On 25 Oct 2005, at 07:19, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi All,
Has MessageDialog gone away or has it just moved?
cheers,
Chris
grep is your friend?
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No
On 10 Oct 2005, at 08:58, Chris Withers wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote:
Argh...there is also a gadfly package coming from Zope 3. So when
we remove it from the Zope 2 core we get it back with Zope 3 :-)
Well, having a lightweight semi-functional rdb engine in the distro
has always seemed
Both those tests point to a wrong user running them, most likely due
to some tests switching users and then not cleaning up properly.
jens
On 4 Oct 2005, at 11:38, Florent Guillaume wrote:
The OFS.testObjectManager tests are failing when run in isolation
on the Zope 2 trunk (also on the
My understanding (and the way we use it when monkey patching for
instance) is that whenevery you apply new security to a class, you
create a new ClassSecurityInfo on it. It only defines new stuff
to do. The real synthesized security is still stored in
__ac_permissions__.
Yes, your
I have found a strange security issue with Zope 2.8.1 that seems to
stem from code not doing what it was supposed to do in Zope 2.7.x,
but which works in 2.8.1 and then causes other side effects in code
that relied on the broken behavior.
Symptom: In Zope 2.8.1 it is *impossible* to
On 22 Aug 2005, at 21:55, Michael Dunstan wrote:
On 8/22/05, Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are we sure that we won't be breaking the rather large possible
set of
installed servers running behind Apache 1.3.x with the bug for which
adding the content length was a workaround?
I
On 22 Aug 2005, at 07:53, Aruna Kathiria wrote:
Hello Everyone:
Is it possible to use Python 2.4 with Zope 2.7.6 on windows plateform?
I come to know how to use them on UNIX from /doc/INSTALL.txt but
don't know how to install and use Python 2.4 and Zope 2.7.6 on
windows platform.
By
Hi everyone,
I'd like to get the zserver-content-length.patch createed by dunny in
this collector issue:
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1866/collector_issue_contents
merged into the Zope 2.7/2.8 branches and the trunk. It ensures that
certain classes of responses (e.g. 304) correctly
On 4 Aug 2005, at 01:01, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Hi,
I've started the lra-userid_username_separation-branch (from
Zope-2_8-branch to start from a stable point) in order to implement
proper userid/username separation in Zope.
Chris McDonough did most of that for Zope 2.7 already a
On 3 Jul 2005, at 15:16, Chris McDonough wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-03 at 09:13 +0200, Andreas Jung wrote:
Alpha and beta releases are fine for major releases. Beta releases
for a
minor release can be made if there are some changes or fixes that
must be
tested by people.
Any comments?
+1
On 1 Jul 2005, at 04:58, Fred Drake wrote:
Since using an additional configuration file is possible (and quite
easy in Zope 2, since the location of the instance is so easy to
discern, I'm not convinced it's actually important to support
embedding the configuration for 3rd-party components into
On 1 Jul 2005, at 17:15, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Here's something else that would be nice: PAS.
Although it hasn't been tested much, so we should include it as
early as
possible in the 2.9 cycle (i.e., why not now ? :)
Maybe not right at this moment... but I would like to see that, too.
On 27 Jun 2005, at 22:27, Dirk Datzert wrote:
Hi,
this is my solution for SSO for Zope by accepting SAP-SSO-Ticket.
Apart from the fact that directly patching an existing product is
never a good idea (subclass and override as needed is a much better
solution) the creation of external
On 26 Jun 2005, at 14:57, Dirk Datzert wrote:
One question about PAS/LDAPMultiPlugin and LDAPUserFolder/
LDAPUserSatellite:
We work a lot with LDAPUserSatellite in different Folders, which
will change
local roles of users. Is this also possible with PAS/LDAPMultiPlugin ?
No it is not. It
I'm looking now for the best way to integrate/rewrite
CookieCrumbler/LDAPUserFolder to take the validated Login-Name and
read the
roles of the user out of the LDAP-directory.
