[Zope-dev] Zope Tests: 6 OK

2009-12-04 Thread Zope Tests Summarizer
Summary of messages to the zope-tests list. Period Thu Dec 3 12:00:00 2009 UTC to Fri Dec 4 12:00:00 2009 UTC. There were 6 messages: 6 from Zope Tests. Tests passed OK --- Subject: OK : Zope-2.10 Python-2.4.6 : Linux From: Zope Tests Date: Thu Dec 3 20:38:38 EST 2009 URL:

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-04 Thread Martijn Faassen
Thomas Lotze wrote: [snip] How are we going to organise the work? Do you intend to sketch out a plan for action? Should everyone create their own branches and experiment for a while first? I think you're the main volunteer we have to work on this, so I suggest you try your stuff on a branch.

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-04 Thread Martijn Faassen
Godefroid Chapelle wrote: [snip] I tried to follow this discussion closely: however, I cannot say that I understand if doing multi-adaptation with IFoo(bar, baz, boo) has been rejected or postponed. Multi adaptation with IFoo(foo, bar) is off the agenda. Whether that means a permanent

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-04 Thread Martijn Faassen
Martin Aspeli wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: Hi there, I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision. I'm a little worried that neither Stephan Richter, nor Jim Fulton have had much weight in on this. They seem like important stakeholders. :) Stephan has chipped in on this

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-04 Thread Martijn Faassen
Thomas Lotze wrote: [snip] I'd be happy to lead this effort, if you like to put it like that. I wouldn't want to take it out of Martijn's hands, though, unless he's happy with it as well, given that he's the one who started the discussion. By all means take the lead on the implementation. :)

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-04 Thread Martijn Faassen
Brian Sutherland wrote: On Thu, Dec 03, 2009 at 03:11:07PM -0700, Shane Hathaway wrote: Godefroid Chapelle wrote: I tried to follow this discussion closely: however, I cannot say that I understand if doing multi-adaptation with IFoo(bar, baz, boo) has been rejected or postponed. AFAICT,

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-04 Thread Christian Theune
Hi, On 12/03/2009 06:41 PM, Martijn Faassen wrote: Hi there, I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision. Hopefully everybody is at least reasonably happy with this: An adapt() method will be added to Interface. It takes the objects to adapt as *args, and optional but explicit

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-04 Thread Thomas Lotze
Gary Poster wrote: I would think we would want to follow the pattern of the adapter_hooks in zope.interface.interface, including the C optimizations. Speaking of adapter hooks: If I'm not completely mistaken, adapter hooks know about exactly one object to be adapted. To follow the pattern of

Re: [Zope-dev] the ZCA API decision

2009-12-04 Thread Jim Fulton
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:27 AM, Martijn Faassen faas...@startifact.com wrote: Martin Aspeli wrote: Martijn Faassen wrote: Hi there, I think we've had enough discussion to make a decision. I'm a little worried that neither Stephan Richter, nor Jim Fulton have had much weight in on this.