On 4 Jun 2005, at 08:07, Balazs Ree wrote:
Now I would like to pose a question to all of you. I am of course not
worried if Mount.py is getting phased out completely, since I would be
able to take over the code from it into my subclass. But according
to my
use case described above, am I on the
Thu, 02 Jun 2005 19:38:02 -0400 Tim Peters wrote:
> We'd like to continue getting non-ZODB code out of the ZODB project, so
> would like to drop Mount.py from ZODB 3.5. Are any of zodb-dev's
> "standalone" ZODB users making use of Mount.py? I would be surprised by
> that too, since Mount.py reli