases? As far as I know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/10/11 07:28 , Alex Clark wrote:
- Zope is: a brand, a term for any Zope-related technology, a general
term. It no longer refers to anything specific. It is all-encompassing.
- Zope 2 is the original web application server.
- Bluebream is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/10/11 11:52 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'd call 'Application servers', which is mostly a term from Java land,
web frameworks instead, because that's what Python developers will
understand, and put Zope, BlueBream and Grok under it. If it sorts
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/10/11 22:31 , Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
I found a link off the new site (which looks great, btw) to:
http://zodb.zope.org/
...but this name doesn't resolve for me, does it for other people?
The link is incorrect. It should point to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 5/11/11 02:04 , Alex Clark wrote:
Hi,
On 5/10/11 5:38 AM, Lennart Regebro wrote:
On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 09:15, Jens Vagelpohlj...@dataflake.org wrote:
I strongly disagree on the term Zope 2. Now is a great time to finally
stop the Zope2/3
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/19/11 08:52 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Hello,
while making projects in SVN complying to the repository policy I found files
which tell that their license is Zope Visible Source License, Version 1.0
(ZVSL).
Is this license a valid license in
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/19/11 15:19 , Jim Fulton wrote:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 3:39 AM, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/19/11 08:52 , Michael Howitz wrote:
Hello,
while making projects in SVN complying
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/3/11 12:41 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 3/29/11 11:15 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
But it seems like it's about bugging Stephan Holek to stop the current
one and bugging Jens to start the new one, or? Unless the script is broken.
Could you run
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4/4/11 08:37 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 4/3/11 12:41 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 3/29/11 11:15 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
But it seems like it's about bugging Stephan Holek to stop the current
one and bugging Jens to start the new one, or? Unless
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 3/29/11 11:15 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
But it seems like it's about bugging Stephan Holek to stop the current
one and bugging Jens to start the new one, or? Unless the script is broken.
Could you run that script -- worst case we'll have 2 mails
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/1/10 08:59 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2010-12-1 07:43, Christian Theune wrote:
Here's the draft we ended up with yesterday:
http://dpaste.com/281566/
Can you move the non-OK results above the list of reports received? That
way you have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/1/10 09:28 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 12/1/10 09:04 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 12/1/10 08:59 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 2010-12-1 07:43, Christian Theune wrote:
Here's the draft we ended up with yesterday:
http://dpaste.com/281566/
Can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/30/10 16:06 , Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
here's a shot at a new format of the aggregated mails.
My focus on this draft was:
- allow dealing with *lots* of results every day more easily
- allow having a graphical overview of how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/1/10 07:43 , Christian Theune wrote:
On 11/30/2010 06:04 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Looks good to me, much better than what we have now. I'm guessing the
URLs will be fixed to point to http://mail.zope.org... instead of
file:///tmp
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/28/10 12:29 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
- zopectl start - doen't work (https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/628448)
- Zope2 egg is not available in index
(https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/653546)
Both of these have been resolved now.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/6/10 18:33 , Tres Seaver wrote:
+1 for dropping the test: if we aren't going to try to fix it to pass,
then scrap it. Note that I actually feel the same way about *all* the
every-day failures: the value of the every-day mail drops sharply
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/30/10 21:16 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 03:04:09PM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 9/30/10 14:37 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
Can someone with admin access add a daily cron script to
cd /path/to/ztk/doc/sources
touch
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/1/10 10:22 , Charlie Clark wrote:
Hi,
I'll admit to spending most of my time on new CMF stuff but I did close
two bugs that I felt comfortable with. Didn't seem anyone else was hanging
around on IRC with bugfixing on their mind.
I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/30/10 14:37 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit/process/buildbots.html shows a very
neatly organized overview of the status of various buildbots.
There's only one problem: the content is outdated (Last updated on Sep
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I worked on the following bugs:
Already fixed
=
https://bugs.launchpad.net/products.zsqlmethods/+bug/440993
Fixed
=
https://bugs.launchpad.net/products.zsqlmethods/+bug/142689
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/25/10 21:32 , Vladislav Vorobiev wrote:
ps: my normal email for this mailings list is **mymir@gmail.com**. I
subscribe the list and get emails but I can't send anything. No mail
from mymir@gmail.com was accept
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/19/10 09:46 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Can roles currently contain whitespace? Like Awesome People?
