Re: [Zope-dev] BTree Folders
Chris Withers wrote: > > Right, BTree folders wise, what I'm looking for is to have, in effect > two Contents tabs for one BTree folder object, one showing all contained > items of a particular meta_type (with the BTree Folder's interface to > deal with lots of objects), and the other containing all other items in > the folder (DTML Methods, Gifs, etc, with a normal folder's interface). > > What's the best way to do this? If you're using ZPatterns anyway, you might like to look at PlugIns. The idea with PlugIns is that a PlugIn manager delegates the handling of objects it contains to its various PlugIns. Typically, a PlugIn will claim objects based on the object's meta-type. PlugIns appear in the user-interface as separate tabs. See the Customizers and Data Plug-ins tabs in a Folder w/ Customizer Support instance for an example. -- Steve Alexander Software Engineer Cat-Box limited http://www.cat-box.net ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] BTree Folders
Hi, There was talk a while back of re-doing BTree's in Zope so they were more efficient. Is that still going ahead? If I start using BTree folders now, will there be any nasties when the changes happen? Right, BTree folders wise, what I'm looking for is to have, in effect two Contents tabs for one BTree folder object, one showing all contained items of a particular meta_type (with the BTree Folder's interface to deal with lots of objects), and the other containing all other items in the folder (DTML Methods, Gifs, etc, with a normal folder's interface). What's the best way to do this? I was going going to subclass BTreeFolder, and overide the contents tab and provide an extra one, copying and hacking the DTML as appropriate to filter on meta_type. this strikes me as not very robust as I won't benefit from any improvements to either GUI that are made in the future. Is there perhaps a better way? Also, what's the difference between a 'Full' and a 'Basic' BTreeFolder, which one should I use? cheers, Chris ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
Re: [Zope-dev] BTree folders: opinions?
Steve Alexander wrote: > > I've been reading the discussions on benchmarks of BTreeFolder verus > standard ObjectManager dict based folders. > > I have a BTreeFolder w/ Customizer support that I'd like to include in > the DataSkinAddons package for its next release. I'll probably release a > LargeUI Folder w/ Customizer Support, that has the BTreeFolder UI > anyway. > > However, I'm not sure whether to store the folder contents in a dict or > a BTree. > > Are dictionaries or BTrees the way to go for folders with lots of > sub-objects? > Anyone tried any other benchmarks? > > I *suppose* it could even be configurable: > > How about this for an idea: > > * Management interface uses the standard Folder interface when the > number of objects in the contents are less than a certain amount. > With more objects, it switches to the BTree Folder UI. > This number can be reconfigured as an attribute of the folder. Have you considered a batching UI? The consensus here at DC when we had the meeting about big folders was that folders with lots of objects ought to batch. However, once I saw how fast a simple list is, I lost interest in batching. > * You can switch between using a dict and a BTree to store the > sub-objects, on an instance-by-instance basis. The switch-over > will be slow, but it will be easier than changing the base-class > of existing instances. You'll probably get the biggest win just by replacing the custom __getattr__ method with a C version. I understand that switching from C to Python and back to C again is expensive, but a C version would turn the path into C->C->C. It might level the benchmarks. Shane ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
[Zope-dev] BTree folders: opinions?
I've been reading the discussions on benchmarks of BTreeFolder verus standard ObjectManager dict based folders. I have a BTreeFolder w/ Customizer support that I'd like to include in the DataSkinAddons package for its next release. I'll probably release a LargeUI Folder w/ Customizer Support, that has the BTreeFolder UI anyway. However, I'm not sure whether to store the folder contents in a dict or a BTree. Are dictionaries or BTrees the way to go for folders with lots of sub-objects? Anyone tried any other benchmarks? I *suppose* it could even be configurable: How about this for an idea: * Management interface uses the standard Folder interface when the number of objects in the contents are less than a certain amount. With more objects, it switches to the BTree Folder UI. This number can be reconfigured as an attribute of the folder. * You can switch between using a dict and a BTree to store the sub-objects, on an instance-by-instance basis. The switch-over will be slow, but it will be easier than changing the base-class of existing instances. Comments? -- Steve Alexander Software Engineer Cat-Box limited http://www.cat-box.net ___ Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )