--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:08:23 -0400 Fred L. Drake, Jr.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tres Seaver writes:
Actually, the restricted case is the one which has the real win; the
free-floating library is pretty, but not semanticaally needed. An
added argument: a ZPT with its own
--On Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:07:52 +1000 Adrian van den Dries
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd advise against installing Zope library files into site-packages
unless you put them in a site-packages subdirectory (like
site-packages/zope270 or site-packages/zope271). Otherwise there will
be no
--On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 03:43:33 PM -0500 Guido van Rossum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 15:22, Guido van Rossum wrote:
That's why we're including the correct versions of ZODB and ZEO in
Zope itself. That's already the case in Zope 2.6.
Zope 2.6 doesn't yet include ZEO,
--On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 02:39:55 PM -0500 Guido van Rossum
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does this mean that Zope 2.7 will require ZODB 3.2 for ZEO users?
Zope 2.7 will *come with* ZODB 3.2 (or later, depending on the timing
of the Zope 2.7 release), so I suppose so.
...
As an aside, am I the
We currently rely on two scripts for running our Zopes:
1. A modified version of zctl.py. I originally got it from a moribund wiki
on the Zope site.
The main changes we've made have been to better separate parameters for
Zope clients from
parameters for the ZEO server and to run an additional
PROTECTED] wrote:
Dan L. Pierson wrote at 2003-2-7 13:03 -0500:
...
If I open a ZSQL method (any ZSQL method, new or old, inside the
area that used to be controlled by LoginManager or not) it seems
OK. Using the method works. But if I click on the Advanced tab
in the ZMI, I get
--On Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:13:29 PM -0400 Shane Hathaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's really only a theoretical problem. To store the extra data about
folderish objects, you can save the data in a hidden file called, for
example, .properties. The theoretical problem is that
--On Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:48:12 AM -0400 Brian Lloyd
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We've already learned the hard way that the existing SiteRoots
and VirtualHostMonsters etc. confuse people. This is partly due
to under-documentation, but it is also partly because of the
here, we'll
--On Thursday, January 24, 2002 01:35:56 AM -0500 vio
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
exUserFolder installed ok, so I'll give it a test drive also.
But some hints on debugging LoginMgr would be also appreciated.
Personally, I'd stay away from LoginManager. It depends on ZPatterns,
a very
I agree that Brian's proposal is a good idea.
--On Friday, September 21, 2001 08:46:42 AM +0200 Robert Rottermann
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Brian,
that proposal sounds very good to me.
Could it be enhanced in a way that we can add an add automatic extension
when served by webdav.
What I
--On Thursday, June 07, 2001 09:34:54 AM -0400 Shane Hathaway
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I think I have a solution for all of the issues in conflict
resolution. If you, or anyone else, is also interested in this, please
show support (if only by saying please do this!) :-) I can't work
--On Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:50:43 AM -0700 jimbo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope this helps. I wanted to add my feelings on the whole documentation
issue. It seems to me that the whole process caters around developers
too much.
I have to disagree with you **in the context of this
--On Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:57:06 AM -0400 Paul Everitt
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmm, I'm surprised that 2 days has passed with no comment from zope-dev
and no comments in the Wiki. I hear constant complaints about lack of a
polished API. I expected this post to generate lots of
--On Saturday, March 17, 2001 08:46:26 PM -0500 Fred Wilson Horch
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think lossless serialization should be an explicit goal. If a
developer doesn't provide specific object serialization methods, then a
default method (perhaps XML) should be invoked that is
I've put up a writeup of a different way to use LoginManager with SQL
that I think is a bit more in keeping with the current ZPatterns at:
http://www.zope.org/Members/dlpierson/sqlLogin
Any comments? (I would have set this up as a formal HowTo, but
couldn't find a way to upload the contents.)
"Phillip J. Eby" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 01:37 PM 11/13/00 -0500, Dan L. Pierson wrote:
I've been trying to get Membership 0.7.6 working with
LoginManager-0-8-8b1 (and it's associated ZPatterns) under Zope 2.2.2
on RedHat 6.2. After probing around it seems that there is
Lalo Martins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Then I figured in the long run a Product isn't the best
sollution; instead, fiddling with App/Product* sounds more like
it, to allow developers to register tests just like they
register classes, ZClass superclasses, _misc and help. Of
course, just like
Andy Dawkins writes:
I have decided AGAINST searching the ZODB for instances of ZMailIn because
that is just too scary, hideously inefficient and I don't want to go there.
Instead I thought of keeping an up-to-date list of where all the current
instances where held. My original idea was
Bill Anderson writes:
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote:
At 04:03 PM 6/6/00 -0600, Bill Anderson wrote:
I am using the deafult UserSource that comes with LM for the moment (one
step at a time ;)
LM or PTK?
LM
(Waiting for Dan's changes before trying _any_ LM with PTK ;)
Chip Vanek writes:
Hi,
I also tried to get the patch working with 2.2CVS PTK CVS and had little luck.
I also needed to manually apply the patch and worked through the errors until
I got a security violation with the PTK. I was no longer in any way able to
access any of my test
Phillip J. Eby writes:
LoginManager will behave just like your outline, if you give it a
BasicCookie LoginMethod, and a BasicAuth LoginMethod, in that order.
LoginManager does not climb up the acquisition hierarchy, as that is
properly the province of ZPublisher to do. It will provide
OK, time for another Zen fix :-)
It looks like I've almost got PTK working with the latest
LoginManager. The remaining problem is that the login form doesn't
work. I've finally figured out why.
PTKBase.MemberFolder.MemberFolderBase.validate is much hairier than
22 matches
Mail list logo
