Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-14 Thread Paul Winkler
On Sun, Nov 13, 2005 at 02:55:22PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
 Of course the release manager should have the last say and as the
 release manager it's totally valid for Andreas to delete the branch.
 Apologies for taking initiative.  I was really just trying to unstick
 Paul and get things rolling again.

Thanks Chris, I didn't mean for you to get you in hot water.

And thanks Jim for directly answering my question,
which is really all I needed :)

-- 

Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton

Paul Winkler wrote:

On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:08AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:


This is a reminder that there will be a feature freeze for the December
Zope releases on November 1.  



OK.  I thought there was going to be a 2.9 branch by now,
but I don't see one.  Is the trunk totally frozen now or what?


Yes, no new features.


Is it too late to land my long-forgotten configure changes
as discussed at
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/2004-July/151839.html ?


Yes

The sooner we're ready for the first beta, the sooner we can
make the beta and the branch.  We need more volunteers to help
with fixing bugs.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton

Chris McDonough wrote:

I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually
supposed to make the branch.  I have just gone ahead and made it.

But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features.


I wish you hadn't done that.  We shouldn't be making the branch until we get to 
beta.
We can't get to beta until a lot more bugs are fixed.  Everyone likes to
work on new features, but we need to get bug fixed to actually make releases.
I'm worried that we aren't going to make the time-based release schedule.
The only leverage I can see is feature freezes.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Stephan Richter
On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:48, Jim Fulton wrote:
 Chris McDonough wrote:
  I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually
  supposed to make the branch.  I have just gone ahead and made it.
 
  But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features.

 I wish you hadn't done that.  We shouldn't be making the branch until we
 get to beta. We can't get to beta until a lot more bugs are fixed.
  Everyone likes to work on new features, but we need to get bug fixed to
 actually make releases. I'm worried that we aren't going to make the
 time-based release schedule. The only leverage I can see is feature
 freezes.

Jim, I am really glad you wrote this comment. I was going to write a similar 
E-mail, but thought it would be out of line for me, since I am not involved 
in the Zope 2 development. 

If someone would have done that with Zope 3, I would have been pretty annoyed. 
Thus for Zope 3, if someone creates a release branch without discussing it 
with me first, then that person automatically becomes the release manager for 
that release.

Regards,
Stephan
-- 
Stephan Richter
CBU Physics  Chemistry (B.S.) / Tufts Physics (Ph.D. student)
Web2k - Web Software Design, Development and Training
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists -
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton

Stephan Richter wrote:

On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:48, Jim Fulton wrote:


Chris McDonough wrote:


I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually
supposed to make the branch.  I have just gone ahead and made it.

But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features.


I wish you hadn't done that.  We shouldn't be making the branch until we
get to beta. We can't get to beta until a lot more bugs are fixed.
Everyone likes to work on new features, but we need to get bug fixed to
actually make releases. I'm worried that we aren't going to make the
time-based release schedule. The only leverage I can see is feature
freezes.



Jim, I am really glad you wrote this comment. I was going to write a similar 
E-mail, but thought it would be out of line for me, since I am not involved 
in the Zope 2 development. 

If someone would have done that with Zope 3, I would have been pretty annoyed. 
Thus for Zope 3, if someone creates a release branch without discussing it 
with me first, then that person automatically becomes the release manager for 
that release.


Yup.

BTW, I'm sure Chris meant well.

Chris,

I appreciate that you were trying to help.
I still wish you hadn't made the branch. :)

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Andreas Jung



--On 13. November 2005 11:26:44 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


Chris,

I appreciate that you were trying to help.
I still wish you hadn't made the branch. :)




svn delete should solve that problem :-)

-aj


pgpwMOGS2dLXV.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 11:26 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
 Stephan Richter wrote:
  On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:48, Jim Fulton wrote:
  
 Chris McDonough wrote:
 
 I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually
 supposed to make the branch.  I have just gone ahead and made it.
 
 But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features.
 
 I wish you hadn't done that.  We shouldn't be making the branch until we
 get to beta. We can't get to beta until a lot more bugs are fixed.
  Everyone likes to work on new features, but we need to get bug fixed to
 actually make releases. I'm worried that we aren't going to make the
 time-based release schedule. The only leverage I can see is feature
 freezes.
  
  
  Jim, I am really glad you wrote this comment. I was going to write a 
  similar 
  E-mail, but thought it would be out of line for me, since I am not involved 
  in the Zope 2 development. 
  
  If someone would have done that with Zope 3, I would have been pretty 
  annoyed. 
  Thus for Zope 3, if someone creates a release branch without discussing it 
  with me first, then that person automatically becomes the release manager 
  for 
  that release.
 
 Yup.
 
 BTW, I'm sure Chris meant well.
 
 Chris,
 
 I appreciate that you were trying to help.
 I still wish you hadn't made the branch. :)

Yes, I predicted I'd be punished. ;-)  I don't understand why you would
want to wait to make a release branch until a beta.  What is the
rationale?

- C


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 17:32 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
 
 --On 13. November 2005 11:26:44 -0500 Jim Fulton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Chris,
 
  I appreciate that you were trying to help.
  I still wish you hadn't made the branch. :)
 
 
 
 svn delete should solve that problem :-)

Of course the release manager should have the last say and as the
release manager it's totally valid for Andreas to delete the branch.
Apologies for taking initiative.  I was really just trying to unstick
Paul and get things rolling again.

But I'd like to understand the rationale for not branching at the time
if the feature freeze (Nov 1).  Is it just to avoid the work of merging
changes from the branch back the HEAD during the period between the
freeze and the beta?  Doesn't svn make this pretty easy?  And what is
the maximum amount of time between freeze and beta that we'd consider
reasonable?

Also, it sounds as if there's an argument being made that *everyone*
should pitch in to get 2.9 beta out the door *instead* of committing
Zope 2 feature work and the delayed branching is the manifestation of
legislation that aims to make this happen.  I'm not sure it's healthy
to legislate this.  There are people who have no burning desire to see a
2.9 go out the door within the next few weeks, but OTOH they are very
willing to commit some valuable feature work right now for an eventual
2.10 release and due to the freeze, they haven't done so (and may never
do so if not now, given the volunteer-ness of their efforts).  How can
we accomodate those people in the future?  IMO, we should try not to
discourage contribution and so we should branch regardless of the state
of the trunk within, say, two weeks of freeze.  Does that sound
reasonable for future releases?

- C


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Andreas Jung



--On 13. November 2005 14:55:22 -0500 Chris McDonough [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:





But I'd like to understand the rationale for not branching at the time
if the feature freeze (Nov 1).  Is it just to avoid the work of merging
changes from the branch back the HEAD during the period between the
freeze and the beta?  Doesn't svn make this pretty easy?  And what is
the maximum amount of time between freeze and beta that we'd consider
reasonable?


I think all people involved in 2.9 should get their contributions right on 
the trunk. Then we can branch. Fixing stuff on multiple branches is a pain.
You could create a temporary branch for your stuff and merge it back into 
the HEAD when the 2.9 branch. I think Jim came up with idea to develop new 
features on a branch. Branches aka new features should be merged into the 
HEAD if they are considered to be stable. The reason for this approach but 
be to have the HEAD in a reasonable stable state and to be able to cut a 
release branch at any time.


Andreas

pgpRF1znVUWZF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 21:07 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
  Branches aka new features should be merged into the 
 HEAD if they are considered to be stable. The reason for this approach but 
 be to have the HEAD in a reasonable stable state and to be able to cut a 
 release branch at any time.

Yup.  That's exactly what appears to not be happening at the moment, so
I'm confused.  The critical issues that are listed in the collector are
bugs and not problems created by feature creep.  Do those sorts of
issues prevent a branch from being made?  Or are there other issues that
aren't in the collector that are preventing a branch from being made?

- C


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 12:38 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
 On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 11:26 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
  Stephan Richter wrote:
   On Sunday 13 November 2005 10:48, Jim Fulton wrote:
   
  Chris McDonough wrote:
  
  I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually
  supposed to make the branch.  I have just gone ahead and made it.
  
  But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features.
  
  I wish you hadn't done that.  We shouldn't be making the branch until we
  get to beta. We can't get to beta until a lot more bugs are fixed.
   Everyone likes to work on new features, but we need to get bug fixed to
  actually make releases. I'm worried that we aren't going to make the
  time-based release schedule. The only leverage I can see is feature
  freezes.
   
