On Fri, Aug 7, 2009 at 10:51 AM, Roger Ineichen<d...@projekt01.ch> wrote: ... > I think XML-RPC just belongs to an own package e.g. zope.xmlrpc. It doesn't > make sense to have XML-RPC in a package other then an own.
Agreed, although moving it out would introduce a backward incompatibility. Maybe there's a way to finesse this or maybe we just bump the major version # of zope.publisher. BTW, I don't think the approach we took (I helped :) for XMLRPC turned out well. Given ajax and json, I don't really care about xmlrpc any more, but if I did, I'd want to take a much lighter weight and more localized approach. > If we move the > XML-RPC part out of other packages, then we have the question should the > zope.xmlrpc package depend on IContainer? Probably not and the new > zope.xmlrpc > package should use your suggested conditional configuration. Yup > Such an own zope.xmlrpc package whould depend on the publisher as much as > the XML-RPC implementation does. This allows to use a custom XML-RPC > implementation based on something else then the publisher concept. > (custom xmlrpc package) > > Does this make sense? Yes, except that I don't really care about xmlrpc and If I did, I'd take a different approach. Jim -- Jim Fulton _______________________________________________ Zope-Dev maillist - Zope-Dev@zope.org http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-dev ** No cross posts or HTML encoding! ** (Related lists - http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope-announce http://mail.zope.org/mailman/listinfo/zope )