Hi,
On 26 March 2011 08:11, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
Hello,
* Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com [2011-03-25 13:58]:
plone.testing (which is Plone non-specific and will shortly be BSD
licensed) allows for stacking of ZCA registries.
[...]
Again, plone.testing
Hi,
On 26 March 2011 14:18, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
Because, while test layers are nice because they have the above
properties, I'm not too happy with the current implementation, namely
the use (or is it abuse? ;-) of __bases__ and __name__, which leads
very naturally to
Hi,
On 27 March 2011 15:54, Uli Fouquet u...@gnufix.de wrote:
The (limited) experiences with py.test, however, were awesome. Some
points that are quite cool IMHO:
- Easy finding of tests: just write some ``test_function`` in a
``test_module`` and it will be found and executed. That also
On 28 March 2011 15:45, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
The vast majority of the doctest testcases in zope.* packages fall into
this category: poor isolation, lots of edge cases which would obscure
any real narrative docs, of which there are almost none. I believe the
conflict is
Hi,
On 4 April 2011 17:30, Wolfgang Schnerring w...@gocept.com wrote:
So, how can we proceed here? Should I (and Thomas) try to get a
proof-of-concept implementation of this based on plone.testing? Or should
we think about what it takes to merge most of plone.testing's ZCA
support into
Hi,
I just found out that, since Zope 2.12 (or 2.13?) it's no longer
possible to install a ZEO server as a Windows service. Previously, it
used to be possible to do:
bin\zeoservice install
(where bin\zeoservice is installed by plone.recipe.zeoserver), but
apparently no longer.
Is this really
On 12 June 2011 21:48, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Currently if you ask a registry to singly-adapt an object to an
interface, and the object you're trying to adapt implements that
interface, here's what happens:
from zope.component.registry import Components
c = Components()
Hi,
You can use collective.beaker to manage your sessions with beaker, and
store on the filesystem (if all on the same server) or memcached (if
on different servers). That's a code change, though.
Martin
On 15 June 2011 17:50, Subish K S kssubish...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hi,
We have 10+ Zope
On 3 July 2011 16:44, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 7:09 AM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Zope still needs to the virtual host monster (or something like it) even
with the WSGI publisher; there's nothing equivalent in the WSGI world
(unless
Something of a meta-comment on this thread:
It sounds like people are broadly in agreement on the direction, but not
communicating enough about what's actually going on.
I think it would be useful to keep some kind of roadmap wiki on zope.org, or
at least post to the list periodically saying,
On 5 July 2011 09:42, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
What you are describing is exactly what I meant by old legacy Zope2
applications.
You should be able to use this style of development with Zope 2.13.
But you won't be able to upgrade to newer versions of Zope 2 anymore
and
On 5 July 2011 10:18, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
I would've thought it would also be possible for those who rely on this
to
maintain the relevant eggs as optional installations against Zope 2.x
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Mon, Jul 4, 2011 at 12:19 PM, yuppie y.2...@wcm-solutions.de wrote:
Long-term maintenance for Zope 2.13 would give these
projects/deployments at least a few more years.
Yes. I'm willing to cut releases for it for quite a
On 5 July 2011 11:10, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On 7/5/11 11:56 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 5 July 2011 10:31, Hanno Schlichtingha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
So we just got ourselves a Zope2 version 3.0. And no, naming it 4.0 or
5.0 or anything else doesn't make it any better
Hi,
On 5 July 2011 11:26, Tobias Helfrich helfr...@know-it.net wrote:
Hi Hanno
On Tue, Jul 5, 2011 at 10:19 AM, Tobias Helfrich
helfr...@know-it.net wrote:
OK, so you do think that we might use Zope 2.12 for a quite
long time
without thinking about anymore updates? Will there be
On 7 July 2011 12:58, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
Dear Zope Community,
on behalf of the Zope Foundation I please to announce
the relaunch of the new www.zope.org web site.
http://www.zope.org
The old zope.org site will available for the time being
in (reduced form) under
Hi,
On 17 August 2011 03:50, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
- - Land 'zope.registry' as a full ZTK package, with its own Launchpad
artifacts, etc. This step may also involve moving bugs from
zope.component to zope.registry.
This is not a major issue, but just be aware that
On 16 November 2011 11:30, Christian Theune c...@gocept.com wrote:
Going down into the new ZMI project I find it to be the most
light-weight approach without adding an extra dependency.
What is this project? ;-)
Martin
___
Zope-Dev maillist -
On 17 November 2011 11:28, li...@nidelven-it.no wrote:
Hi,
I have a bunch of External Methods I'd like to make available in a skin
form, and which reload in the same way a page template would if it was
modified and the server was in debug mode.
External methods should not require restarts
Hi,
On 17 November 2011 12:25, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
Along with David Glick, I would like to volunteer for the Zope 4
release management role, where I would take responsibility for
producing the initial release of Zope 4 and David would then take over
for the maintenance
On 17 November 2011 14:46, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
Here's my current understanding of the Zope 4 roadmap.
Zope 4
--
Significant progress has already been made on the following features
and I expect they should all land in time for a Zope 4 release:
- Storing parent
On 17 November 2011 15:50, Jim Fulton j...@zope.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 17, 2011 at 7:25 AM, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
... (Interesting roadmap snipped)
This process will necessitate a lot of merging, so I want to propose
that we move to Git for development (something we found
On 17 November 2011 16:32, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
* Zope 4 will not seek to innovate in itself but encourage innovation
in software components shared with the wider Python web community.
I smell something funny in here: if we aren't innovating, why are we
making the
Hi,
I found this code in PAS, which is mostly lifted from AccessControl.userfolder:
def _getObjectContext( self, v, request ):
request - ( a, c, n, v )
o 'a 'is the object the object was accessed through
o 'c 'is the physical container of the object
o 'n 'is
Hi,
AccessControl.ZopeSecurityPolicy contains this code:
from types import MethodType
# AccessControl.Implementation inserts:
# ZopeSecurityPolicy, getRoles, rolesForPermissionOn
from AccessControl.SimpleObjectPolicies import _noroles
rolesForPermissionOn = None # XXX: avoid import loop
Hi folks,
I have documented some of the darker corners of Zope's internals. I
put it in the Plone developer documentation for lack of a better
place, but it's not Plone-specific:
http://collective-docs.readthedocs.org/en/latest/zope_secrets/index.html
Topics covered include startup,
On 1 January 2012 09:44, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On Dec 31, 2011, at 20:09 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi folks,
I have documented some of the darker corners of Zope's internals. I
put it in the Plone developer documentation for lack of a better
place, but it's not Plone
On 1 January 2012 10:43, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Hi Martin,
There *is* a better place, docs.zope.org. If you can tell me where the
sources are I can put it there.
Sure: Clone https://github.com/collective/collective.developermanual/
and get it from source/zope_secrets.
On 1 January 2012 10:51, Andreas Jung li...@zopyx.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 1 January 2012 10:43, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Hi Martin,
There *is* a better place, docs.zope.org. If you can tell me
where the sources
On 1 January 2012 11:00, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
On Jan 1, 2012, at 11:46 , Martin Aspeli wrote:
Where is docs.zope.org maintained?
On one of the ZF servers.
If it's going to go there, I'd like it to (a) be in version control
and (b) be somewhere that I can edit
Hi,
There are three known WSGI implementations of the Zope 2 publisher.
I've had a look at them and made some notes about what I think
provides the best story:
## Zope 2.13 WSGIPublisher
Pros:
* Allows distributed transaction management with repoze.tm2
* Allows distributed retry with
On 2 January 2012 08:50, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 01/01/2012 08:39 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
There are three known WSGI implementations of the Zope 2 publisher.
I've had a look at them and made some notes about what I think
provides the best story:
## Zope 2.13
On 2 January 2012 12:33, Jens Vagelpohl j...@dataflake.org wrote:
Hi Martin,
Sphinx on svn.zope.org works for me. :)
I have created a simple buildout and put it in SVN:
http://svn.zope.org/zope_secrets/
The output is shown at http://docs.zope.org/zope_secrets/ and linked from the
front
On 3 January 2012 06:39, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-02 at 10:39 +, Martin Aspeli wrote:
On 2 January 2012 08:50, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
On 01/01/2012 08:39 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hi,
There are three known WSGI implementations
On 3 January 2012 08:01, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote:
Am I right in thinking Pyramid no longer uses repoze.tm2 or a
middleware approach? What was the rationale for that design decision?
You're right, Pyramid scaffolding no longer supplies repoze.tm2 or any
other WSGI middleware
On 9 April 2012 15:41, Brian Sutherland br...@vanguardistas.net wrote:
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 01:04:37PM -0700, Ross Patterson wrote:
experimental.broken is working well for me. It greatly aided me in
getting through a particularly nasty upgrade allowing me to cleanup the
ZCA cruft left
On 7 June 2012 07:20, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
Am 06.06.2012 um 19:58 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
[…]
As I said above, my main concern is keeping publisher events and
exception views intact. Some of these events need to happen in code
that's currently inside repoze.* middleware.
On 7 June 2012 07:20, Michael Howitz m...@gocept.com wrote:
Am 06.06.2012 um 19:58 schrieb Hanno Schlichting:
[…]
As I said above, my main concern is keeping publisher events and
exception views intact. Some of these events need to happen in code
that's currently inside repoze.* middleware.
On 20 August 2012 01:44, Ross Patterson m...@rpatterson.net wrote:
For me the discussion sounds a little like a general denial against
github using the legal story as rationale.
+10. I'm so glad others are saying the things I think need saying.
I *am* a signed ZF contributor and from
On 22 August 2012 18:30, Yusei TAHARA yu...@domen.cx wrote:
Hello,
I found a bug in ZopeSecurityPolicy and fixed it.
http://svn.zope.org/AccessControl/trunk/src/AccessControl/ZopeSecurityPolicy.py?rev=127548r1=113657r2=127548
Is it possible to release new version?
Are we sure this
401 - 440 of 440 matches
Mail list logo
