Re: [Zope-dev] Expanded access file (was Re: LoginManagerpatch consideredharmful)harmful)

2000-07-19 Thread Chris Withers
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote: You speak in the past tense. This is only a suggestion and a possibility. It's not as important as some other feature requests. Patch opportunity, perhaps? :) Ty and I would do it, no problem. Heck, I've been tempted to do it as a LoginManager function, since

Re: [Zope-dev] Expanded access file (was Re: LoginManagerpatch consideredharmful)harmful)

2000-07-19 Thread Shane Hathaway
"Phillip J. Eby" wrote: At 10:15 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote: Chris Withers wrote: "Phillip J. Eby" wrote: Maybe, maybe not. I think perhaps the most compelling argument from Digital Creations' viewpoint for having an expanded "access" file might be the

Re: [Zope-dev] Expanded access file (was Re: LoginManagerpatch consideredharmful)harmful)

2000-07-19 Thread Phillip J. Eby
At 11:09 AM 7/19/00 -0400, Shane Hathaway wrote: Patch opportunity, perhaps? :) Ty and I would do it, no problem. Heck, I've been tempted to do it as a LoginManager function, since Zope doesn't pay attention to anything past the first line of the "access" file... We would be most