Re: [Zope-dev] zope and python compatibility

2003-01-09 Thread Adam Manock
I would strongly recommend using python version 2.1.3 for Zope 2.5.1 - 2.6.x and python = 2.2.2 for Zope 2.6.x. Adam On Thu, 2003-01-09 at 12:06, Tena Sakai wrote: Greetings zope-dev folks, Please help me out. I have seen below via google search: Zope 2.5 + Python 2.1 -- Good

[Zope-dev] dupe column names not supported (Shared.DC.ZRDB) ?

2002-12-17 Thread Adam Manock
Hi there, I'm currently testing (documenting, building RPM packages for) the following configuration: RedHat 8.0 python 2.1.3 postgresql 7.3 mx 2.0.3 psycopg 1.1 Zope-2.6.1b1 Having just got all the packages built and installed, I thought I'd run the database adapter, Zope and postgres through

Re: [Zope-dev] dupe column names not supported (Shared.DC.ZRDB) ?

2002-12-17 Thread Adam Manock
Just for curiousity, what is the use case for returning multiple columns with the same name? Sounds dubious to me. A self join will return multiple columns with the same name unless AS keyword is used. The use of AS keyword is supposed to be optional. Assuming that a user does use AS, labeling

[Zope-dev] python 2.1.3 on RedHat 8.0

2002-12-10 Thread Adam Manock
I am working on spec/RPM for Zope 2.6.x, but obviously a working python2.1.3 install is a pre-req if I want to support RH8.0 with the Zope RPMS :-) Attached are the changes made to the spec so that the python 2.1.3 SRPM from would --rebuild nicely on RedHat 8.0 Changes: Made tools

[Zope-dev] regression testing python install

2002-10-22 Thread Adam Manock
Slightly of topic I know, but I thought someone here might know... I'm tweaking the python2.1 SRPM from to get it to play nice with RedHat 8.0. Now that I have it compiling nicely, I thought it would be a good idea to fully regression test the resulting python install, especially as we

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope RPMs/debs and Linux FHS

2002-10-13 Thread Adam Manock
Looks good, I was planning to start from scratch with building a RPM for 2.6 that would work on at least RedHat 8.x AND 7.x.. Coincidentally, this is something I planned to start on tomorrow! :-) Instead, I'll take a few hours tomorrow to test your spec on RedHat 8.0, it would be *really*

Re: [Zope-dev] Slow zope on windows 2000?

2002-08-28 Thread Adam Manock
I'm not sure that is the case you know. Oracle 9i Linux is faster on my Linux Athlon 800 than the same release on my Win2k Dual Piii 1GHz. Also my Win box has 1Gb ram, while my Linux box has only 512Mb... In other news Apache is reported to run faster on Linux that Win2000, as is

Re: [Zope-dev] installer branch

2002-08-22 Thread Adam Manock
At 12:38 AM 8/22/02, Chris McDonough wrote: I have created (yet another, perhaps) easy Zope install branch off the current Zope trunk. It allows for a ./configure; make; make install sort of Zope installation for the source release. It also includes a version of the nascent that has

[Zope-dev] 2.6.0a1 CHANGES.txt doc-bug

2002-06-15 Thread Adam Manock
The change log: Contains no mention of Zope 2.5.1 beta 2. Bugfixes that were a part of beta2 are listed under the heading after Zope 2.5.1 Some important changes, eg: Fixed a bug in that would cause database adapters to hang on

[Zope-dev] ExternalEditor 0.3??

2002-06-14 Thread Adam Manock
Today, I was planning to see if I could create a single that works on both unix and W32.. Looking in CVS I saw that Casey has been busy, and that this is one of many things that have been done already. I also noticed that you were up kinda late last night Casey?!? :-) Anyway,

[Zope-dev] Zope 2.5.1 RPM built and ready for testing

2002-05-20 Thread Adam Manock
I have built a Zope 2.5.1 source RPM, it's ready for community tasting and testing ;-) Zope Corp, could you please host it, perhaps at ? I would like to only make it available in .src.rpm format initially, so that users testers can rpmbuild --rebuild

[Zope-dev] Final Python 2.1.x and Zope 2.5.x releases?