What *specifically* does not work? Have you tried it and developed a
list of features that are missing for it to
I'd be happy if this was *all* that changed in Zope 2.9. This way
we can release Zope 2.9 in the forseeable future, like, late this
year. If Zope 3 is on track there will already be a Zope 3.2
release imminent by then, but I'm okay with Zope 2.x running a
version behind in the name of
On 4 Jun 2005, at 08:07, Balazs Ree wrote:
Now I would like to pose a question to all of you. I am of course not
worried if Mount.py is getting phased out completely, since I would be
able to take over the code from it into my subclass. But according
to my
use case described above, am I on
On May 30, 2005, at 20:39, Chad Whitacre wrote:
Thanks, that's what I figured. ;-)
IIRC the last time I did something like that (moving CMF to ZPL 2.1)
I wrote a python script to replace the text appropriately... sed
and awk are also good tools for that when you're good at shell
On May 13, 2005, at 10:30, Andreas Jung wrote:
--On Freitag, 13. Mai 2005 18:02 Uhr +1000 Dylan Jay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess its not critical but its unhelpful due to
a) Its nicer to users to upgrade products via refresh rather to
bounce
the server
Refresh is a tool thought for
On May 14, 2005, at 02:10, Simon Michael wrote:
Go Dieter!
Hey Simon, Dieter isn't looking for a fan club, he is looking for
champions in the right places to integrate his work so it benefits a
wider audience! ;)
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On May 10, 2005, at 12:06, Zope User wrote:
Is there a zope product that will allow me to create an online test
tool?
Thanks!
RT
Hi Zope User,
online test tool is a very meaningless description. I suggest you
describe in more detail what you're looking for.
jens
On Apr 26, 2005, at 2:22, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Technical details of permanent failure:
PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 553 5.3.0 Spam blocked see:
http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?64.233.184.203
Yeah this goes to show that you have to be extremely careful in
On Apr 25, 2005, at 20:46, Christian Heimes wrote:
Tim Hicks wrote:
Apologies if this is already known about...
I just installed 2.8.0b1 (using python 2.3.5), fired it up, then
tried to
add a 'plone site' (2.0.5). The plone site actually did get added,
but
here's what I got as well:
For the
On Apr 23, 2005, at 14:30, Andreas Jung wrote:
Any objections to move BTreeFolder2 into the Zope core for Zope 2.8?
BTF is widely used in the Zope, CMF Plone world and it would not
hurt
to ship it with Zope.
+1
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Apr 20, 2005, at 15:50, Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
From what I understand it prevents the installation/writing of a
product into the ZODB (the products management part of the
Control_Panel) and thus prevents conflict errors. If the product is
already installed (e.g
On Apr 18, 2005, at 16:25, Chris Withers wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
What happens if you turn this off in all zeo clients?
New products don't get installed..?
Okay, but what does installed mean?
Would it actually stop new instances of object classes provided by the
product being instantiated
On Apr 15, 2005, at 18:38, Alan Milligan wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm astounded that nobody has come across this before, but the
CMFCore.TypesTool.constructContent() function is supposed to return the
object id in the event that no RESPONSE is passed in - at least
On Apr 8, 2005, at 11:00, Chris Withers wrote:
Hi,
There's an option to turn off prudct installation in zope.conf.
What happens if you turn this off in all zeo clients?
New products don't get installed..?
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Apr 7, 2005, at 1:45, Florent Guillaume wrote:
After spending an hour helping someone debug a site that had an hidden
SiteRoot somewhere that prevented a virtual host monster from working,
it was suggested to me that if there's a virtual host monster, it
should take precedence (and
On Apr 7, 2005, at 6:50, Andreas Jung wrote:
Even small modifications to the security machinery tend to
end up in lots of problems.
The latest prominent example: the changes introduced with
Zope 2.7.3: It took two releases (until 2.7.5) and
more than 6 months (at least in my memory) before
On Apr 7, 2005, at 9:08, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2005, 01:45 +0200 schrieb Florent Guillaume:
After spending an hour helping someone debug a site that had an hidden
SiteRoot somewhere that prevented a virtual host monster from working,
it was suggested to me that if there's
On Apr 6, 2005, at 14:11, Santi Camps wrote:
Hi all,
I'm just trying recent Zope 2.8 a2 and I'm not able to import any
.zexp file. At the begin I thought that it could be caused by the
zexp I was trying to import, but default Examples.zexp also cause the
same error. I've tried with and
On Apr 6, 2005, at 15:00, Tim Peters wrote:
LOL looks like someone left a pdb.set_trace() in the
ZODB.Connection.modifiedInVersion method...
Yup, that got checked in by mistake during the recent ZODB sprint at
PyCon.