If so, we should go for nested nodes:
permission id=my.NewPermission title=My new permission
roleManager/role
roleSiteAdmin/role
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/9/10 08:58 , Baiju M wrote:
On Thu, Apr 8, 2010 at 8:39 PM, Baiju M mba...@zeomega.com wrote:
Hi,
What about retiring zope3-checkins list ?
I send this sometimes back. What needs to be
done to retire this list ? I think there are few
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/5/10 00:16 , Willi Langenberger wrote:
According to Jens Vagelpohl:
before=$(svn info $ROOT | grep ^Last Changed Rev: | cut -d -f 4)
svn up -q $ROOT
after=$(svn info $ROOT | grep ^Last Changed Rev: | cut -d -f 4)
I think
svn info
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Chris,
I've just been doing some build and release tools for a customer that
involve this sort of stuff, I resorted to:
snip lots of code
Yikes. Maybe the subshell isn't so bad after all :-P
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 10:52 , Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi.
On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 10:31 AM, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
I'm in the process of egg-ifying some Zope 2 Products of mine (first up
is MailTemplates) and I'm curious as to how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 11:33 , Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I've just been doing some build and release tools for a customer that
involve this sort of stuff, I resorted to:
snip lots of code
Yikes. Maybe the subshell isn't so bad after all :-P
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 14:55 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 11:09:58AM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 8/4/10 10:57 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello Jens,
Something is wrong with the automatic update of
http://docs.zope.org/zopetoolkit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/4/10 17:26 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I'm wondering: can it be made to skip useless docs such as
http://docs.zope.org/zope.hookable/index.html, perhaps by checking for
linecount?
There are also a lot of packages that only have a changelog
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Brian,
Do you have access to an source distribution (tarball or zip) for the
package involved?
In the source distribution the PKG-INFO file is always at the top level.
No, these are trunk checkouts.
jens
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/3/10 00:19 , Tres Seaver wrote:
The 'pkginfo' utility knows how to extract package metadata from stuff
installed on the path:
http://packages.python.org/pkginfo/distributions.html#introspecting-installed-packages
as well as from
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 15:51 , Stephan Richter wrote:
We have put a lot of energy into putting the full documentation of packages
into the package's long description and most packages have this layout (I
know, because I did it for most. ;-) So it might be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/3/10 22:59 , Marius Gedminas wrote:
On Tue, Aug 03, 2010 at 10:42:42PM +0200, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
listing, like the ZTK list[1]. I had to resort to executing setup.py
--long-description in a subprocess, unfortunately. Never found out how
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Martijn,
http://docs.zope.org/zope.event/
Really cool!
Wouldn't it be good to put this under /package/zope.event to avoid
potential naming conflicts? I realize they're rare, but I can imagine
that a project foo could exist that wants to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 14:00 , Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list.
Period Sun Aug 1 12:00:00 2010 UTC to Mon Aug 2 12:00:00 2010 UTC.
There were 91 messages: 6 from Zope Tests, 1 from buildbot at
enfoldsystems.com, 4
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 15:51 , Stephan Richter wrote:
We have put a lot of energy into putting the full documentation of packages
into the package's long description and most packages have this layout (I
know, because I did it for most. ;-) So it might be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 16:36 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday, August 02, 2010, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
'll have to look at that. Currently, the documentation builder does not
do any introspection on the package itself, mostly because I do not want
to fully
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 16:48 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday, August 02, 2010, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Thanks for the hint, I'll try that. Can you give me a sample package
where the long description is supposed to be the main documentation? And
what's
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 16:50 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday, August 02, 2010, Stephan Richter wrote:
py26 setup.py --long-description | rst2html
rst2html have many options that allow you to modify the style, including
the ability to specify a stylesheet.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 17:00 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday, August 02, 2010, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
OK, I'll see what I can do with that. I'll probably end up using the
long description as last fallback. So you will see every package linked
to *something
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 16:36 , Stephan Richter wrote:
On Monday, August 02, 2010, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
'll have to look at that. Currently, the documentation builder does not
do any introspection on the package itself, mostly because I do not want
to fully
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 8/2/10 18:26 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
http://packages.python.org/distribute/pkg_resources.html
You can probably create a Distribution object somehow (handwave) from a
path (whether that's the path of the package or the path the package is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
Here's a followup on a docs.zope.org automation task I took over during
one of the Zope developer IRC metings[1]. The task was to provide
individual package documentation, if it exists, directly underneath
docs.zope.org, e.g.:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/29/10 15:57 , yuppie wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Jul 29, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Martin Aspelioptilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 29 July 2010 20:14, yuppiey.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Sure. But do you always run all tests it picks
I cannot access the files. Apparently you must have a Google account and log in
:-(
jens
On Jul 17, 2010, at 19:26, Takeshi Yamamoto t...@mac.com wrote:
On Jul 16, 2010, at 3:28 PM, Christian Theune wrote:
- We need to deal with the fact that some projects in svn.zope.org are
likely
tested with different browsers without login and I could download
files.
