On Monday 02 Sep 2002 4:30 am, Casey Duncan wrote:
What do you all think of this? Do redirects ever make sense to an xml-rpc
call?
In reading the spec it says (in reference to the response status value):
Unless there's a lower-level error, always return 200 OK.
Now granted this problem
On Tuesday 03 September 2002 03:53 am, Toby Dickenson wrote:
On Monday 02 Sep 2002 4:30 am, Casey Duncan wrote:
What do you all think of this? Do redirects ever make sense to an xml-rpc
call?
In reading the spec it says (in reference to the response status value):
Unless there's a
On Tuesday 03 Sep 2002 3:23 pm, Casey Duncan wrote:
For a long long time I have been using a patched xmlrpc module which
returns the redirect target as an xmlrpc string in this case.
This is interesting. Do you ever do anything with the redirect value?
Occasionally yes.
I have some
Casey Duncan writes:
What do you all think of this? Do redirects ever make sense to an xml-rpc
call?
I do not think so.
If necessary, the call can be wrapped to avoid a redirect.
Dieter
___
Zope-Dev maillist - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What do you all think of this? Do redirects ever make sense to an xml-rpc
call?
In reading the spec it says (in reference to the response status value):
Unless there's a lower-level error, always return 200 OK.
Now granted this problem stems from calling a ZMI API through xml-rpc, but
for
