Toby Dickenson wrote:
>
Sorry for the delay (book ... crushing ... head ... )
> Perhaps the hippo analogy isnt helping, so heres a more concrete example. In
> zope today it is possible for a user who has been granted the 'View
> Management Screens' permission in *one* folder to create a one-lin
> I'm not sure I grok what rightness has to do about it. I
> think this is
> right, to me wrong == broken. This is not broken.
Let me persuade you.
> > * someone adds an property named feed to an object at an
> intermediate
> > location in the containment heirarchy. This breaks the cron job
Toby Dickenson wrote:
>
> On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:54:19 +0100, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >>Consider the following passage in the documentation:
>
> Noo - Context-based instance-space applications are a major source
> of pain, bugs and security holes. They might be the on
On Fri, 20 Oct 2000 12:54:19 +0100, Chris Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>>Consider the following passage in the documentation:
Noo - Context-based instance-space applications are a major source
of pain, bugs and security holes. They might be the one thing that
Zope does different (and t
>From: Michel Pelletier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Jim Fulton wrote:
>>
>> Michel,
>>
>> You have advocated that methods should always be bound to the objects they
>> are accessed in. You argue that there should be no choice in the matter.
>
>I advocate more points than that, like being able to do
