Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-02 Thread Chris Withers
Andrew Milton wrote: +---[ Chris Withers ]-- | Remember this: | Seriously, how do people feel about this? You can do anything you want with your time... who are we to judge? d8) Well, if there were no complaints I might do just that... Chris -- Simplistix -

Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-02 Thread Chris Withers
Andrew Milton wrote: | - mature | - stable | - maybe not the best choice for new development. ^ for you Indeed, but classic doesn't have any bad connotations as far as I'm concerned, and it'll need to keep living as long as Plone relies on it, which will be

Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-02 Thread Chris Withers
Andrew Milton wrote: | Why does it need to keep living even at old.zope.org? Why do you care if it does? Because someone needs to look after the (rather large, ancient and crufty) zope instance in which it lives, and it keeps on tripping up innocent passers-by. I don't think many of these

Re: [Zope-dev] [Zope] Zope 4.0, maybe not such a bad idea...

2009-04-02 Thread Chris Withers
Andrew Milton wrote: | Indeed, but classic doesn't have any bad connotations as far as I'm | concerned, and it'll need to keep living as long as Plone relies on it, | which will be forever... Plenty of people use it without plone. You might want to crawl out of the vacuum you live in.