Jim Fulton wrote: > Binaries, except for Windows, should never never be uploaded to PyPI (or > download.zope.org). There are just too many variables to building > binaries.
Yes, that's what I meant to ask for, PILwoTk-1.1.6.3 to PyPI as a source release. I'm currently using http://download.zope.org/distribution/PILwoTk-1.1.6.3.tar.gz > A more interesting questions is whether the source release should be > uploaded. I wish someone could convince Fredrik Lundh to make a saner > release of PIL. Maybe someone could pursue this on the image- sig > mailing list (http://mail.python.org/pipermail/image-sig/). Yes, that's what I was hoping to avoid asking ;) since I don't know the PIL packaging rationale. The effbot.org release pages are so thorough, I presumed that PIL was going to continue to be packaged as-is. Thanks. _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )
