Hi there,
On Tue, 05 Jun 2012 03:53:19 -0400 Tres Seaver wrote:
On 06/05/2012 03:28 AM, Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 04.06.2012 um 18:30 schrieb Uli Fouquet: […]
Also updated the 0.6 branch in SVN. Hope that's okay.
I think there should not be a 0.6 branch as the trunk is still on
0.6
Hi Leo,
On Sun, 3 Jun 2012 23:18:49 +0200 Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
+1 for merging
Great, thanks for looking into this! I'd be happy to merge and maybe
increase test-coverage.
Maybe someone could then do the zope.file 0.6.2 release or grant PyPI
permissions for 'ulif'.
Best regards,
Hi Michael,
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 16:02:52 +0200 Michael Howitz wrote:
Am 04.06.2012 um 14:11 schrieb Uli Fouquet:
[…]
Maybe someone could then do the zope.file 0.6.2 release or grant PyPI
permissions for 'ulif'.
Access granted.
Thanks a lot, 0.6.2 released.
Also updated the 0.6 branch
Hi Christopher,
On Tue, 29 May 2012 06:05:57 -0500 Christopher Lozinski wrote:
On 5/28/12 7:22 AM, Uli Fouquet wrote:
It's at least interesting to find other non-zope.app packages that
register zmi_views components. I think these could/should be fixed as
well. I would do that, if people tell
Hi there,
As Christopher Lozinski pointed out, there seem to be usecases where
people want to use single zope.app packages without zope.app.zcmlfiles
and the whole bunch of zope.app packages it pulls in.
Would it make sense for these packages to also register ZMI related
stuff only if some
On Sun, 27 May 2012 21:09:44 -0400 Tres Seaver wrote:
On 05/27/2012 07:36 PM, Ulrich Fouquet wrote:
Log message for revision 126504: Do menu-related configuration only if
z.a.zcmlfiles is available.
Changed: U zope.file/branches/ulif-fix-menus/CHANGES.txt U
Hi Christopher,
On Sun, 27 May 2012 20:28:49 -0500 Christopher Lozinski wrote:
Well this has been bothering me as well, so I am delighted to see this
thread.
I started off with the release of ZTFY that includes a ZMI.
I added in DTML.
What package did you add?
It could not find the
Hi there,
zope.file still registers browser menus for `zmi_views` in its
browser.zcml. This is a problem if you don't have/want the ZMI but want
to use zope.file otherwise (IMHO it also means an undeclared dependency,
as none of the packages zope.file declares to depend on really provides
this
Hi Leo,
On Sun, 27 May 2012 19:14:31 +0200 Leonardo Rochael Almeida wrote:
Hi Uli,
Not sure if you wanted to remove zope-dev from copy on purpose, but
what we talk about below is probably of general interest...
Sorry, that wasn't intentional.
On Sun, May 27, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Uli Fouquet
Hi Jeff,
On Wed, 16 May 2012 03:40:17 -0500 Jeff Rush wrote:
Are many folks using zope.pytest? We're looking into it but, for such a
small amount of code, are finding it a bit odd and seemingly broken.
No, I don't think many folks are using it right now. zope.pytest was a
quick shot to check
Hi there,
Benji York wrote:
On Sun, Mar 27, 2011 at 10:54 AM, Uli Fouquet u...@gnufix.de wrote:
- `assert` works like you would expect it to work in tests. No need
to use `self.assertEqual()`` and friends (but you can if you prefer).
How do they deal with the fact that assert statements
Hi there,
I first would like to thank everybody very much for the interesting and
elaborated answers to my last questions! I learned a lot about
registries and think that for now `plone.testing` (which in fact we
hadn't had on the screen) will help to solve some of the most urgent
issues we have
Hi there,
Some of you might have noticed that some time ago the first version of
`zope.pytest` was released:
http://pypi.python.org/pypi/zope.pytest
It's a try to make usage of `pytest` more comfortable in Zope-based
environments. `zope.pytest` is mainly based on Martijns, Jan-Wijbrands,
and
Hi Christophe,
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Thanks for releasing 0.8.1. It seemed to fix it!
However I have a weird problem: builders were all green, then I suddenly had
repeated failures with 0.8.1 on all the builders, then I've tried to launch
the
tests by myself directly in the
Hi Christophe,
Christophe Combelles wrote:
[snip: z3c.testsetup test errors on bluebream]
thanks!! There is only one remaining error on Python 2.4 now. It seems
related
to an 'encoding' argument added to DocFileSuite in python 2.5, and used in
zope.app.testing
Oh, missed that. This is
Hi there,
Christophe Combelles wrote:
Le 14/07/2010 11:28, Baiju M a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 14, 2010 at 2:57 PM, Baiju Mmba...@zeomega.com wrote:
On Sun, Jul 11, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Christophe Combellescc...@free.fr
wrote:
Le 11/07/2010 13:59, Zope Tests Summarizer a écrit :
Subject:
Hi there,
Tres Seaver wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
I don't know yet -- I planned to look at the failure more closely, and
figure out something that would work with the newer mechanize.
Just for your information, what we're doing is using wsgi_intercept,
which
Hi there,
In grokproject we would like to get rid of the zope.app.server
dependency. This is currently blocked by the zpasswd cmdline-tool
currently defined in z.a.server. We would like to provide this tool but
w/o z.a.server dependency.
Therefore I would like to move this script to
Hi there,
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
I've seen lots of checkins recently stating Comply with repository policy.
I haven't seen any announcement of a new official repository policy.
Have I missed it?
