Re: [Zope-dev] Designing ZPatterns/Python-product-based, reusable applications - take 2

2001-03-17 Thread Steve Alexander
Itai Tavor wrote: This brings up another thing that bothers me: When I started learning object models and ZPatterns everyone advocated using Coad notation. Now Peter Coad himself is using UML and you're building TransWarp around UML. Is this a conspiracy to confuse me? ZPatterns is very

Re: [Zope-dev] Designing ZPatterns/Python-product-based, reusable applications - take 2

2001-03-11 Thread Itai Tavor
Phillip J. Eby wrote: At 10:24 AM 3/11/01 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote: Then I need Specialists to manage collections of PD classes. I think that these would also benefit from being product-based, so I subclass Specialist to create a manager for each role in the application. Now, since an existing

[Zope-dev] Designing ZPatterns/Python-product-based, reusable applications -take 2

2001-03-10 Thread Itai Tavor
Hi, I didn't get very far asking this question a little while ago, so I'm going to try again. I started developing ZPatterns applications in the ZODB. Then I figured there would be advantages to moving instead to python product-based development. My goal is to create applications that can

Re: [Zope-dev] Designing ZPatterns/Python-product-based, reusable applications - take 2

2001-03-10 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 10:24 AM 3/11/01 +1100, Itai Tavor wrote: Then I need Specialists to manage collections of PD classes. I think that these would also benefit from being product-based, so I subclass Specialist to create a manager for each role in the application. Now, since an existing application might be