Guido van Rossum wrote:
Is security really a part of an object's interface? I thought this was more
of an implementation thing.
Good point. Certainly in Unix I can have two things implementing the
same interface (e.g. two named pipes) with different security
settings (i.e. modes).
I notice you mention post/pre conditions (something that UML obviously talks
about). I wonder if we want to do a bit of research on Eiffle and it's
contractual description. The only thing I wonder is if some of this is
actually useful programatically, if that makes sense? It's great info,
[Christopher Petrilli]
I notice you mention post/pre conditions (something that UML
obviously talks about). I wonder if we want to do a bit of
research on Eiffle and it's contractual description. The only
thing I wonder is if some of this is actually useful
programatically, if that makes
Guido van Rossum [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
When you've fully debugged an application, you turn both off.
When you've fully debugged a library module, you create two versions:
one with both turned off, for use in fully debugged applications, and
one with pre-conditions on and post-conditions off,
