On 3 June 2010 05:34, Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Log message for revision 112947:
This extra has been gone for a month now.
How were we not seeing failing tests?
Changed:
U
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan-Jaap Driessen wrote:
The zope.browser trunk was, until recently (r112978), not part of the
buildbot at dev.thehealthagency.com.
The compattest of the zope toolkit will test the released version of
zope.browser [1]. The compattest does not
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tres Seaver wrote:
Log message for revision 112947:
This extra has been gone for a month now.
How were we not seeing failing tests?
Changed:
U zope.browser/trunk/buildout.cfg
-=-
Modified: zope.browser/trunk/buildout.cfg
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 12.12.2008, 05:06 +0100 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
...
Let's keep this pending and discuss at a later time again.
ok. please let me know when there's cleard space for features,
regards, robert
Regards
Roger Ineichen
___
On 2008-12-11 17:13:06 +0100, Roger Ineichen d...@projekt01.ch said:
Hi Martijn
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.browser?
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I saw that Roger Ineichen created and released a package called
zope.browser.
I assume that this package is intended to reduce
Hey,
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
[snip]
That's good. One thing which is not good is that you deprecated the use
of ITerms from zope.app.form. I'd just leave the reference/import there
like we did with ISite in zope.app.component.
Why is such a deprecation warning bad? Wouldn't this
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 02:24:09PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
[snip]
That's good. One thing which is not good is that you deprecated the use
of ITerms from zope.app.form. I'd just leave the reference/import there
like we did with ISite in
On 2008-12-12 14:24:09 +0100, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com said:
Hey,
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
[snip]
That's good. One thing which is not good is that you deprecated the use
of ITerms from zope.app.form. I'd just leave the reference/import there
like we did with ISite in
Hi,
Am Freitag, den 12.12.2008, 15:51 +0100 schrieb Christian Zagrodnick:
On 2008-12-12 14:24:09 +0100, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com said:
Hey,
Christian Zagrodnick wrote:
[snip]
That's good. One thing which is not good is that you deprecated the use
of ITerms from
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I saw that Roger Ineichen created and released a package called
zope.browser.
I assume that this package is intended to reduce dependencies, which is
a project I applaud. So far I don't see any effect of this - in fact
several packages now have an
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 03:20:25PM +0100, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I'm sure there's a bit of the plan I don't
understand yet - please enlighten me?
AFAIKR, it's a package that mostly contains interfaces for well accepted
browser design paradigms. That way different implementations can share
the
Hi Martijn
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.browser?
Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hi there,
I saw that Roger Ineichen created and released a package called
zope.browser.
I assume that this package is intended to reduce
dependencies, which
is a project I applaud. So far I don't
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 17:13 +0100 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
I just moved the zope.app.form.interfaces.ITerms interface
to this package. Which makes it possible to implement ISource
and their widgets in z3c.form wihtout to depend on zope.app.browser.
(zagy branch in z3c.form)
Hi there,
Robert Niederreiter wrote:
[snip]
We have written browser helper tools in a package named
cornerstone.browser. especially IRequestMixin here
http://dev.plone.org/collective/browser/cornerstone.browser/trunk/cornerstone/browser/interfaces.py
might be a candidate for this or such
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 18:18 +0100 schrieb Martijn Faassen:
Hi there,
Robert Niederreiter wrote:
[snip]
We have written browser helper tools in a package named
cornerstone.browser. especially IRequestMixin here
On Thursday 11 December 2008, Martijn Faassen wrote:
I think we should be careful not to introduce more functionality into
zope.browser right now that isn't moved from some other zope.* package.
The goal after all, as I understand it, is to reduce installation
dependencies.
+1
Regards,
Hi Martijn
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.browser?
[...]
I think we should be careful not to introduce more
functionality into zope.browser right now that isn't moved
from some other zope.* package.
The goal after all, as I understand it, is to reduce
installation dependencies.
Yes
Hi Robert
Betreff: Re: [Zope-dev] zope.browser?
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 11.12.2008, 17:13 +0100 schrieb Roger Ineichen:
I just moved the zope.app.form.interfaces.ITerms interface to this
package. Which makes it possible to implement ISource and their
widgets in z3c.form wihtout
18 matches
Mail list logo
