Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Jens Vagelpohl
On Apr 26, 2005, at 2:22, Florent Guillaume wrote: Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Technical details of permanent failure: PERM_FAILURE: SMTP Error (state 9): 553 5.3.0 Spam blocked see: http://spamcop.net/bl.shtml?64.233.184.203 Yeah this goes to show that you have to be extremely careful in

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Christian Theune
Great. And the current situation doesn't even catch too much spam. We're relying on some central spam filtering infrastructure here. Looks like I got to tune it again... Am Montag, den 25.04.2005, 17:46 -0400 schrieb Tim Peters: You should really be using SpamBayes 0.9 wink. -- gocept gmbh

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Christian Theune
Howdy, Am Montag, den 25.04.2005, 16:37 -0400 schrieb Tim Peters: AFAIK, nobody looks at WinBuilders between releases. It's traditionally been the job of whoever builds the Windows installer to sort out whatever troubles WinBuilders has gotten into since the last release. Certainly most

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Tim Peters
... [Tim Peters] What exactly do you do to run tests? This is exactly what I do: svn up python setup.py build_ext -i python test.py -vv --all [Christian Theune] I go to the build directory of the WinBuilders and run bin/test.py 1. Is there a reason to _expect_ that to work? The

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Christian Theune
Howdy, Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2005, 11:38 -0400 schrieb Tim Peters: [Christian Theune] I go to the build directory of the WinBuilders and run bin/test.py 1. Is there a reason to _expect_ that to work? The WinBuilders README.txt doesn't claim that it should. Would sure be nice if

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Christian Theune
Sticking to this thread ... Now the unit tests look like this: == ERROR: testCorrectFactories (zope.app.publisher.browser.tests.test_directoryreso urce.Test) --

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Tim Peters
Sticking to this thread ... Now the unit tests look like this: The Zope trunk test_http_factory and test_webdav_source_factory tests have been failing on Windows this way since last October (even when running tests from a checkout tree). See: http://www.zope.org/Collectors/Zope/1728

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim] 2. Which Python do you use to run bin\test.py? I hope you're using bin\python.exe for that attempt anyway. [Christian] The one test.py refers to. (Yep, still tapping around blindly.) I'm not following. #! lines don't mean anything on Windows, and that's the only sense in which I

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, Am Dienstag, den 26.04.2005, 12:57 -0400 schrieb Tim Peters: [Tim] 2. Which Python do you use to run bin\test.py? I hope you're using bin\python.exe for that attempt anyway. [Christian] The one test.py refers to. (Yep, still tapping around blindly.) I'm not following. #!

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim] 2. Which Python do you use to run bin\test.py? I hope you're using bin\python.exe for that attempt anyway. [Christian] The one test.py refers to. (Yep, still tapping around blindly.) [Tim] I'm not following. #! lines don't mean anything on Windows, and [Christian] I think cygwin

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Tim Peters
[Tim] Someone with setup.py courage needs to step up to the plate then. The [...] possibly work either so long as setup.py neglects to install necessary files. [Christian] Yuppie did [Tim] That's not my understanding. My understanding (confirmed by eyeballing the checkins) is that Yuppie

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-26 Thread Andreas Jung
--On Dienstag, 26. April 2005 23:55 Uhr +0200 Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andreas: Can you please consider a beta2 instead of a rc as the next step? Thanks. You mean 2.8 b2? The next scheduled 2.8 release is b2 according to the posted release plan *wink*. -aj pgpbxpUn0lQjr.pgp

[Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-25 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, and again, I got to complain about building Zope on Windows. This time it's the 2.8 branch again with the 2.8b1 release. It looks like the WinBuilders aren't taken care for at all. The ZClass tests didn't got into the procedure of getting packaged so I had to copy those files manually for

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-25 Thread Tim Peters
[Christian Theune] and again, I got to complain about building Zope on Windows. This time it's the 2.8 branch again with the 2.8b1 release. It looks like the WinBuilders aren't taken care for at all. AFAIK, nobody looks at WinBuilders between releases. It's traditionally been the job of

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-25 Thread Tim Peters
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 16:37:01 -0400 From: Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reply-To: Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Christian Theune [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1 Cc: zope-dev@zope.org - Message truncated - You should really

Re: [Zope-dev] Windows Binaries for 2.8b1

2005-04-25 Thread Florent Guillaume
Tim Peters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: LOL -- the attempt to send my last msg to Christian from my gmail account got blocked: This is an automatically generated Delivery Status Notification Delivery to the following recipient failed permanently: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Technical details