Stephan Richter wrote:
Yes, that is true for packages in zope.
So, if I understand you correctly, I can use all packages, except those
in zope.app, on their own, without having to rely on anything else, right?
However, zope.app was designed as the
application server and has thus many
On Thursday 03 February 2005 03:23, Chris Withers wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
Yes, that is true for packages in zope.
So, if I understand you correctly, I can use all packages, except those
in zope.app, on their own, without having to rely on anything else, right?
However, zope.app was
Chris Withers wrote:
Stephan Richter wrote:
Yes, that is true for packages in zope.
So, if I understand you correctly, I can use all packages, except those
in zope.app, on their own, without having to rely on anything else, right?
No, but we try to restrict dependencies as much as possible.
The
Sidnei da Silva wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:53:01AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
snip
| I haven't decided
| which parts of Zope 3 should be included in Zope 2.8 and would like to
| get input. If you have suggestions on what to include or exclude,
| please respond here or on the z3-file list,
Jim Fulton wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
+1 on all of those from me. However, I will be satisfied with anything
that gets released as 2.8 sometime this year ;-)
Absolutely. The top priority, IMO, is getting 2.8 out as soon as
we can.
Excuse me, but it seems bizarre to me that *if* the top priority
Martijn Faassen wrote:
That's only to make things more easily deployable. Right now the hard
part is however detaching Zope 3 stuff from its dependencies
Really? That's extremely disappointing :-(
The most important aim of Zope 3 from my POV was to be able to use as
little or as much of it as
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 05:28, Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
That's only to make things more easily deployable. Right now the hard
part is however detaching Zope 3 stuff from its dependencies
Really? That's extremely disappointing :-(
The most important aim of Zope 3
Stephan Richter wrote:
On Wednesday 02 February 2005 05:28, Chris Withers wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
That's only to make things more easily deployable. Right now the hard
part is however detaching Zope 3 stuff from its dependencies
Really? That's extremely disappointing :-(
The most important
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
Paul Winkler wrote:
+1 on all of those from me. However, I will be satisfied with anything
that gets released as 2.8 sometime this year ;-)
Absolutely. The top priority, IMO, is getting 2.8 out as soon as
we can.
Excuse me, but it seems bizarre to me
Martijn Faassen wrote:
...
Five has dependencies on zope.app, so to make Five use Zope 2.8 packages
would require quite a bit of Zope 3 to be pulled in, or an awful lot of
work to prevent it from being pulled in.
I think Zope 3 is at a point where, if there are volunteers, it would be
worthwhile
Jim Fulton wrote:
Martijn Faassen wrote:
...
Five has dependencies on zope.app, so to make Five use Zope 2.8
packages would require quite a bit of Zope 3 to be pulled in, or an
awful lot of work to prevent it from being pulled in.
I think Zope 3 is at a point where, if there are volunteers, it
Jim Fulton wrote:
please respond here or on the z3-file list,
Which list is this?
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Zope Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org
Chris Withers wrote:
Jim Fulton wrote:
please respond here or on the z3-file list,
Which list is this?
z3-five, of course. :)
http://codespeak.net/mailman/listinfo/z3-five
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python Powered!
CTO (540) 361-1714
I've just checked in a change on the Zope 2 trunk for Zope 2.8
that renames the Zope package to Zope2. Importing the Zope
module is now deprecated, but will be supported until Zope 2.11.
When using the Zope head or Zope 2.8, you should import Zope2
instead.
Originally, I had intended not to
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 10:53:01AM -0500, Jim Fulton wrote:
snip
| I haven't decided
| which parts of Zope 3 should be included in Zope 2.8 and would like to
| get input. If you have suggestions on what to include or exclude,
| please respond here or on the z3-file list, where I am also posting
|
I agree with Sidnei.
Note that diskussions about the Zope2 + Zope3 pagetemplate issue arrived
in the conclusion that, the faster we can get Zope3 pagetemplates back
ported to Zope2, the happier we will be. ;) I have no idea if that is a
big task or not.
On Mon, 31 Jan 2005 19:25:15 +0100, Lennart Regebro [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that diskussions about the Zope2 + Zope3 pagetemplate issue arrived
in the conclusion that, the faster we can get Zope3 pagetemplates back
ported to Zope2, the happier we will be. ;) I have no idea if that is a
... Zope3 packages useful in Zope 2 ...
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2005-1-31 14:03 -0200:
...
Whatever we have in Five right now seems like a good subset. I haven't
felt need for much more than that anyways. We have:
- Adapters
- Views
- Menus
- Some support for auto-generated forms
I would
Jim Fulton wrote:
I've just checked in a change on the Zope 2 trunk for Zope 2.8
that renames the Zope package to Zope2. Importing the Zope
module is now deprecated, but will be supported until Zope 2.11.
Actually, that's 2.10.
Jim
--
Jim Fulton mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Python
Fred Drake wrote:
My goal is that the various packages involved in page template in Zope
2 become facades over the Zope 3 implementation.
Same thing, IMO. ;-)
--
Lennart Regebro, Nuxeo http://www.nuxeo.com/
CPS Content Management http://www.cps-project.org/
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 07:58:38PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
... Zope3 packages useful in Zope 2 ...
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2005-1-31 14:03 -0200:
...
Whatever we have in Five right now seems like a good subset. I haven't
felt need for much more than that anyways. We have:
-
Paul Winkler wrote:
On Mon, Jan 31, 2005 at 07:58:38PM +0100, Dieter Maurer wrote:
... Zope3 packages useful in Zope 2 ...
Sidnei da Silva wrote at 2005-1-31 14:03 -0200:
...
Whatever we have in Five right now seems like a good subset. I haven't
felt need for much more than that anyways. We have:
22 matches
Mail list logo