Re: [Zope-dev] naming Zope

2009-04-12 Thread Chris Rossi
On Sat, Apr 11, 2009 at 9:05 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: On 4/11/09 7:32 PM, Roger Ineichen wrote: That much dependency cleanup would be fantastic. Yes, cool, but what exactly whould you like to cleanup? The bits that I use are already pretty nicely cleaned up. But in

Re: [Zope-dev] naming Zope

2009-04-09 Thread Chris Rossi
I can't believe no one's suggested Zope Mega, yet. Chris On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 4:25 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.comwrote: Hey, Joy, another naming discussion. Oh well, I started it. :) Zope Toolkit is better name than Zope Framework. I'm fine with renaming Zope Framework to

Re: [Zope-dev] Constant values defined in interfaces

2009-04-04 Thread Chris Rossi
On Fri, Apr 3, 2009 at 7:21 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote: Previously Chris Rossi wrote: I was wondering if the Zope collective had given any consideration to allowing constants to be defined in interfaces. To be clear, these are constant values that make up the protocol

Re: [Zope-dev] Constant values defined in interfaces

2009-04-04 Thread Chris Rossi
On Sat, Apr 4, 2009 at 6:04 PM, Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com wrote: Using an interface class for a constant container would often be handy but it might be an inappropriate use of interface classes. I would argue that it is appropriate, but that's probably related to my experience with

[Zope-dev] Constant values defined in interfaces

2009-04-03 Thread Chris Rossi
Hello, I was wondering if the Zope collective had given any consideration to allowing constants to be defined in interfaces. To be clear, these are constant values that make up the protocol defined by the interface. Just to have a concrete example, let's say we're modeling an http response: