Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
yuppie wrote at 2007-2-3 11:44 +0100:
...
Unfortunately integrating a product into the Zope core means more
than just adjusting the coding style:
- As already mentioned in this thread, monkey patches and code like
fixPluginIndexes.py
Previously Dieter Maurer wrote:
You fetch it from my Zope page and put it into a subversion
repository (perferably on a vendor branch) of your choice.
Hanno imported it at http://svn.plone.org/svn/collective/AdvancedQuery
two days ago. We'll try to keep that synchronised with your work.
On 5 Feb 2007, at 12:22 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Some of the holdup is in the bylaws. The bylaws were, simply put,
rather overengineered, and we've been struggling to cut them down so
we can actually work with them. This is holding up the IP transfer.
Ok. Is there anything us mere mortals can
On Mon, February 5, 2007 12:26, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007, at 12:22 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Some of the holdup is in the bylaws. The bylaws were, simply put,
rather overengineered, and we've been struggling to cut them down so
we can actually work with them. This is
On Mon, 2007-05-02 at 12:26 +0100, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007, at 12:22 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Another is of course who is doing the hosting. Currently we're using
ZC's infrastructure for SVN. We need to shift it away from ZC's
infrastructure at some point to make it
Previously Rocky Burt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-02 at 12:26 +0100, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
On 5 Feb 2007, at 12:22 , Martijn Faassen wrote:
Another is of course who is doing the hosting. Currently we're using
ZC's infrastructure for SVN. We need to shift it away from ZC's
Previously Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Note that we have the same issue with ZopeVersionControl, which is
currently only in CVS. An import of that into subversion would make a
lot of us very happy.
I asked Jim about this and he told me to just import the current CVS
code into svn and go from
Previously Tres Seaver wrote:
I looked at my CVS checkout, and noticed that a file ('tests/common.py')
had not been checked in for ZVC 0.3.3. I therefore checked it in,
tagged 0.3.4, and re-imported the SVN version from that tag. Finally, I
added an 'ATTENTION_THIS_AREA_IS_NOW_CLOSED.txt'
Previously Martin Aspeli wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Whit (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) reported that AdvancedQuery
is going to ship with Plone3 and that packaging would be easier for them
if
AdvancedQuery were part of the Zope 2 distribution.
I fail to find
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Feb 2007, at 12:47, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I'm not quite sure it has to be part of Zope 2 as you install it.
Having
it in svn.zope.org would go a long, way, though, allowing us to use
svn:externals during development and potentially fix
yuppie wrote at 2007-2-3 11:44 +0100:
...
Unfortunately integrating a product into the Zope core means more than
just adjusting the coding style:
- As already mentioned in this thread, monkey patches and code like
fixPluginIndexes.py have to be resolved. AdvancedQuery contains a monkey
patch
Jens Vagelpohl wrote:
On 4 Feb 2007, at 12:47, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
I'm not quite sure it has to be part of Zope 2 as you install it. Having
it in svn.zope.org would go a long, way, though, allowing us to use
svn:externals during development and potentially fix issues ourselves as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Feb 2007, at 18:27, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Note that we have the same issue with ZopeVersionControl, which is
currently only in CVS. An import of that into subversion would
make a
lot of us very happy.
I think it has been
--On 4. Februar 2007 18:39:22 +0100 Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Feb 2007, at 18:27, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Note that we have the same issue with ZopeVersionControl, which is
currently only in CVS. An import of that
--On 4. Februar 2007 18:44:38 +0100 Andreas Jung [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--On 4. Februar 2007 18:39:22 +0100 Jens Vagelpohl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 4 Feb 2007, at 18:27, Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Note that we have the same issue
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2007-2-4 18:35 +0100:
Monkey patches should be avoided when they can. I think that's something
we don't need to discuss.
You think this way but I disagree...
There are (potentially) dangerous monkey patches and harmless ones.
We discuss about a
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote at 2007-2-4 18:35 +0100:
...
I
think we can leave everything as it is and if Plone needs it in an svn
repo, heck, why not do vendor imports? (not in svn.zope.org, of course,
since the contributor agreement forbids that)
One of the rare cases when I agree with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andreas Jung wrote:
--On 4. Februar 2007 18:12:52 +0100 Dieter Maurer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Andreas Jung wrote at 2007-2-3 08:47 +0100:
...
* my code uses 2 blank indentation rather than the usual 4 blank
(to make it more readable
--On 4. Februar 2007 19:24:09 -0500 Tres Seaver [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Anyone else should think about how to deal with this issue...I'm too
much biased :-)
- -1 on reformatting code, especially if we are talking about putting it
in
Hi Dieter!
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Whit (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) reported that AdvancedQuery
is going to ship with Plone3 and that packaging would be easier for them if
AdvancedQuery were part of the Zope 2 distribution.
According to Whit, Alexander Limi seems to be interested to have
Managable
yuppie wrote:
- Should we add new products to the core? I thought we want to move away
from products and use python packages instead. The AdvancedQuery code
might become part of the ZCatalog package, ManagableIndex might be
converted to a non-products package.
There are hardly new, though,
First let me say, that I'm in favour to add these products to Zope in
some form, to take the chance to enhance the zcatalog significantly.
Am 03.02.2007 um 14:34 schrieb Martin Aspeli:
yuppie wrote:
- Should we add new products to the core? I thought we want to
move away from products and
Replying to my own post,
Am 03.02.2007 um 15:14 schrieb Janko Hauser:
There are hardly new, though, they've been around for ages and
have enthusiastic users. Those users always found it hard to
convince people to adopt them more widely because they were not in
the standard repositories
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Whit (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) reported that AdvancedQuery
is going to ship with Plone3 and that packaging would be easier for them if
AdvancedQuery were part of the Zope 2 distribution.
I fail to find an explanation *why* that is.
According to Whit, Alexander Limi
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Whit (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) reported that AdvancedQuery
is going to ship with Plone3 and that packaging would be easier for them if
AdvancedQuery were part of the Zope 2 distribution.
I fail to find an explanation *why* that is.
I'm
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Philipp von Weitershausen wrote:
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Whit (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) reported that AdvancedQuery
is going to ship with Plone3 and that packaging would be easier for
them if
AdvancedQuery were part of the Zope 2 distribution.
I fail to find an
Dieter Maurer wrote:
I have no problems to donate AdvancedQuery and/or Managable Index
to the Zope Foundation
That's great, thank you! :)
*BUT* I will not modify the code to bring
it in line with the different style requirements usually applied
to Zope components: e.g.
* my code uses 2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dieter Maurer wrote:
Whit (mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]) reported that AdvancedQuery
is going to ship with Plone3 and that packaging would be easier for them if
AdvancedQuery were part of the Zope 2 distribution.
According to Whit, Alexander Limi
28 matches
Mail list logo