   
   Jim, I am really glad you wrote this comment. I was going to write a 
   similar 
   E-mail, but thought it would be out of line for me, since I am not 
   involved 
   in the Zope 2 development. 
   
   If someone would have done that with Zope 3, I would have been pretty 
   annoyed. 
   Thus for Zope 3, if someone creates a release branch without discussing 
   it 
   with me first, then that person automatically becomes the release manager 
   for 
   that release.
  
  Yup.
  
  BTW, I'm sure Chris meant well.
  
  Chris,
  
  I appreciate that you were trying to help.
  I still wish you hadn't made the branch. :)
 
 Yes, I predicted I'd be punished. ;-)  I don't understand why you would
 want to wait to make a release branch until a beta.  What is the
 rationale?

Reread my posts.

Jim


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 15:20 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
 On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 21:07 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:
   Branches aka new features should be merged into the 
  HEAD if they are considered to be stable. The reason for this approach but 
  be to have the HEAD in a reasonable stable state and to be able to cut a 
  release branch at any time.
 
 Yup.  That's exactly what appears to not be happening at the moment, so
 I'm confused.  The critical issues that are listed in the collector are
 bugs and not problems created by feature creep.  Do those sorts of
 issues prevent a branch from being made?  Or are there other issues that
 aren't in the collector that are preventing a branch from being made?

I don't know if those bugs should prevent a beta or not.  But there
needs to be some criteria other than feature completeness.  Is Zope 2
really in good shape? Or do people just not care?

Jim

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Jim Fulton
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 14:55 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
 On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 17:32 +0100, Andreas Jung wrote:

...

 Also, it sounds as if there's an argument being made that *everyone*
 should pitch in to get 2.9 beta out the door *instead* of committing
 Zope 2 feature work and the delayed branching is the manifestation of
 legislation that aims to make this happen. 

Yup. You figured it out.

 I'm not sure it's healthy
 to legislate this. 

I'm not sure either, but we have to try something.

  There are people who have no burning desire to see a
 2.9 go out the door within the next few weeks, but OTOH they are very
 willing to commit some valuable feature work right now for an eventual
 2.10 release and due to the freeze, they haven't done so (and may never
 do so if not now, given the volunteer-ness of their efforts). 


OK, then there will be less for the people who are willing to fix bugs
to work on later.

  How can
 we accomodate those people in the future? 

They can always work on a development branch.


  IMO, we should try not to
 discourage contribution and so we should branch regardless of the state
 of the trunk within, say, two weeks of freeze.  Does that sound
 reasonable for future releases?

Not to me.

Jim

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 16:42 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
 I don't know if those bugs should prevent a beta or not.  But there
 needs to be some criteria other than feature completeness.

To create the branch or a beta release?  I realize there's a desire to
tie these acts together but still don't fully understand the rationale
for that after rereading your posts as you suggested.  I don't want to
belabor the point, though, so just call pope at any time and I'll
stop, at least for today. ;-)

   Is Zope 2
 really in good shape? Or do people just not care?

Maybe both? ;-)  I'm currently investigating #1685, so that should be
resolved one way or another today.  There is one other public bug that
doesn't appear to be a showstopper.  There are some private bugs too
that I haven't looked at.  I just noticed Phil's post on the zope3 list
where he enumerates what needs to be done for Five/zpkg.  None of that
is in the collector.  There is a Wiki at
http://www.zope.org/Wikis/DevSite/Projects/Zope2.9/FrontPage .  It
doesn't have much info in it.  I've made it accessible via
http://www.zope.org/DevHome/Projects/ now so maybe those who have things
to finish up can enumerate what needs to be done there before a beta can
be released.

- C


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-13 Thread Chris McDonough
On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 17:07 -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
 On Sun, 2005-11-13 at 16:42 -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
  I don't know if those bugs should prevent a beta or not.  But there
  needs to be some criteria other than feature completeness.
 
 To create the branch or a beta release?  I realize there's a desire to
 tie these acts together but still don't fully understand the rationale
 for that after rereading your posts as you suggested.  I don't want to
 belabor the point, though, so just call pope at any time and I'll
 stop, at least for today. ;-)

Ignore this.  You called pope in another message.

