Andreas Jung wrote at 2004-5-20 10:02 +0200:
>I have not followed the discussion but is this leak as serious as it should
>be resolved
>before the next 2.7.1 beta1 release?
I doubt that it is a Zope bug...
I am unable to reproduce any leak in connection with error handling.
Otherwise, we can onl
I have not followed the discussion but is this leak as serious as it should
be resolved
before the next 2.7.1 beta1 release?
Andreas
--On Donnerstag, 20. Mai 2004 9:52 Uhr +0200 Dieter Maurer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 2004-5-19 14:44 -0400:
...
Right now I've focused
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 2004-5-19 14:44 -0400:
> ...
>Right now I've focused on finding out why the Requests are still around.
>
>Using the gc module, I've found that all leaked requests are being held by a
>dictionary. If I look at said dictionaries, this is what they might look
>like:
>
>{'RE
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote at 2004-5-19 14:44 -0400:
> ...
>In following to the discussions regarding the leakage zope.org and my site
>suffer from, I've done some testing, and here's what I've found.
>
>First of all, the leak does seem to occur when errors occur. Unlike what
>Chris suggested, I stil
Gents,
In following to the discussions regarding the leakage zope.org and my site
suffer from, I've done some testing, and here's what I've found.
First of all, the leak does seem to occur when errors occur. Unlike what
Chris suggested, I still suffer from this leak even when I completely
remove