It's repaired on Zope trunk / ZODB 3.4a2, so try the trunk instead.
Another
On Apr 6, 2005, at 17:50, Tim Peters wrote:
[Jens Vagelpohl]
So I was clicking through svn.zope.org trying to find the ZODB code in
question but couldn't, simply because I did not know what tag/branch
the version stitched into Zope 2.8a2 is. How can you tell from looking
at the Zope code on http
On Mar 28, 2005, at 21:03, Christian Heimes wrote:
PageTemplates have an undocumented features called defer:. It's a kind
of lazy initialization of variables.
I've fixed to issues in my tiran-zpt-pydefer branch (svn):
* DeferWrappers weren't working inside a python expression because
* I realize Zope 2.7.x is clearly a maintenance branch (from Zope's
POV),
but also a trunk branch from the POV of Plone (and therefore from
mine
wink)
At this point we all know that Zope 2.8 will bring *a lot of changes*.
There might be quite a few people (including the whole Plone community)
- It *will be* the responsibility of the Zope 2 devs to
make sure Z2 works with the version of Z3 bundled at the
time.
snip
It'd be great if active Z3 developers could actually help make new
releases of Z2 once Five is integrated but the above makes it sound
like
a we'll throw it over
- the
credentials thus end up in the session and the standard sessioning
cookie is the random ticket.
jens
---
Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer +49-(0)441-36 18 14 38
Zetwork GmbHhttp://www.zetwork.com
On Dec 13, 2004, at 17:15, Florent Guillaume wrote:
Can we have instead:
def getUserById(self, id, default=_marker):
Return the user corresponding to the given id.
Raises a KeyError if the user does not exist and no default
is provided.
user =
However, RedHat have now released Python 2.4 in the Fedora development
stream and it will ship with FC4.
Does ZC have an official position upon this yet?
Speaking as Zope release manager but not as official of ZC: Python
2.3.4
will likely be the recommended Python version for Zope 2.7. I am
However, having to fork off the main Fedora branch in regard to Python
dependencies (which directly affect Anaconda, up2date, GTK, and most of
the desktop applets) has major implications for how we maintain our
distro.
As Andreas said, there is no forking involved. You should have a
separate
Also if this is the wrong list for this topic please tell me which is
the correct list.
Since SpeedPack is a Plone-related add-on I would assume your question
belongs on a Plone mailing list. See http://www.plone.org.
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On Oct 27, 2004, at 15:49, Jim Fulton wrote:
Below is a proposed policy on backward compatibility for Zope.
Zope Policy on Backward Compatibility
=
snip
+1, even regardless of its actual content. Having a policy at all is a
lot better than the I gotta ask X
---
Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer Zope - done medium rare
Zetwork GmbHhttp://www.zetwork.com/
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org
On Oct 17, 2004, at 18:13, Matt Hamilton wrote:
Hi All,
I'm having some trouble getting python2.3.4 running on FreeBSD 5.3b7
on an AMD Opteron, so for kicks tried python2.4rc3. It managed to
pass the recursion regex test in test_re.py that was causing
python2.3.4 to barf, but in trying to
-
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
---
Jens Vagelpohl
Loads nice and fast right now for me. But then again it's 2 AM EST...
jens
On Sep 9, 2004, at 23:59, Jim Fulton wrote:
After updating all of the relevent libraries, I decided to try
reenabling ViewCVS
for a while to see if the behavior is any more stable.
Jim
That's an interesting question. What is the unit test policy if I
change/improve a part of the Zope code that has no unit tests at all.
Would I be expected to create unit tests for the whole thing all of a
sudden?
In another post Tres' likened doing so to supererogation
On Aug 29, 2004, at 16:03, Christian Theune wrote:
Am So, den 29.08.2004 schrieb Christian Theune um 15:37:
Ack. Stuff is on it's way.
Done. The error log improvement is there. Thanks for the quick support.
You published your nagios scripts somewhere, right? I'm interested.
jens
Due to the fact that this is a feature and the code provides no unit
test infrastructure (and I don't have the time to start doing that for
the error log) I'd like to know what the general rule for Zope 2 is, If
I want to make improvements to existing code that isn't covered by unit
tests at all.
Even using BTreeFolder to store all objects I was getting 300s
delay to show a single object (ok, it's an archetypes-based one,
containing 50 fields, splitted into 7 schematas, with lots of
fancy stuff...). So I made a directory hash structure based on
UID from each object (an AT UID is md5, so we
When we tried to upload objects from wikipedia's sqldump of after about
40,000 objects in a folder the script went for a toss. roughly each
time
we ran the script the same problem. even to visit the folder of even
1000 objects through ZMI is a pain. I think that is where BTreeFolder2
will be
Am 2. Mai 2004 um 13:28 schrieb Dieter Maurer:
Willi Langenberger wrote at 2004-5-2 17:10 +0200:
...
The reason is the way python handles threads on some systems
(RedHat-7.3, kernel 2.4.20, without NPTL).
What is NPTL?
The native posix thread library or something like that. It's a new
threading
On Apr 2, 2004, at 7:06, AP Meyer wrote:
Is this a known bug?
Working without automatic refresh is very unhandy ;-)
thanks
Andre
Refresh is *not* a solution for everything because of the gyrations it
has to go through to force the refreshing effect. Not everything will
work with it, period.
Please post this in the Collector at http://zope.org/Collectors/Zope
jens
On Mar 22, 2004, at 7:09, AP Meyer wrote:
Hi Zopers
It seems that there is a bug in ZTUtil.Batch: when the batch should be
the length of the batch and there are exactly as many orphans as there
would fit on one page
write server itself not very hard, i simply don't want patch
ZServer/components.xml
is there any way don't touch Zserver?
probably not.
jens
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Zope does not need ESI support - You can write ESI statements in your
templates without specific support from Zope.
jens
On Jan 12, 2004, at 8:57, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
Any news on Zope support for ESI?
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope-dev/2003-January/018619.html
Zope does not need ESI support - You can write ESI statements in
your
templates without specific support from Zope.
jens
Does ZC use ESI in production? Maybe some experiences regarding
caching?
Not yet, no. We are waiting for more stable Squid releases before using
Squid3. We're also working
Dunno about any such plans right now, but that doesn't mean it won't
happen, especially when it has become stable in Squid itself.
jens
On Jan 12, 2004, at 20:08, Bjorn Stabell wrote:
Jens:
Zope does not need ESI support - You can write ESI statements in
your templates without specific support
But I realized that what you actually might want is to have different
login
and password for each user, that is a possibility to pass username +
password to send(). And maybe you want a setting to allow this or not.
Or is this overkill? What do you think?
IMHO, YAGNI. Besides, a lot of
If you need anything CMF specific use the portal_url tool. I do not
see why a basic infrastructure method like absolute_url() should know
anything about portals at all.
I have to admit I did not look deeply, but Stefan's notion that
absolute_url is a basic infrastructure method that should not
cvs.zope.org seems to have locked up, we're looking into it
jens
On Oct 27, 2003, at 12:39, Sidnei da Silva wrote:
Howdy folks,
Im trying to cvs up and get the latest changes on CMF 1.4, but it just
does time out. Any clue?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/src/cmf/1_4$ cvs up
ssh: connect to host
cvs.zope.org had a problem with its hardware RAID controller today that
required manual intervention. In order to solve what we think is the
main cause we are going to have a downtime from 4PM EST until about
4:30 PM EST today to remove some dodgy hard drives.
jens
... disk removal took a little longer than expected but we're back to
normal now.
jens
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
** No cross posts or HTML encoding! **
(Related lists -
Hi everyone,
The issue collectors formerly hosted on collector.zope.org have been
migrated to the main zope.org website and are now available at the
following address::
http://www.zope.org/Collectors/
I have tried to find all links to these collectors, but there might be
old links in various
Already fixed.
jens
On Thursday, Oct 23, 2003, at 14:58 US/Eastern, Andreas Jung wrote:
When I look at the default search results for the Zope collector then
the latest
pending issue has been filed in May which is nearly impossible. There
must be something
wrong.
Andreas
Just a quick heads-up:
This morning we noticed some odd activity on cvs.zope.org that looked
like someone had broken into the machine. We have shut the machine down
completely and are in the process of installing new drives and doing a
fresh install from the ground up. Then we will start
In the case of empty Etags, I think that sending an empty header has
been shown to be the wrong choice. I suggest it should be removed
from the head and the 2_7 branch.