2002-04-02 Thread Adam Manock
Fellow bleeding edge Zopers, (Zopesters, Zopeheads, Zopers and Zopists too) Firstly, I'd like to thank everyone who has worked on the Segfault Saga, esp. Matthew and Leonardo! Obviously now that it's fixed, all that's left to do is to make stability a reality for everybody ;-) Does anyone

Re: [Zope-dev] OpenSSH configuration between ZEO clients storage server

2002-03-28 Thread Adam Manock
At 12:01 PM 3/27/02, Itamar Shtull-Trauring wrote: Shane Hathaway wrote: But you don't need reliability compensation to multiplex. SSH assumes the transport layer is reliable. So an SSH tunnel and an SSL tunnel are virtually synonymous. They're not really, but yeah, I was wrong :) A SSL

Re: [Zope-dev] OpenSSH configuration between ZEO clients storage server

2002-03-26 Thread Adam Manock
For a look at why TCP over TCP is a bad idea, (e.g. ssh port forwarding) see: For a solution, see: ;-) Adam ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL

Re: [Zope-dev] A thought for 2.6 about various leaks and memory problems

2002-03-19 Thread Adam Manock
Interesting. One complication with that scheme is that ther is no convenient place to put caching. If it goes between Pen and Zope, you need many instances of your cache. If it goes between Pen and the clients, Pen's client-clustering is defeated because it sees only one client. Postgresql

Re: [Zope-dev] Bug days

2002-03-15 Thread Adam Manock
Europe late afternoon = EST morning How would 1700 UTC (GMT) be for most people? People generally asleep between 12am and 6am. Therefore the best time is logically 2am or so central Pacific time (affecting very few) This is corresponds to 2pm GMT, 9am US EST, etc Adam

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.6 planning - call for contributors!

2002-03-15 Thread Adam Manock
FYI, everyone who's following this: I have hijacked for this purpose. :-) Awesome. Exactly how I'd like the default zope install to be structured. :-) Adam ___ Zope-Dev

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: bug in VirtualHostMonster in 2.5.0

2002-02-21 Thread Adam Manock
I can confirm that throwing this at a Zope 2.5.0 root VirtualHostMonster: http://localhost:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/ provides a page with this link: and on 2.4.4 you get:

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: bug in VirtualHostMonster in 2.5.0

2002-02-21 Thread Adam Manock
I tried out version 1.6 of: dated 2002/02/15 21:20:33 It works!! I got the correct: link on the page when I pointed my browser at:

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: bug in VirtualHostMonster in 2.5.0

2002-02-20 Thread Adam Manock
What info can you get from dtml-var REQUEST , say in a dtml doc called env_test ?? eg: ServerName newsite ProxyPass / http://192.168.X.Y:8080/VirtualHostBase/http/newsite:80/newsite/VirtualHostRoot/ ProxyPassReverse /

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope 2.4.4, when?

2002-01-21 Thread Adam Manock
At 09:10 AM 1/21/02, Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote: Guys, please, We really need 2.4.4 and our client won't accept a CVS version. 2.5 betas won't do it either. I think that's the case in many environments, mine included. I've been seriously considering rolling 2.3.3 back out just for the long

Re: [Zope-dev] Patch acceptance. What about this one?

2001-12-28 Thread Adam Manock
Just to be safe ... You shouldn't use this entire patch unless your server is behind apache or a proxy server and best if protected by a firewall. It could open a potential security leak if you use the domains field for authentication and the zope server is not protected by

[Zope-dev] Patch acceptance. What about this one?

2001-12-27 Thread Adam Manock
Fellow Zope addicts, I do both name and IP based virtual hosting from a single Apache instance, proxypassing to various different places within Zope. It works great, with or without Apache working mod_ssl magic! Except. There's a little issue with Zope logging to be solved. Zope logs the