Google account should not be required.
Do you mean you cannot see the listing of files when you accessed to that URL
in your browser?
Takeshi
On Jul 18, 2010, at 6:08 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
I cannot access
of download
link.
The download link is located just under the file name per file.
Takeshi
On Jul 18, 2010, at 7:07 PM, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Hi Takeshi,
I can see the listing but when I click on a file download link I get a page
saying insufficient privileges. You must be logged in to view
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/14/10 16:28 , Wichert Akkerman wrote:
On 7/14/10 16:19 , Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Log message for revision 114741:
- LP #143533: Instead of showing 0.0.0.0 as server name when no
specific listening IP is configured for the HTTP server
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/14/10 17:00 , Andreas Jung wrote:
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I don't mind doing this for a SERVER_NAME in the response, but looking
at the diff from the commit email you also changed the startup message
from Zope 2 with this change. That is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I worked on Zope2 bugs today. This is what I managed to get done:
Fixed
=
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/143273
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/143564
- https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/143722
-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/6/10 17:53 , Christian Theune wrote:
So, next Wednesday (2010-07-14) is the next bug day. Here's a wiki page
so you can also register there to indicate participation:
http://wiki.zope.org/ztk/BugDay20100714
I'll not that the simple table you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/4/10 10:41 , Adam GROSZER wrote:
Hello Shane,
Are you the list admin there or you know who it is?
Hi Adam,
I just looked and Shane's no longer working zope.com address was listed
as the only admin. I put myself in instead.
Do you need me
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/1/10 17:36 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 1 July 2010 21:10, Godefroid Chapelle got...@bubblenet.be wrote:
http://packages.python.org/z3c.form
Who will get rid of http://docs.zope.org/z3c.form/ ?
If you do, can you please make it link or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/24/10 09:30 , Chris Withers wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
The misconfiguration of the mail host in transactional mode *does* cause
the server to go into a lockdown mode (because errors are not supposed
to be raised in 'tpc_finish'). There is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Unknown to the Zope Foundation and the ZF admins it appears the zope.org
and zopefoundation.org domains have expired. The domains were held by
Rob Page as Zope Corporation representative.
For community members this means services like the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I worked on Zope2 bugs today. This is what I managed to get done:
Fixed
=
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/143946
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/374818
https://bugs.launchpad.net/zope2/+bug/142535
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 6/3/10 16:29 , Tres Seaver wrote:
Zope Tests Summarizer wrote:
Subject: FAILED : Zope Buildbot / zope2.12 slave-osx
From: jdriessen at thehealthagency.com
Date: Wed Jun 2 09:33:54 EDT 2010
URL:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reminder:
Today at 20:00 UTC (less than 12 hours from now) one of the Zope
Foundation-maintained servers will be physically moved to a different
data center by our hosting provider. The server will be shut down at
around 20:00 UTC and, according to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please note:
First of all, apologies for the cross-posting. I wanted to reach as many
people as possible.
On Thursday, May 27 (2 days from now) one of the Zope
Foundation-maintained servers will be physically moved to a different
data center by our
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reminder:
In about 3.5 hours one of the Zope Foundation-maintained
servers will be physically moved to a different data center by our
hosting provider. The server will be shut down at around 20:00 UTC and,
according to the hosting provider, become
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Please note:
First of all, apologies for the cross-posting. I wanted to reach as many
people as possible.
On Monday, May 10 (tomorrow) one of the Zope Foundation-maintained
servers will be physically moved to a different data center by our
hosting
1 - 100 of 434 matches
Mail list logo