For future reference to any committers: if you modify any HTTP headers
sent by Zope, you very likely ought to discuss it
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
Along with that the MS Author Via header garbage should at least be
governed by some configuration flag.
No, no, no, you're not seeing the bigger picture... you don't need
configuration flags for any of that stuff. It just shouldn't exist,
period. If people need to clutter
I know, I was just trying to figure out how this was supposed to work.
Currently setting Last-Modified seems to be the only way to get
something cached in Apache; Expires alone is no good, and adding an
Etag
header doesn't seem to have any effect either. Maybe this should be
classified as an
Well, to at least reduce the immediate pressure, why don't you throw
more RAM into that server? Memory is cheap.
jens
On Friday, Aug 22, 2003, at 17:38 US/Eastern, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
wrote:
Hi,
For a long time now, one of our clients, running Zope 2.5.1, has been
experiencing memory
what exactly is it you are trying to achieve? maybe someone can help if
you let us know what the real motivation is.
jens
On Saturday, Mar 8, 2003, at 11:42 US/Eastern, Sondre Rønjom wrote:
Ive been looking through AccessControl/User.py to understand the
validate() methods paramteres. Im not
hm... i could have told you that the LDAPUser class in the
LDAPUserFolder product can do that but i had the whole thread mostly
tuned out. initially it did not look like anything i could help with
and the first posting was very long if i remember correctly.
jens
On Thursday, Mar 6, 2003, at
the ZLDAPConnection product has not seen any active maintenance in more
than 2 years now. i am sure it does not handle referrals.
jens
On Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003, at 02:51 US/Eastern, Jean Jordaan wrote:
Hi Jeffrey all
I'd just like to check something ..
When running LDAP in a master/slave
i think in general you will not get much support from anybody when it
comes to exotic unices like AIX. there isn't many people who try to
make it work.
jens
On Friday, Feb 21, 2003, at 21:12 US/Eastern, Jamie Heilman wrote:
There never was an answer from anybody.
Thats probably because nobody
how about you change your code so it attempts to download both .tgz and
.tar.gz?
jens
On Monday, Nov 25, 2002, at 09:03 US/Eastern, Andrew Sydelko wrote:
On Mon, 25 Nov 2002 13:56:34 + Chris Withers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andrew Sydelko wrote:
Ok, whoever is in charge of zope.com
+1 from me... most other PluginIndexes already fail gracefully when
something to be unindexed has disappeared. IMHO all indexes should
behave that way.
jens
On Thursday, Nov 21, 2002, at 08:24 US/Eastern, seb bacon wrote:
Anyone object to me changing PathIndex so it swallows exceptions and
Depends on your needs. ZCTextIndex is very easy to use and supports
relevance
ranking, TextIndexNG is supposed to be some kind of
eier-legende-wollmilch-sau.
Compare the features and make your choice.
-aj
isn't TextIndexNG much better with international character encodings
and that stuff?
I would like to create a Page Counter product that doesn't bloat. If a
product is created that doesn't subclass History or UndoSupport does it
still bloat?
those have nothing to do with the fact that every time that hit counter
fires some object will get updated and thus saved again.
Zope is
why is that code no longer referring to the real userfolder anymore? it
should not make calls to authorize/identify/authorize on self but on
the LDAPUserFolder it is using as the user source.
jens
On Thursday, Oct 17, 2002, at 03:39 US/Eastern, Dirk Datzert wrote:
Hi all,
I try to solve
being explicit is almost always better. you are relying on internal
magic and it's not apparent from looking at the code you wrote.
the validate implementation in the LDAPRoleExtender is the most
correct one. shane worked on it for a while to make sure it does the
most correct thing possible,
conflict errors do not imply conflicting writes by definition. there is
a thing called read conflict, which is probably what happens to you.
jens
On Friday, Oct 11, 2002, at 07:47 US/Eastern, Stefan H. Holek wrote:
Hi All!
I am experiencing a lot of 'ZODB conflict error at ...' that I can
extremely expensive. you would have to...
- assemble a list of all objects IDs in the ZODB
and then...
- parse all contents of all objects and check against that ID list.
you would probably need a little counter for every single ID that gets
incremented upon finding its ID referenced, and
sorry for the crossposting, here's a little heads-up for the mac OS X
crowd:
upon upgrading to 10.2 (jaguar) you will most likely find that your
python binary (along with most other self-compiled software) is broken.
in the case of python a simple re-build (if you compiled from source,
that
well, the basic cause is worse than that: they moved symbols around
between system libraries.
jens
On Monday, Aug 26, 2002, at 12:11 US/Eastern, Barry A. Warsaw wrote:
JV == Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
JV sorry for the crossposting, here's a little heads-up
... which doesn't help people trying to run a current zope source
release all that much...
jens
On Monday, Aug 26, 2002, at 17:13 US/Eastern, Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
On 8/26/02 11:49 AM, Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
well, the basic cause is worse than that: they moved symbols
in your script you must commit a transaction once in a while with
get_transaction().commit().
when you use xml-rpc then every call to zope will end up being its own
transaction and you will not have this problem.
jens
On Sunday, Aug 25, 2002, at 10:12 US/Eastern, Christopher N. Deckard
this will probably not help with zope 2.4.3 since that has other
crash-bugs not covered by the python patch. upgrade to 2.4.4 or 2.5.1
instead.
jens
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, at 02:11 , Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Hi,
In past times I was advised to apply a patch and increase stack size for
have you read about the python crash-bug stemming from tiny thread
stack sizes on freebsd and applied the patch? the mailing list
archives should tell you what to do.
jens
On Tuesday, July 16, 2002, at 09:43 , Jeffrey P Shell wrote:
For a while now, Tracker has been core dumping on my with
There is a bug in IIS[1] which causes cookies to be dropped during a
redirect.
a bug in IIS??? no way...:P
Should my approach work? Are there better workarounds?
i don't know your situation exactly, but if IIS is not a pressing
requirement you can use apache for windows.
jens
casey duncan put a fix into CVS for what you might be experiencing. it will
probably show up with the first 2.6 betas.
jens
On Wednesday, June 5, 2002, at 11:11 , Emile van Sebille wrote:
I found this post from Ted Skolnick but saw no follow-ups, and I am
having the same problems. Ted,
I did. What is standard procedure if the situation like the one I've met
appears? What is scenarion from bug report to product release without the
bug found?
i don't know. the people on the python-dev mailing list could help you with
that question.
jens
add your comment, encouragement, flames et to the sourceforge bug tracker
issue. i guess that would help most.
jens
On Wednesday, May 15, 2002, at 10:55 , Myroslav Opyr wrote:
Hi,
it look like it works! I have to give site some time to run to be sure.
Where I can vote for a bug or to
Hosting
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cell: +380 50.3174578
On Wed, 15 May 2002, Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
python has a crashbug under FreeBSD due to FreeBSDs *tiny* thread stack
size.
search the mailing list, there were posts with workarounds.
unfortunately,
those workarounds involve
there is a common misconception that the number of threads and the
pool_size defined in ZODB/DB.py are the same. they are not.
number of threads is just that: the maximum number of threads the zope
process will spawn (excluding extra threads, such as those used for
zDaemon).
the pool_size in
the LDAPUserFolder-tailored solution is already available:
http://www.dataflake.org/software/ldaproletwiddler
jens
On Friday, May 3, 2002, at 05:00 , Stefan H. Holek wrote:
On Wed, 1 May 2002, Dirk Datzert wrote:
We decide to install only one LDAPUserFolder in the Root-Folder and
well, if all the user folders are configured the same way *except* for the
groups-to-role bit then you should get the functionality you need.
it's not trivial to program something that would allow retrieval of a user
object at the root and then somehow mangle the list of roles based on where
user.
jens
On Wednesday, May 1, 2002, at 08:59 , Dirk Datzert wrote:
Jens Vagelpohl schrieb:
well, if all the user folders are configured the same way *except* for
the
groups-to-role bit then you should get the functionality you need.
Yes, I expect that. but what if you have 100 user
log in with the superuser account (create one using the zpasswd utility if
needed), then you can delete the root user folder and create a new one.
user folders are one of the few things that can be owned by the superuser.
jens
On Tuesday, April 30, 2002, at 09:40 , Dirk Datzert wrote:
Hi,
Ive never looked at LDAPUserFolder so this may be irrelevant, but is
it possible for LDAPUserFolder to validate that the cached _v_
information is still fresh? If that validation is quicker than
fetching a new copy then this is still an overall win.
yes it does have a very rough way of
301 - 400 of 434 matches
Mail list logo