Matthew Grant wrote:
FYI - Test coverage in zope.sendmail was originally pretty thin.
Hmmm, apply some svn blame, find the culprite and lets arrange some
burning at the stake...
Seriously, am I right in remembering "Zope 3" and all things related to
have been "test first" from day 1?
Zope3
Chris,
FYI - Test coverage in zope.sendmail was originally pretty thin. The
work I have done is a big improvement. Zope.sendmail is a corner of
Zope3 which has not been implemented that well, and this show up in the
terms of its quality and sparse unit test coverage.
Patience please!
Cheers,
Matthew Grant wrote:
Just done edits you suggested. Some Unit tests still to be written.
If you wrote the tests first *AS YOU SHOULD* this wouldn't be a problem.
Tests written after the case have a tendency to omit edge cases...
Won't be doing one for that /1000 as tehre are more important t
Hi!
Just done edits you suggested. Some Unit tests still to be written.
Won't be doing one for that /1000 as tehre are more important things to
check like exception functionality.
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 23:32 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> There are two checkins on the branch.
>
> =
>
Working on this.
tehre are some things I will get back to you about, because what you
suggest breaks the unit test code...
Cheers,
Matthew
On Wed, 2008-03-19 at 23:32 +0200, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> I'm starting a new thread, because the original one got hijacked by the
> doctest/unittest flam
