Martin Aspeli wrote:
If we do that, I'd also suggest we use the 'buildout.dumppickedversions'
extension. This prints the picked versions with some explanation about
what required them, either to a file or to the console. This is a useful
sanity check: if you see a package in there that
Chris Withers wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
If we do that, I'd also suggest we use the 'buildout.dumppickedversions'
extension. This prints the picked versions with some explanation about
what required them, either to a file or to the console. This is a useful
sanity check: if you see a
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com
wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that we should remove this
Jim Fulton wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 8:50 PM, Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com
wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com
wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that we should remove this from ztk.cfg, as if we
publish this for reuse we don't
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
If we do that, I'd also suggest we use the 'buildout.dumppickedversions'
extension.
Does that make sense? After all, if we say allow-picked-version is
false, there never will *be* any picked
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen
faas...@startifact.com wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that we should remove this from ztk.cfg, as if we
publish
Hanno Schlichting wrote:
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 2:59 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com
wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
If we do that, I'd also suggest we use the 'buildout.dumppickedversions'
extension.
Does that make sense? After all, if we say allow-picked-version is
false, there
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Right, sorry, I must've been tired when I read this. In my mind, I read
it as disallow-picked-versions = false. :)
No, I'm not crazy after all. The thread is about *removing*
allow-picked-versions=false i.e. allowing versions to be picked. I
don't not hate those double
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Martin Aspeli wrote:
Right, sorry, I must've been tired when I read this. In my mind, I read
it as disallow-picked-versions = false. :)
No, I'm not crazy after all. The thread is about *removing*
allow-picked-versions=false i.e. allowing versions to be picked. I
Hi there,
To quote Thomas Lotze in another discussion:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
which makes buildout complain if it ends up using a package whose
version it had to pick from the index, so you're required to specify a
version for every package used by
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 10:29 PM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote:
[ztk.cfg] contains a line
allow-picked-versions = false
I agree with Thomas that we should remove this from ztk.cfg, as if we
publish this for reuse we don't want to impose this policy on everybody
who builds
12 matches
Mail list logo
