Re: [Zope-dev] Re: ZPT backward compatibility

2006-01-17 Thread Dieter Maurer
Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-1-16 19:55 +0100: ... Well, I brought this issue up on zope-dev to discuss this issue directly. but with almost zero feedback :-) Also another related posting to zope-zpt got _zero_ anwers. I have seen some answers -- though not too many... Note also that

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: ZPT backward compatibility

2006-01-17 Thread Tino Wildenhain
Dieter Maurer schrieb: Andreas Jung wrote at 2006-1-16 19:55 +0100: ... I have seen some answers -- though not too many... Note also that zpt@zope.org is a very low activity list. For it, a few answers is already a lot... Add to it the fact the zpt@zope.org was due to be retired anyway ;)

Re: [Zope-dev] Re: ZPT backward compatibility

2006-01-17 Thread Fred Drake
On 1/17/06, Tino Wildenhain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Add to it the fact the zpt@zope.org was due to be retired anyway ;) Though retirement for the list was discussed, it was decided not to retire it since it was still the best place for implementors to discuss matters. The implementations in

[Zope-dev] Re: ZPT backward compatibility

2006-01-16 Thread Andreas Jung
--On 16. Januar 2006 13:36:32 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: There are two separate issues here: 1. ZPT backward compatibility. Are we introdcuting ZPT backward incompatibilities? (Aside from module paths)? My original implementation would introduce incompatibilities