Christian Theune wrote at 2009-4-3 08:45 +0200:
...
I don't want to change the process structure: I only want to assure that
the processes we start also quit.
Then no objection from me.
--
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 21:17 +0200, Dieter Maurer wrote:
Christian Theune wrote at 2009-4-2 13:30 +0200:
if tests spawn non-daemon threads, then the test runner can get stuck.
The easiest way that I see is to always --exit-with-status and to make
--exist-with-status also call sys.exit() when
On Thu, 2009-04-02 at 13:30 +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
Hi,
if tests spawn non-daemon threads, then the test runner can get stuck.
The easiest way that I see is to always --exit-with-status and to make
--exist-with-status also call sys.exit() when the tests passed.
Any objections?
I
Christian Theune wrote at 2009-4-2 13:30 +0200:
if tests spawn non-daemon threads, then the test runner can get stuck.
The easiest way that I see is to always --exit-with-status and to make
--exist-with-status also call sys.exit() when the tests passed.
I do not understand the implication.
Do
On Thu, Apr 02, 2009 at 01:30:38PM +0200, Christian Theune wrote:
if tests spawn non-daemon threads, then the test runner can get stuck.
The easiest way that I see is to always --exit-with-status and to make
--exist-with-status also call sys.exit() when the tests passed.
Any objections?
