Re: [Zope-dev] A thought for 2.6 about various leaks and memory problems

2002-03-19 Thread Anthony Baxter
Adrian Hungate wrote moved to a different thread or earlier, before the fork, so that we could simply kill senile threads without killing the entire shooting match? unfortunately apache does this with seperate processes, not threads. memory corruption and leaks aren't solved by offing

Re: [Zope-dev] A thought for 2.6 about various leaks and memory problems

2002-03-19 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 08:08:47 -, Adrian Hungate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: For the last few weeks (And maybe longer) I have been seeing lots of messages about zope leaking, the gc crashing and generally, Zope going senile after long runtimes or lots of requests. This was (And I believe still

Re: [Zope-dev] A thought for 2.6 about various leaks and memory problems

2002-03-19 Thread Chris McDonough
AutoLance is an implementation of the proposal, too: http://www.zope.org/Members/mcdonc/Products/AutoLance - Original Message - From: Toby Dickenson [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Adrian Hungate [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2002 8:31 AM Subject: Re: [Zope-dev]

Re: [Zope-dev] A thought for 2.6 about various leaks and memory problems

2002-03-19 Thread Shane Hathaway
Anthony Baxter wrote: Adrian Hungate wrote moved to a different thread or earlier, before the fork, so that we could simply kill senile threads without killing the entire shooting match? unfortunately apache does this with seperate processes, not threads. memory corruption and leaks

Re: [Zope-dev] A thought for 2.6 about various leaks and memory problems

2002-03-19 Thread Toby Dickenson
On Tue, 19 Mar 2002 11:02:27 -0500, Shane Hathaway [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: First, you'll need a load balancer. Here is a lightweight one that sounds like a good match for Zope, although I haven't tried it: http://siag.nu/pen/ It actually tries to match clients with servers, which should

Re: [Zope-dev] A thought for 2.6 about various leaks and memory problems

2002-03-19 Thread Adam Manock
Interesting. One complication with that scheme is that ther is no convenient place to put caching. If it goes between Pen and Zope, you need many instances of your cache. If it goes between Pen and the clients, Pen's client-clustering is defeated because it sees only one client. Postgresql

Re: [Zope-dev] A thought for 2.6 about various leaks and memory problems

2002-03-19 Thread Ross J. Reedstrom
On Tue, Mar 19, 2002 at 12:07:12PM -0500, Adam Manock wrote: Interesting. One complication with that scheme is that ther is no convenient place to put caching. If it goes between Pen and Zope, you need many instances of your cache. If it goes between Pen and the clients, Pen's

[Zope-dev] A thought for 2.6 about various leaks and memory problems

2002-03-18 Thread Adrian Hungate
For the last few weeks (And maybe longer) I have been seeing lots of messages about zope leaking, the gc crashing and generally, Zope going senile after long runtimes or lots of requests. This was (And I believe still is) a problem for Apache, which they solved by having threads only live for a