Re: [Zope-dev] PythonLibraries Product

2003-09-11 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Thursday, September 11, 2003 10:08:23 -0400 Fred L. Drake, Jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Tres Seaver writes: Actually, the restricted case is the one which has the real win; the free-floating library is pretty, but not semanticaally needed. An added argument: a ZPT with its own

Re: FHS, zopectl, #925, Re: [Zope-dev] 2.7 installation

2003-06-19 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Thursday, June 19, 2003 10:07:52 +1000 Adrian van den Dries [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd advise against installing Zope library files into site-packages unless you put them in a site-packages subdirectory (like site-packages/zope270 or site-packages/zope271). Otherwise there will be no

Re: [Zope] Re: [Zope-dev] Proposed installation changes for review

2003-03-11 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 03:43:33 PM -0500 Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2003-03-11 at 15:22, Guido van Rossum wrote: That's why we're including the correct versions of ZODB and ZEO in Zope itself. That's already the case in Zope 2.6. Zope 2.6 doesn't yet include ZEO,

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposed installation changes for review

2003-03-11 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 02:39:55 PM -0500 Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Does this mean that Zope 2.7 will require ZODB 3.2 for ZEO users? Zope 2.7 will *come with* ZODB 3.2 (or later, depending on the timing of the Zope 2.7 release), so I suppose so. ... As an aside, am I the

Re: [Zope-dev] Proposed installation changes for review

2003-03-11 Thread Dan L. Pierson
We currently rely on two scripts for running our Zopes: 1. A modified version of I originally got it from a moribund wiki on the Zope site. The main changes we've made have been to better separate parameters for Zope clients from parameters for the ZEO server and to run an additional

Re: [Zope-dev] [Vote] PEP308 voting began

2003-03-05 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Tuesday, March 04, 2003 03:23:54 PM -0500 Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: IMO TALES should solve this for itself by introducing an if/then/else expression form rather than depending on Python. If you can have a not:.. expression, surely you can have an if:..:then:..:else:..

Re: [Zope-dev] ZSQL/ZODB corruption after upgrade

2003-02-09 Thread Dan L. Pierson
PROTECTED] wrote: Dan L. Pierson wrote at 2003-2-7 13:03 -0500: ... If I open a ZSQL method (any ZSQL method, new or old, inside the area that used to be controlled by LoginManager or not) it seems OK. Using the method works. But if I click on the Advanced tab in the ZMI, I get

Re: [Zope-dev] Zope components and revision control with cvs

2002-08-02 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Thursday, August 01, 2002 10:13:29 PM -0400 Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's really only a theoretical problem. To store the extra data about folderish objects, you can save the data in a hidden file called, for example, .properties. The theoretical problem is that

RE: [Zope-dev] Speaking of 2.6...

2002-04-17 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Wednesday, April 17, 2002 11:48:12 AM -0400 Brian Lloyd [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: We've already learned the hard way that the existing SiteRoots and VirtualHostMonsters etc. confuse people. This is partly due to under-documentation, but it is also partly because of the here, we'll


2002-01-24 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Thursday, January 24, 2002 01:35:56 AM -0500 vio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: exUserFolder installed ok, so I'll give it a test drive also. But some hints on debugging LoginMgr would be also appreciated. Personally, I'd stay away from LoginManager. It depends on ZPatterns, a very

Re: Re: [Zope-dev] WebDav Bug? -- And some comments on how greatWebDAV is ;-)

2001-09-20 Thread Dan L. Pierson
I agree that Brian's proposal is a good idea. --On Friday, September 21, 2001 08:46:42 AM +0200 Robert Rottermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi Brian, that proposal sounds very good to me. Could it be enhanced in a way that we can add an add automatic extension when served by webdav. What I

Re: [Zope-dev] Bulletproof ZCatalog proposal

2001-06-07 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Thursday, June 07, 2001 09:34:54 AM -0400 Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: But I think I have a solution for all of the issues in conflict resolution. If you, or anyone else, is also interested in this, please show support (if only by saying please do this!) :-) I can't work