- C


___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-12 Thread Paul Winkler
On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:08AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
 This is a reminder that there will be a feature freeze for the December
 Zope releases on November 1.  

OK.  I thought there was going to be a 2.9 branch by now,
but I don't see one.  Is the trunk totally frozen now or what?

Is it too late to land my long-forgotten configure changes
as discussed at
http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/2004-July/151839.html ?

This would allow multiple preferred versions of Python
when a bugfix release of python comes out - so we don't do
something silly like advise people to downgrade from a perfectly
good 2.4.x  to 2.4.(x-1).

I negligently never merged my branch, forgot about it, and only 
remembered it when Florent nudged us to clean up old branches. I 
have a local zope 2 trunk sandbox with my changes hand-merged into
configure, but my branch is so ancient that I think I should delete it
and start over.

-- 

Paul Winkler
http://www.slinkp.com
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-12 Thread Chris McDonough
I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually
supposed to make the branch.  I have just gone ahead and made it.

But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features.


- C

On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 14:56 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
 On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:08AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:
  This is a reminder that there will be a feature freeze for the December
  Zope releases on November 1.  
 
 OK.  I thought there was going to be a 2.9 branch by now,
 but I don't see one.  Is the trunk totally frozen now or what?
 
 Is it too late to land my long-forgotten configure changes
 as discussed at
 http://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope/2004-July/151839.html ?
 
 This would allow multiple preferred versions of Python
 when a bugfix release of python comes out - so we don't do
 something silly like advise people to downgrade from a perfectly
 good 2.4.x  to 2.4.(x-1).
 
 I negligently never merged my branch, forgot about it, and only 
 remembered it when Florent nudged us to clean up old branches. I 
 have a local zope 2 trunk sandbox with my changes hand-merged into
 configure, but my branch is so ancient that I think I should delete it
 and start over.
 

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-12 Thread Chris McDonough
Yep, it's a free-for-all again. ;-)  Although probably it's better to
create a branch and get some consensus before merging it as opposed to
landing stuff directly on the trunk.

On Sat, 2005-11-12 at 22:14 -0500, Paul Winkler wrote:
 On Sat, Nov 12, 2005 at 09:59:45PM -0500, Chris McDonough wrote:
  I suspect there's just some miscommunication about who is actually
  supposed to make the branch.  I have just gone ahead and made it.
  
  But yes, now that there is one, the 2.9 branch is frozen for features.
 
 Which means I can now land stuff on the trunk again?
 
 :-)
 
 -PW
  

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


Re: [Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-11-12 Thread Andreas Jung



--On 12. November 2005 14:56:45 -0500 Paul Winkler [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:



On Tue, Oct 18, 2005 at 07:21:08AM -0400, Jim Fulton wrote:

This is a reminder that there will be a feature freeze for the December
Zope releases on November 1.


OK.  I thought there was going to be a 2.9 branch by now,
but I don't see one.  Is the trunk totally frozen now or what?



The reason why there is no 2.9 branch available is just because Jim, 
Stephan and I agreed to create branches at the time of the 2.9 and 3.2 b1 
releases. However there is/was some more work to do so the branch did not 
exist yet.


Andreas



pgpRR9emcbcPm.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce
 http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )


[Zope-dev] Reminder: feature freeze November 1.

2005-10-18 Thread Jim Fulton


This is a reminder that there will be a feature freeze for the December
Zope releases on November 1.  No new features for the November releases should
be added after October 31.  The Zope trunks should be stable and ready for a 
beta
release on November 1.

We are committed to time-based releases. This means we need to be very
disciplined about deadlines.  If a cool new feature isn't quite
ready before November 1, then it could be be included in the June
release, for which the feature freeze will be May 1.

Jim

--
Jim Fulton   mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]   Python Powered!
CTO  (540) 361-1714http://www.python.org
Zope Corporation http://www.zope.com   http://www.zope.org

___
Zope-Dev maillist  -  Zope-Dev@zope.org
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev
**  No cross posts or HTML encoding!  **
(Related lists - 
http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce

http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )