On Apr 7, 2005, at 1:45, Florent Guillaume wrote:
After spending an hour helping someone debug a site that had an hidden
SiteRoot somewhere that prevented a virtual host monster from working,
it was suggested to me that if there's a virtual host monster, it
should take precedence (and
Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2005, 01:45 +0200 schrieb Florent Guillaume:
After spending an hour helping someone debug a site that had an hidden
SiteRoot somewhere that prevented a virtual host monster from working,
it was suggested to me that if there's a virtual host monster, it
should take
On Apr 7, 2005, at 9:08, Tino Wildenhain wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 07.04.2005, 01:45 +0200 schrieb Florent Guillaume:
After spending an hour helping someone debug a site that had an hidden
SiteRoot somewhere that prevented a virtual host monster from working,
it was suggested to me that if there's
After spending an hour helping someone debug a site that had an hidden
SiteRoot somewhere that prevented a virtual host monster from working,
it was suggested to me that if there's a virtual host monster, it
should take precedence (and deactivates) any further SiteRoot. I think
it's a good