Tres explained that very well, I think. I also did some
comply-with-repos-policy checkins
Hi there,
As it turned out product configurations are not set with zope.app.wsgi
(contrary, for instance, to zope.app.server).
If in your zope.conf you define::
product-config prod1
key1 = val1
/product-config
these setting won't be accessible on startup using zope.app.wsgi and
Hi there,
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Alec Munro wrote:
I was just reading that, and am now hunting around on which files
exactly I have to modify to pin down the version to 3.8.1.
Add a [versions] section to your buildout.cfg:
[versions]
grokcore.view = 3.8.1
This will pull in a fixed
Hi there,
Uli Fouquet wrote:
Gary Poster wrote:
I'm concerned about the state of the zc.buildout template recipes. I
want one. I want some one-off files, specific to a certain project,
for which writing a standalone recipe feels very heavy.
Here are the template recipes I
Hi there,
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Uli Fouquet wrote:
I put the sources in a private repository meanwhile. I'd prefer to put
the sources into Zope repository again, but if this is legally too
difficult, they will stay hosted elsewhere.
Why not merge it back to the original recipe
:
collective.recipe.template (Wichert Akkerman)
iw.recipe.template (Ingeniweb)
inquant.recipe.textfile (Stefan Eletzhofer)
z3c.recipe.template (Uli Fouquet)
buildout_script (Nathan Yergler)
z3c.recipe.filetemplate (Philipp von Weitershausen)
First, on the basis of this list, it strikes me that a lot of people
Hi there,
Christian Theune wrote:
the cited response from Christian did not make it to the list as I
didn't reply to all in my first reply. Sorry!
On Sat, 2009-04-18 at 19:25 +0200, Uli Fouquet wrote:
We thought about this as well.
Some motivators for me, as I saw some of those
posting got lost on the way to my
mailreader. I noticed you replied when reading Theuni's posting.
Uli Fouquet wrote:
As Grok is now approaching the 1.0 release we (i.e. some Grok
developers and me) want to have a 'compliant' way to offer
paster-based serving of Grok instances
Hi there,
Christian Theune wrote:
On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 01:01 +0200, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hi.
Sorry Hanno, your posting got lost on the way to my mailreader. I
noticed you replied when reading Theuni's posting.
Uli Fouquet wrote:
As Grok is now approaching the 1.0 release we (i.e
Hi there,
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hermann Himmelbauer wrote:
Am Mittwoch 15 April 2009 09:24:23 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
[snip]
* I'd recommend some people get together and focus on building a much
smaller, more tightly focused replacement of the ZMI that does the
things people find
Hi there,
Andreas Jung wrote:
Having little success with megrok.c right now. I created a new Grok
sandbox using grokproject and added megrok.chamelon to the eggs option.
Running buildout fails:
aj...@suxmac2:~/sandboxes/chaeleon bin/buildout
Develop: '/Users/ajung/sandboxes/chaeleon/.'
Hi there,
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Uli Fouquet wrote:
[snip]
Any reviews by the more competent gurus in the list are highly
appreciated.
Your implementation and docs look fine to me.
Thanks for reviewing! It's all in trunk now.
The only comment I have
is I wonder why
Hi there,
Shane Hathaway wrote:
Uli Fouquet wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
http://svn.zope.org/Zope/trunk/lib/python/AccessControl/AuthEncoding.py?rev=94737view=markup
Is there some recent documentation about SSHA available? The netscape
links seems to be down.
I'm not sure where
Hi there,
thanks for all input so far :-)
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Shane Hathaway wrote:
[snip]
Also, every encrypted password should have a scheme name prefix in curly
braces, such as {SSHA}, as discussed earlier in this thread. That
makes it possible to support multiple schemes in a
Hi there,
Shane Hathaway wrote:
We should really be using the SSHA standard (as defined by LDAP) as a
minimum. SSHA was the default in Zope 2, but someone forgot to bring
this code over to Zope 3.
Hi there,
to answer myself ;-)
Uli Fouquet wrote:
Dan Korostelev wrote:
Yeah, that's definetely a mistake! The hash needs to be generated
using both salt and password.
[snip]
BTW, to fix it, we need to remember about migration of already stored
hashes. I guess zope.app.generations
Hi there,
while working on a password manager tool (commandline) for Grok I
stumbled over the usage of salts in the password managers of
`zope.app.authentication`.
In short, they seem to generate (and store) a salt number but do not
make any use of it when it comes to creating the hashes (SHA1,
Hi Dan,
thanks for your quick response.
Dan Korostelev wrote:
Yeah, that's definetely a mistake! The hash needs to be generated
using both salt and password.
Also, I saw a technique when you generate a hash using double hashing,
like this: sha(sha(password) + salt).hexdigest(). It looks
Hi there,
I cannot find packages on the ppix, that were released yesterday. For
example plone.recipe.plone-3.0.6 is missing or
gocept.recipe.deploymentsandbox (0.1.0). Normally, the lag is about a
few minutes. Does the update process hang again?
Kind regards,
--
Uli
signature.asc
Jim Fulton wrote:
The mirroring software got hung up on Wednesday. I got it going again.
Cool. Thanks a lot!
--
Uli
signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Hi there,
during grok development we recently experienced some trouble with the
zope.app.error package. We distribute the list on
`http://download.zope.org/distribution` as sources list for grokproject,
so that projects created with that tool, by default lookup this list for
available
Hi Philipp,
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Uli Fouquet wrote:
during grok development we recently experienced some trouble with the
zope.app.error package. We distribute the list on
`http://download.zope.org/distribution` as sources list for grokproject,
so that projects created
40 matches
Mail list logo
