On 18 June 2010 01:24, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, this issue is completely separate from the
two-phase-commit discussion that we had recently, since all the
connectors involved here are fully transactional.
As you can see here:
Hi Laurence
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:06, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 18 June 2010 01:24, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, this issue is completely separate from the
two-phase-commit discussion that we had recently, since all the
connectors
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 10:55, Hanno Schlichting ha...@hannosch.eu wrote:
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:32 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
In any case, does anyone oppose the existence of a .setSortKey() on
the TM class?
Your branch looks simple enough. Feel free to
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:29 PM, Leonardo Rochael Almeida
leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks. Can I commit it to Zope 2.12 as well? It is backward
compatible and helps us address a bug we see on production.
Go ahead. It really is trivial :)
Hanno
___
On 18 June 2010 14:32, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Laurence
On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 08:06, Laurence Rowe l...@lrowe.co.uk wrote:
On 18 June 2010 01:24, Leonardo Rochael Almeida leoroch...@gmail.com wrote:
By the way, this issue is completely separate from the
Hi,
In ERP5[1], which is CMF based, we have a number of strategies for
high performance and scalability. One of these is that we have
ZSQLCatalog extensively. The other is that we delay execution of
potentially expensive operations (like indexing) for background
execution. For the latter, we
