Steve Alexander wrote:
>
> No, no, no!
>
> Ignore the patch, it is a placebo :-/
> I should read these things back more carefully...
>
> The bit about reimplementing time.strftime() in DateTime.py still holds
> though.
In brief, though -- and hopefuly clearer this time:
If you format DateTime
Steve Alexander wrote:
>
> This is particularly apparent in the current DateTime.py, because its
> strftime method just interprets the internal representation of the time
> as GMT, whatever.
>
> We can fix this easily:
>
> *** lib/python/DateTime/DateTime.py Sun Jul 23 20:03:05 2000
> --- l