Re: [Zope-dev] [Announce] API Documentation Fishbowl Project

2001-06-07 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:50:43 AM -0700 jimbo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I hope this helps. I wanted to add my feelings on the whole documentation issue. It seems to me that the whole process caters around developers too much. I have to disagree with you **in the context of this

Re: [Zope-dev] [Announce] API Documentation Fishbowl Project

2001-06-06 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Wednesday, June 06, 2001 11:57:06 AM -0400 Paul Everitt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hmm, I'm surprised that 2 days has passed with no comment from zope-dev and no comments in the Wiki. I hear constant complaints about lack of a polished API. I expected this post to generate lots of

Re: [Zope-dev] FTP interface being worked on?

2001-03-18 Thread Dan L. Pierson
--On Saturday, March 17, 2001 08:46:26 PM -0500 Fred Wilson Horch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think lossless serialization should be an explicit goal. If a developer doesn't provide specific object serialization methods, then a default method (perhaps XML) should be invoked that is

[Zope-dev] Using LoginManager with SQL and SkinScript

2000-11-30 Thread Dan L. Pierson
I've put up a writeup of a different way to use LoginManager with SQL that I think is a bit more in keeping with the current ZPatterns at: Any comments? (I would have set this up as a formal HowTo, but couldn't find a way to upload the contents.)

Re: [Zope-dev] Membership and latest LoginManager

2000-11-13 Thread Dan L. Pierson
"Phillip J. Eby" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 01:37 PM 11/13/00 -0500, Dan L. Pierson wrote: I've been trying to get Membership 0.7.6 working with LoginManager-0-8-8b1 (and it's associated ZPatterns) under Zope 2.2.2 on RedHat 6.2. After probing around it seems that there is

Re: [Zope-dev] Unit testing, ZUnit

2000-10-24 Thread Dan L. Pierson
Lalo Martins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Then I figured in the long run a Product isn't the best sollution; instead, fiddling with App/Product* sounds more like it, to allow developers to register tests just like they register classes, ZClass superclasses, _misc and help. Of course, just like

[Zope-dev] Product Data Storage

2000-06-30 Thread Dan L. Pierson
Andy Dawkins writes: I have decided AGAINST searching the ZODB for instances of ZMailIn because that is just too scary, hideously inefficient and I don't want to go there. Instead I thought of keeping an up-to-date list of where all the current instances where held. My original idea was

Re: [Zope-dev] LM and user objects

2000-06-07 Thread Dan L. Pierson
Bill Anderson writes: "Phillip J. Eby" wrote: At 04:03 PM 6/6/00 -0600, Bill Anderson wrote: I am using the deafult UserSource that comes with LM for the moment (one step at a time ;) LM or PTK? LM (Waiting for Dan's changes before trying _any_ LM with PTK ;)

RE: [Zope-dev] LM and user objects

2000-06-07 Thread Dan L. Pierson
Chip Vanek writes: Hi, I also tried to get the patch working with 2.2CVS PTK CVS and had little luck. I also needed to manually apply the patch and worked through the errors until I got a security violation with the PTK. I was no longer in any way able to access any of my test

Re: [Zope-dev] Subclassing LoginManager

2000-05-22 Thread Dan L. Pierson
Phillip J. Eby writes: LoginManager will behave just like your outline, if you give it a BasicCookie LoginMethod, and a BasicAuth LoginMethod, in that order. LoginManager does not climb up the acquisition hierarchy, as that is properly the province of ZPublisher to do. It will provide

[Zope-dev] Subclassing LoginManager

2000-05-19 Thread Dan L. Pierson
OK, time for another Zen fix :-) It looks like I've almost got PTK working with the latest LoginManager. The remaining problem is that the login form doesn't work. I've finally figured out why. PTKBase.MemberFolder.MemberFolderBase.validate is much hairier than