Re: Re: [Zope-dev] xml-rpc changes between 2.7.0 and 2.7.3= ??

2004-10-12 Thread Alan Milligan
Heh,

Yes - would you like to lobby RedHat to change their up2date client??

I think the reason they've done this is because it's much more efficient.  Not only do 
they not have to read the body, they don't have to parse it.

Also, xml-rpc is totally screwed because it doesn't have a file type, and the normal 
binary limitation is 8192 bytes of parsable data between two tags :(

Alan

 Hi,

 Am Di, den 12.10.2004 schrieb Alan Milligan um 0:16:
  -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
  Hash: SHA1
 
  Hi,
 
  I had a client that used to work on 2.7.0, and now doesn't on 2.7.3.
 
  The problem would appear to be that it's not substituting the
  xmlrpc.Response class for a GET request on a text/xml content type and
  therefore just delegating to the str() function instead of wrapping it
  in the xml-rpc xml response tags.
 
  I'm a little confused about this, as this only appears to happen in
  HTTPRequest::processInputs which didn't seem to be invoked for my
  xml-rpc call anyway ...
 
  tcpdump follows for the sceptics ...
 
  j..
  08:05:04.901469 IP mistress.balclutha.org.34257 
  mistress.balclutha.org.zope: P 1:456(455) ack 1 win 32767
  nop,nop,timestamp 225097763 225097723
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]@.)..W.x...
  j..GET /last-bastion.net/junk/rpm/RPC2/$RHN/mail/listPackages/1 HTTP/1.1
  Host: localhost:8080
  Accept-Encoding: identity
  x-client-version: 1
  x-transport-info: Extended Capabilities Transport (C) Red Hat, Inc
  (version 1.40)
  x-up2date-version:
  user-agent: rhn.rpclib.py/$Revision: 1.40 $
  x-rhn-transport-capability: follow-redirects=1
  x-rhn-auth-channels: ['mail', '1']
  content-type: text/xml
  x-info: RPC Processor (C) Red Hat, Inc (version 1.44)

 Your log is a bit confusing maybe you better use tcpflow
 for dumping. But what is clearly seen is the GET request.
 I wonder how this ever was supposed to work since
 XML-RPC requires an entidy body for the message (which is
 in XML). You can compare with RFC2616 - there is no
 entidy body in GET. Your client needs to use POST.
 I suspect then it should work.

 Regards
 Tino





___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: Re: [Zope-dev] xml-rpc changes between 2.7.0 and 2.7.3= ??

2004-10-11 Thread Alan Milligan


 According to the CHANGES.txt there were no changes to XMLRPC.

xmlrpc.py is not faulty, it's just that an HTTPResponse object is assigned to the 
text/xml content type rather than the correct xmlrpc.Request :(



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: Re: [Zope-dev] xml-rpc changes between 2.7.0 and 2.7.3==20??

2004-10-11 Thread Andreas Jung
I suggest to look at the cvs log output for that particular file to find 
something.

-aj
--On Dienstag, 12. Oktober 2004 5:23 Uhr + Alan Milligan 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


According to the CHANGES.txt there were no changes to XMLRPC.
xmlrpc.py is not faulty, it's just that an HTTPResponse object is
assigned to the text/xml content type rather than the correct
xmlrpc.Request :(



___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )