[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The 5th is confusing. What's the situation with *BSD like ports where
> the source code is patched right before compiling? What is the "date of
> change" in that case?
In that case the ZPL'd program isn't being redistributed modified, so
the 5th clause doesn't apply.
__
> It is important that add-on products for Zope be released under the
> ZPL.
What is the reason for not using the verbatim 3-clause BSD license?
The 4th clause in ZPL 2.1 is redundant, IANAL, though.
The 5th is confusing. What's the situation with *BSD like ports where
the source code is patched r
We have updated the Zope Public License (ZPL) to revision 2.1. ZPL 2.1
is reusable. It supports having a consistent license for Zope and
third-party products without requiring 3rd-party developers to assign
copyright to Zope Corporation.
It is important that add-on products for Zope be released und
