Re: [Zope-dev] Potential Improvements for xml-rpc debugging

2002-08-30 Thread Andy McKay

> Now my question is whether this is a good thing in general

+1 and not just for xmlrpc, the less HTML that gets sent in errors the
better.
--
  Andy McKay
  Agmweb Consulting
  http://www.agmweb.ca




___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )



Re: [Zope-dev] Potential Improvements for xml-rpc debugging

2002-08-30 Thread Brad Clements

On 30 Aug 2002 at 10:10, Casey Duncan wrote:

> Now my question is whether this is a good thing in general. I like it
> especially when accessing Zope using Python's xmlrpclib, but do any of have
> reasons for keeping the html tags in the fault string?

No, drop the HTML!

I do a lot of xml-rpc with IE 5.5 clients, and getting a fault is a pita.

I keep modifying xmlrpc.py (each time I update Zope) to print the traceback on the 
server, but that's a pita.

Brad Clements,[EMAIL PROTECTED]   (315)268-1000
http://www.murkworks.com  (315)268-9812 Fax
AOL-IM: BKClements


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )



[Zope-dev] Potential Improvements for xml-rpc debugging

2002-08-30 Thread Casey Duncan

I am working on improved xml-rpc fault output because I find the current 
output from Zope less than useful.

Basically what my version does is strip the html tags from the error value 
returned from Zope/standard_error_message, formats it in a simple way 
(basically justs trims line breaks down) and then generates a formatted 
traceback (if you are in debug mode) as the xml-rpc fault string. If you 
aren't in debug mode then it just outputs the error type and the formatted 
value as the fault string.

Now my question is whether this is a good thing in general. I like it 
especially when accessing Zope using Python's xmlrpclib, but do any of have 
reasons for keeping the html tags in the fault string?

Thought I would ask before I check this in.

-Casey

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://lists.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )