> Hmmm. Hence the problem with properties that meant OFS.Item.SimpleItem
> had to have __allow_access_to_unprotected_subobjects__=1?
>
> Can you not just assign roles to properties as they're created or am I
> missing something else?
That's one way to do it - but it will require some thought
to
Brian Lloyd wrote:
>
> > In the new security model is it just attributes that are methods that
> > are protected or is it all attributes?
>
> All attributes - methods just happen to be the most common
> case.
Ah, okay, that makes life interesting :S
(although it does make more sense than just p
> In the new security model is it just attributes that are methods that
> are protected or is it all attributes?
All attributes - methods just happen to be the most common
case.
> Now, would I need body__roles__=None or somethign similar to
> be able to
> do:
>
Yes, or (better) associate th
