[Zope-dev] Re: [ZPT] Re: RFC: TALES adapters and TAL/Tales variable namespaces

2004-05-21 Thread Ian Bicking
Jim Fulton wrote: One disadvantage I see with the cast notation is that it's a bit jarring in: a/b/(adapter)c/d as the adapter is applied to a/b/c. The order just doesn't seem quite right. That is indeed jarring, especially since c isn't an object, it's just a name, and a/b/c is the object in

[Zope-dev] Re: [ZPT] Re: RFC: TALES adapters and TAL/Tales variable namespaces

2004-05-21 Thread Evan Simpson
Jim Fulton wrote: One disadvantage I see with the cast notation is that it's a bit jarring in: a/b/(adapter)c/d as the adapter is applied to a/b/c. The order just doesn't seem quite right. Unless I'm misunderstanding something fundamental here, in the TALES context an adapter is essentially a