Re: [Zope-dev] Copyright update for z3c.ajax: no buildout, no headers

2010-06-04 Thread Jan-Wijbrand Kolman
On 6/3/10 8:20 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
 Hi,

 I just fixed up z3c.ajax and it has a quirk that the check doesn't know
 about:

 If a file doesn't contain any copyright attribution header, it ignores
 that file.

 In this case, z3c.ajax has no headers at all. no setup.py. no buildout.

 I added the missing license and copyright files to silence the check but
 I'm relatively sure there's an edge case here.

 Thoughts?

Any ideas yet on situations like these?

I found several packages now that do not contain any copyright headers 
in the python modules, or, sometimes they do in the package itself, but 
not in the package's test modules.

I decided to just go ahead for now silencing the check, my reasoning 
being: if the copyright-checkscript is updated at some point in time to 
also check for copyright-less modules, we automatically will have list 
again of project that need fixing in that regard.

OK?

regards, jw

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Copyright update for z3c.ajax: no buildout, no headers

2010-06-04 Thread Christian Theune
On 06/04/2010 12:49 PM, Jan-Wijbrand Kolman wrote:
 On 6/3/10 8:20 AM, Christian Theune wrote:
 Hi,

 I just fixed up z3c.ajax and it has a quirk that the check doesn't know
 about:

 If a file doesn't contain any copyright attribution header, it ignores
 that file.

 In this case, z3c.ajax has no headers at all. no setup.py. no buildout.

 I added the missing license and copyright files to silence the check but
 I'm relatively sure there's an edge case here.

 Thoughts?

 Any ideas yet on situations like these?

 I found several packages now that do not contain any copyright headers
 in the python modules, or, sometimes they do in the package itself, but
 not in the package's test modules.

 I decided to just go ahead for now silencing the check, my reasoning
 being: if the copyright-checkscript is updated at some point in time to
 also check for copyright-less modules, we automatically will have list
 again of project that need fixing in that regard.

 OK?

That's what I think and did this morning, too.


-- 
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh  co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Copyright update for z3c.ajax: no buildout, no headers

2010-06-03 Thread Christian Theune
Hi,

I just fixed up z3c.ajax and it has a quirk that the check doesn't know 
about:

If a file doesn't contain any copyright attribution header, it ignores 
that file.

In this case, z3c.ajax has no headers at all. no setup.py. no buildout.

I added the missing license and copyright files to silence the check but 
I'm relatively sure there's an edge case here.

Thoughts?

Christian

-- 
Christian Theune · c...@gocept.com
gocept gmbh  co. kg · forsterstraße 29 · 06112 halle (saale) · germany
http://gocept.com · tel +49 345 1229889 0 · fax +49 345 1229889 1
Zope and Plone consulting and development

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 https://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )